The best performance in the 10 game run was McGinn away at Rotherham. The goal Grealish scored was sensational.Those 4 days in Yorkshire with the win at Wednesday and Rotherham...that's when you knew it was happening.
Quote from: Ads on October 03, 2020, 08:55:20 AMThe best performance in the 10 game run was McGinn away at Rotherham. The goal Grealish scored was sensational.Those 4 days in Yorkshire with the win at Wednesday and Rotherham...that's when you knew it was happening.Bristol city was also a good game and result.
Quote from: Ads on October 03, 2020, 08:55:20 AMThe best performance in the 10 game run was McGinn away at Rotherham. The goal Grealish scored was sensational.Those 4 days in Yorkshire with the win at Wednesday and Rotherham...that's when you knew it was happening. It was the Forest game away for me, exactly where we’d have dropped points under Bruce after the high of beating the rags on the Sunday before.
Quote from: themossman on October 03, 2020, 08:43:35 AMQuote from: OCD on October 03, 2020, 12:32:24 AMQuote from: dave.woodhall on October 02, 2020, 11:16:46 PMHe wasn't going to get us promoted until he did, but that was down to Grealish. He wasn't going to keep us up until he did, but that was down to lockdown. He couldn't attract big names until he did, but that was down to Terry. For someone who can't do anything he seems to have a lot happen regardless. It's like politics. You form an opinion and then confirmation bias has people looking for whatever can be interpreted as supporting evidence. Anything that doesn't support that view must be down to outside factors.Exactly this. There are pro and anti smith camps and in truth he’s given, and continues to give, evidence to both to support their cause. It’s true he got us promoted, which deserves much credit, also true that having the best player in the division back from injury and winning games on his own played a part. Impossible to separate these factors.It’s true he kept a poor squad up last year thanks to a great (overall) post lockdown run. It’s also true that he performed badly, overall, IMO, before lockdown, showing a lot of tactical naivety and intransigence, which put us in the position in the first place.I don’t think reeling out the the end results repeatedly makes the criticisms of how we got there any less valid. Or that criticising him means you don’t want him to succeed.Not disagreeing with your overall point. But Grealish didn’t win a single game on his own at any point. In the 10 game run to go up he was hugely influential, but wasn’t necessarily the best player in a fair number of those games, including the semi final away leg and final. SGM was just as influential in many of those games.
Quote from: OCD on October 03, 2020, 12:32:24 AMQuote from: dave.woodhall on October 02, 2020, 11:16:46 PMHe wasn't going to get us promoted until he did, but that was down to Grealish. He wasn't going to keep us up until he did, but that was down to lockdown. He couldn't attract big names until he did, but that was down to Terry. For someone who can't do anything he seems to have a lot happen regardless. It's like politics. You form an opinion and then confirmation bias has people looking for whatever can be interpreted as supporting evidence. Anything that doesn't support that view must be down to outside factors.Exactly this. There are pro and anti smith camps and in truth he’s given, and continues to give, evidence to both to support their cause. It’s true he got us promoted, which deserves much credit, also true that having the best player in the division back from injury and winning games on his own played a part. Impossible to separate these factors.It’s true he kept a poor squad up last year thanks to a great (overall) post lockdown run. It’s also true that he performed badly, overall, IMO, before lockdown, showing a lot of tactical naivety and intransigence, which put us in the position in the first place.I don’t think reeling out the the end results repeatedly makes the criticisms of how we got there any less valid. Or that criticising him means you don’t want him to succeed.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on October 02, 2020, 11:16:46 PMHe wasn't going to get us promoted until he did, but that was down to Grealish. He wasn't going to keep us up until he did, but that was down to lockdown. He couldn't attract big names until he did, but that was down to Terry. For someone who can't do anything he seems to have a lot happen regardless. It's like politics. You form an opinion and then confirmation bias has people looking for whatever can be interpreted as supporting evidence. Anything that doesn't support that view must be down to outside factors.
He wasn't going to get us promoted until he did, but that was down to Grealish. He wasn't going to keep us up until he did, but that was down to lockdown. He couldn't attract big names until he did, but that was down to Terry. For someone who can't do anything he seems to have a lot happen regardless.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on October 02, 2020, 11:16:46 PMHe wasn't going to get us promoted until he did, but that was down to Grealish. He wasn't going to keep us up until he did, but that was down to lockdown. He couldn't attract big names until he did, but that was down to Terry. For someone who can't do anything he seems to have a lot happen regardless. He must be very lucky Dave.I like lucky managers.
Quote from: RamboandBruno on October 03, 2020, 08:51:29 AMQuote from: themossman on October 03, 2020, 08:43:35 AMQuote from: OCD on October 03, 2020, 12:32:24 AMQuote from: dave.woodhall on October 02, 2020, 11:16:46 PMHe wasn't going to get us promoted until he did, but that was down to Grealish. He wasn't going to keep us up until he did, but that was down to lockdown. He couldn't attract big names until he did, but that was down to Terry. For someone who can't do anything he seems to have a lot happen regardless. It's like politics. You form an opinion and then confirmation bias has people looking for whatever can be interpreted as supporting evidence. Anything that doesn't support that view must be down to outside factors.Exactly this. There are pro and anti smith camps and in truth he’s given, and continues to give, evidence to both to support their cause. It’s true he got us promoted, which deserves much credit, also true that having the best player in the division back from injury and winning games on his own played a part. Impossible to separate these factors.It’s true he kept a poor squad up last year thanks to a great (overall) post lockdown run. It’s also true that he performed badly, overall, IMO, before lockdown, showing a lot of tactical naivety and intransigence, which put us in the position in the first place.I don’t think reeling out the the end results repeatedly makes the criticisms of how we got there any less valid. Or that criticising him means you don’t want him to succeed.Not disagreeing with your overall point. But Grealish didn’t win a single game on his own at any point. In the 10 game run to go up he was hugely influential, but wasn’t necessarily the best player in a fair number of those games, including the semi final away leg and final. SGM was just as influential in many of those games. SGM...Saint Gohn McGinn? Sven Goran Merikssen ?
I have immense respect for those who have built H and V into the source of good judgement, humour and pleasure it is today. I cannot rid myself of the nagging doubt that Dean Smith is either flawed or not yet fully fledged. It is indisputable that his managerial qualiies have taken us from the swamp of the lower Championship to at least the foothills of the sunlit uplands of the Premiership. Seventy percent of me believes he is the man to get us to a staging post from which we can unleash an assault on the peak. Then, with unfailing regularity we have games like Stoke and the Mr Hyde in me emerges. I am assailed with doubt that our future will be like our immediate past. I have never wanted a Villa manager to succeed as much as I want Dean to succeed. Liverpool is the perfect game to restore our spirits. Ours and the players.
Quote from: brian green on October 03, 2020, 08:30:30 AMI have immense respect for those who have built H and V into the source of good judgement, humour and pleasure it is today. I cannot rid myself of the nagging doubt that Dean Smith is either flawed or not yet fully fledged. It is indisputable that his managerial qualiies have taken us from the swamp of the lower Championship to at least the foothills of the sunlit uplands of the Premiership. Seventy percent of me believes he is the man to get us to a staging post from which we can unleash an assault on the peak. Then, with unfailing regularity we have games like Stoke and the Mr Hyde in me emerges. I am assailed with doubt that our future will be like our immediate past. I have never wanted a Villa manager to succeed as much as I want Dean to succeed. Liverpool is the perfect game to restore our spirits. Ours and the players.That doubt Brian, is based on the last decade at least of our history. Disappointment and not quite enough time after time. Even before then we were nearly men, the 00s and 90s were littered with what might have been moments. And yet we fell. Two League Cup wins are all well and good, but we should be aspiring to more, to more European nights. Time will tell if Smith can get us there, but so far he's met his brief, and he's learning and developing too. For once I don't doubt our owners intent, ability or bank balance either.
... I wasn't that bothered about the Stoke loss, and would gladly accept that for a positive result tomorrow.
All the Stoke result signified is that you can’t play all of that team together in the Premier League. For where we are at in our development we could carry a few of those players in some games and they wouldn’t let us down, helped by the higher quality we’ve now got in the rest of the the team. The big problem last season was that post Christmas we were having to play a load of them (or similar if including Drinkwater, Samatta etc) together out of necessity.