It looks like he has gone with the new 3 5 2 to shoehorn Tunzabe and Ings.I think this is a mistake.
Quote from: ChicagoLion on October 13, 2021, 11:05:38 AMIt looks like he has gone with the new 3 5 2 to shoehorn Tunzabe and Ings.I think this is a mistake.That's the spirit!
Quote from: ChicagoLion on October 13, 2021, 11:05:38 AMIt looks like he has gone with the new 3 5 2 to shoehorn Tunzabe and Ings.I think this is a mistake.Agreed on Ings but it's a temporary fudge I reckon. He has spent a lot of money on Buendia, Bailey and Traore too, none of them fit in that system.
Quote from: brontebilly on October 16, 2021, 12:06:09 AMQuote from: ChicagoLion on October 13, 2021, 11:05:38 AMIt looks like he has gone with the new 3 5 2 to shoehorn Tunzabe and Ings.I think this is a mistake.Agreed on Ings but it's a temporary fudge I reckon. He has spent a lot of money on Buendia, Bailey and Traore too, none of them fit in that system.Disagree mate, as I feel all three could play a couple of positions in that formation. They could play as an advanced midfielder with two defensive midfielders behind them or could play in a free role in the two up top with either Ings or Watkins. Would especially like to see Bailey in that kind of role.As for CL's point, not so sure about Tuanzebe, but definitely think part of the reason to moving to 3-5-2 was to have Watkins and Ings playing centrally without losing the three in midfield.