Quote from: SoccerHQ on January 01, 2019, 09:18:13 PMNot finishing in the top 6 would be a failure.If people were asking this of SB when he first took over in 16/17 it certainly should be asked for now.yep I would agree, Bruce didn't exactly take over a smooth running engine of a side and I said he should make the play offs at least in his first seasonSmith had taken over a mish mash if a squad but I still feel he should be making the play offsthe reason being we arn't playing in some top quality league here, we are in the championshipQPR, Middlesbrough and fucking Birmingham City are above us the sides above and around us are no better than us, we might have a toothless midfield without Grealish but it's still better than most the general quality is poor, you don't have to be great to make it in the top 6, you just have to get yourselves organised have a go and play with confidence, and we have enough players who can do that even if most of them were bought by Bruce and will not make the grade long termso I agree with PWS im not giving him a bye for the rest of the season I want to see us play with that swagger again and get into those top 6 places
Not finishing in the top 6 would be a failure.If people were asking this of SB when he first took over in 16/17 it certainly should be asked for now.
Hull have somehow become the form team, W8 D3 L1, including 5 wins on the spin.
Quote from: Fred Crump on January 01, 2019, 09:27:47 PMGood grief. Give the bloke a break. He’s less than three months into the job , hasn’t yet had a transfer window, injuries to key players and we are still in with a good shout of the playoffs. How many of the critical posters above would feel happy being criticised in their jobs with similar constraints after that period of time , I wonder?Think people who are giving a 3 month appraisal are perfectly right and healthy to on performance so far .Injuries and unbalanced squad are taken into consideration by all , I believe , which comment here as we are all aware .However it feels like some have head in clouds and that posters who even ' dare' give a critical performance observation and question are just told" he hasn't been here long ""It's not his squad""We have injuries"I admire dean Smith as he doesn't use this as an excuse and I don't think ever would .That's a massive plus about this coach.He's working with what he's got and we are commenting on how he's working with what he's got.Straightforward really.
Good grief. Give the bloke a break. He’s less than three months into the job , hasn’t yet had a transfer window, injuries to key players and we are still in with a good shout of the playoffs. How many of the critical posters above would feel happy being criticised in their jobs with similar constraints after that period of time , I wonder?
Quote from: john e on January 01, 2019, 10:30:18 PMQuote from: SoccerHQ on January 01, 2019, 09:18:13 PMNot finishing in the top 6 would be a failure.If people were asking this of SB when he first took over in 16/17 it certainly should be asked for now.yep I would agree, Bruce didn't exactly take over a smooth running engine of a side and I said he should make the play offs at least in his first seasonSmith had taken over a mish mash if a squad but I still feel he should be making the play offsthe reason being we arn't playing in some top quality league here, we are in the championshipQPR, Middlesbrough and fucking Birmingham City are above us the sides above and around us are no better than us, we might have a toothless midfield without Grealish but it's still better than most the general quality is poor, you don't have to be great to make it in the top 6, you just have to get yourselves organised have a go and play with confidence, and we have enough players who can do that even if most of them were bought by Bruce and will not make the grade long termso I agree with PWS im not giving him a bye for the rest of the season I want to see us play with that swagger again and get into those top 6 places Bruce took on a squad of players that were either signed that summer from the top of championship and bottom of the prem or who had come down with us but, in many cases, weren't as bad as they'd looked the year before. Where we had real problems was our central midfield was pedestrian and we couldn't stop teams running through us. 2 years on Smith has taken on a team that, despite numerous signings, still has the same weakness through midfield but also has no cover for 3 of the 4 defensive positions, leaving us in a shocking state to deal with injuries. Both inherited a decent set of attacking players, Bruce struggled to get a tune from any of them in any consistent way, Smith is getting loads of goals but just can't get a functional defence in place.I have a lot more faith in Smith getting an improvement out of the defence (with a few signings) than I ever had with Bruce creating a consistent attacking platform for the forwards to build from. I've seen enough from us going forward to think we could break 100 goals in the league this year (about 2.5 a game for the rest of the season) so if we can get even a small improvement at the back we'll start to really frighten teams again, like we were a few weeks back.
Quote from: footyskillz on January 01, 2019, 09:37:44 PMQuote from: Fred Crump on January 01, 2019, 09:27:47 PMGood grief. Give the bloke a break. He’s less than three months into the job , hasn’t yet had a transfer window, injuries to key players and we are still in with a good shout of the playoffs. How many of the critical posters above would feel happy being criticised in their jobs with similar constraints after that period of time , I wonder?Think people who are giving a 3 month appraisal are perfectly right and healthy to on performance so far .Injuries and unbalanced squad are taken into consideration by all , I believe , which comment here as we are all aware .However it feels like some have head in clouds and that posters who even ' dare' give a critical performance observation and question are just told" he hasn't been here long ""It's not his squad""We have injuries"I admire dean Smith as he doesn't use this as an excuse and I don't think ever would .That's a massive plus about this coach.He's working with what he's got and we are commenting on how he's working with what he's got.Straightforward really.I think we should be really critical of Dean Smith for allowing Grealish, Axel and Taylor to get injured. In allowing this, the momentum, fluidity and confidence was stopped in its tracks because we hadn't got like for like players to bring in and, in some cases, players he should have brought in were injured or short of match fitness following injury.The squad is paper thin in players that can influence games in the right way and drastically short of pace in midfield and defence. To he'll with it, Smith is to blame for that too.Now, I need to trawl the web ....... architect, Rome....
Our squad in 16/17 was lopsided, not too far off what it is this season in fairness. We all thought at start of the season an attack of Ayew, Gestede, Jack, McCormack and Kodjia would rip through the division but it never happened and that was the strongest area of the squad by far.At the back Elphick massively struggled so we went with Baker-Chester which was o.k in fairness. Gollini also struggled a fair bit so similar to Nyland.Think the biggest difference was we still had a losing mentality running through the club at the time which resulted in our very slow start to that season.I never expected play offs that year anyway. Now it's different as we know what this level is about and of course spent loads since.