Could have got Danny Ings for Ł2m less than we paid for Wesley. Imagine if we did have a decent striker Jack's assist total would have been double figures easily. Ball played in to Davis for his miss v Arsenal would have been one if the guy knew how to score. Two new strikers, preferably at least one with Prem experience is a must this window. Cut our loses with Samatta for sure, keep Wesley as a backup
Quote from: Jon Crofts on July 28, 2020, 10:54:59 AMAnother several million going on compensation no doubt. Several million? How much do you think a Sporting Director makes?I don’t think he was shit. Some signings across his time at the club have worked out others haven’t. That also lies at the door of the manger and he developed them. And we all saw some absolutely dire use of tactics during the course of the season. So the responsibility for the success or failure of certain players shouldn’t be placed squarely at the door or Suso.
Another several million going on compensation no doubt.
It'd impossible to prove either way, but I do think we'd have been better off with Maupay, who cost a similar amount to Wesley. I think him linking up with the likes of Jack and McGinn would have seen him, and us, score more goals. Pitarch did confirm that we were interested in him, but we obviously plumped for Wesley instead.
It’s strange how we see things differently.I thought one of the few attributes Trezeguet does have is pace.He’s just not very good.
Suso responds via Guillem Balague Main points Suso asked what manager to replace Smith if required Suggested Houghton ,Javi Garcia and Bruno Large Purslow wanted Terry or Gerrard He wasn't there when signing Drinkwater it was Smith and Purslow Owners asked Suso for better quality players next season he established contacts but Purslow felt left out and relationship deteriorated Feels Himself and Smith taken criticism when Purslow is the issue [/quoteA lot of that makes very little sense probably file under bollocks]