How have we fucked it all up? It's not always as good as we'd like but not one poster on here would have turned down being in a cup final and outside the bottom 3 on the 1st Feb if offered it before the season started.
Yes but it doesn’t end now. If we put in more performances like today then it won’t be ok when all is said and done. Losing twice to Bournemouth is really poor whichever way you look at it.
I would swap that all day long for mid table Premiership security.
Quote from: Demitri_C on February 01, 2020, 06:58:42 PMQuote from: walsall villain on February 01, 2020, 06:03:11 PMI think he’s doing ok too. Play off winners always struggle so this was sort of what I expected. Play off winners dont spend 150m and be consistently shit most of the season. They can at least do a bit better on the road.They do spend £150m if they need to bring in 16 players. As for play-off winners not being consistently shit most of their first season up, the facts would suggest differently:2013-4 - QPR promoted through playoffs, finished 20th - relegated2014-5 - Norwich promoted through playoffs, finished 19th - relegated2015-6 - Hull promoted through playoffs, finished 18th - relegated2016-7 - Huddersfield promoted through playoffs, finished 16th & 4 points from relegation zone2017-8 - Fulham promoted through playoffs, finished 19th - relegated2018-9 - Us promoted through playoffs, currently 17th & 1 point from relegation zoneIf you look at it as we were the lowest team at the start of the season - the statistically worst team to come up from the Championship, the goal is to move up from that to at minimum 17th. We are in the battle for that. Not saying that we've been great, or mistakes haven't been made or even that if we want to push on to midtable and then top 6 Smith is the man, but at the moment we are doing exactly what history suggests a team in our position is likely to do, in fact slightly better.
Quote from: walsall villain on February 01, 2020, 06:03:11 PMI think he’s doing ok too. Play off winners always struggle so this was sort of what I expected. Play off winners dont spend 150m and be consistently shit most of the season. They can at least do a bit better on the road.
I think he’s doing ok too. Play off winners always struggle so this was sort of what I expected.
Quote from: SheffieldVillain on February 01, 2020, 07:10:43 PMQuote from: Demitri_C on February 01, 2020, 06:58:42 PMQuote from: walsall villain on February 01, 2020, 06:03:11 PMI think he’s doing ok too. Play off winners always struggle so this was sort of what I expected. Play off winners dont spend 150m and be consistently shit most of the season. They can at least do a bit better on the road.They do spend £150m if they need to bring in 16 players. As for play-off winners not being consistently shit most of their first season up, the facts would suggest differently:2013-4 - QPR promoted through playoffs, finished 20th - relegated2014-5 - Norwich promoted through playoffs, finished 19th - relegated2015-6 - Hull promoted through playoffs, finished 18th - relegated2016-7 - Huddersfield promoted through playoffs, finished 16th & 4 points from relegation zone2017-8 - Fulham promoted through playoffs, finished 19th - relegated2018-9 - Us promoted through playoffs, currently 17th & 1 point from relegation zoneIf you look at it as we were the lowest team at the start of the season - the statistically worst team to come up from the Championship, the goal is to move up from that to at minimum 17th. We are in the battle for that. Not saying that we've been great, or mistakes haven't been made or even that if we want to push on to midtable and then top 6 Smith is the man, but at the moment we are doing exactly what history suggests a team in our position is likely to do, in fact slightly better.I think after a disappointing day like today your post puts things into a reasonable perspective and makes perfect sense. Let's not forget as League Cup and promotion winners under Ron Saunders we finished 16th in our first season after promotion in 1976 and in our first season back in the top flight under SGT in 1989 we finished 17th out of twenty, one point ahead of the relegation places.
The £150m is a red herring.We had to spend that money, we were starting from a position of barely having enough players to form a team, let alone a squad. We HAD to spend money to get the numbers up.If anything, we didn't spend enough, we got the numbers up but I don't think we got the quality up enough.
Is it just me or are players these days much more prone to massive form swings? Fancying it or not fancying it on the day seems to be the new norm. Nakamba was unrecognizable as the player last Tuesday night.