Good grief. Give the bloke a break. He’s less than three months into the job , hasn’t yet had a transfer window, injuries to key players and we are still in with a good shout of the playoffs. How many of the critical posters above would feel happy being criticised in their jobs with similar constraints after that period of time , I wonder?
Why are they heads in the clouds statements when all of it is absolutely factually correct?
Quote from: Toronto Villa on January 01, 2019, 09:39:00 PMWhy are they heads in the clouds statements when all of it is absolutely factually correct?That seemingly Dean smith is above critical analysis so that why as my own observation to some it feels he can't be questionned .Yet after 3 months plus recurring paterns and general debate for improvement some comment on what needs improving or how we are playing should be made without being told it's too soon or it's harsh when it's actually pretty accurate or fair assessment of situation
I’m really looking forward to games as I never did under Bruce for the following reasons: a) its entertaining b) we have an intelligent articulate manager who makes sensible decisions most of the time and c) he has changed the way we try to play , even if at times the team hasn’t been able to carry it out because of limitations caused by injury or lack of technical capability. We quite rightly moaned about the dreary , defensive, directionless, disjointed performances under Bruce and blamed him. It seems a bit odd to grumble about Dean Smith already when we are for the most part watching goals, attacking intent and effort from the same set of players - surely it must be him making the difference?
Quote from: Fred Crump on January 01, 2019, 09:51:07 PMI’m really looking forward to games as I never did under Bruce for the following reasons: a) its entertaining b) we have an intelligent articulate manager who makes sensible decisions most of the time and c) he has changed the way we try to play , even if at times the team hasn’t been able to carry it out because of limitations caused by injury or lack of technical capability. We quite rightly moaned about the dreary , defensive, directionless, disjointed performances under Bruce and blamed him. It seems a bit odd to grumble about Dean Smith already when we are for the most part watching goals, attacking intent and effort from the same set of players - surely it must be him making the difference? Can't argue with that, perhaps in a couple of years I might re-visit!
“Think people who are giving a 3 month appraisal are perfectly right and healthy to on performance so far” Of course , it’s a fans forum. It’s about opinions. But I don’t have to agree with yours and for what it’s worth, I don’t think I’ve got my head in the clouds Mr Footyskillz.
Or am I prone to swooning.
Bruce left us with a lopsided squad not fit for purpose - that being promotion. It’s still the same squad but depleted further by injuries to crucial players and loss of form of players playing out of position (Chester which was largely caused by Bruce’s negligence). Dean Smith needs time to sort out the clusterfuck at the back and on the training ground he now so clearly inherited.We’ll be a good shout for play offs but we’re never going to be in the running for the autos once Bruce had left us in a mess imo.
Not finishing in the top 6 would be a failure.If people were asking this of SB when he first took over in 16/17 it certainly should be asked for now.