collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Other Games 2025-26 by Monty
[Today at 02:41:51 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by ozzjim
[Today at 02:40:36 PM]


Zepiqueno Redmond by Olneythelonely
[Today at 02:39:54 PM]


Loanwatch 2025-26 by Mister E
[Today at 02:26:11 PM]


Europa League 2025-26 by Bent Neilsens Screamer
[Today at 02:05:13 PM]


Aston Villa v Crystal Palace Pre Match by RamboandBruno
[Today at 02:01:58 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 01:54:37 PM]


FFP by Grande Pablo
[Today at 01:39:15 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Jesús García Pitarch - binned  (Read 98063 times)

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37341
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Jesús García Pitarch - binned
« Reply #345 on: July 28, 2020, 12:15:14 PM »
Could have got Danny Ings for Ł2m less than we paid for Wesley. Imagine if we did have a decent striker Jack's assist total would have been double figures easily. Ball played in to Davis for his miss v Arsenal would have been one if the guy knew how to score. Two new strikers, preferably at least one with Prem experience is a must this window. Cut our loses with Samatta for sure, keep Wesley as a backup

No we couldn't, it was a loan in 2018 and converted to a permanent transfer last summer.

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Jesús García Pitarch - binned
« Reply #346 on: July 28, 2020, 12:41:08 PM »
It'd impossible to prove either way, but I do think we'd have been better off with Maupay, who cost a similar amount to Wesley.  I think him linking up with the likes of Jack and McGinn would have seen him, and us, score more goals.  Pitarch did confirm that we were interested in him, but we obviously plumped for Wesley instead.

Offline Lastfootstamper

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11634
  • Age: 59
  • Location: Greater Birmingham
  • GM : PCM
Re: Jesús García Pitarch - binned
« Reply #347 on: July 28, 2020, 12:42:48 PM »
Another several million going on compensation no doubt.

Several million? How much do you think a Sporting Director makes?

I don’t think he was shit. Some signings across his time at the club have worked out others haven’t. That also lies at the door of the manger and he developed them. And we all saw some absolutely dire use of tactics during the course of the season. So the responsibility for the success or failure of certain players shouldn’t be placed squarely at the door or Suso.

Which of Pitarch's inadequates that we'll look to let go will possibly emulate many of The Class Of 2016, if their lack of progression is down to the manager? Which ones were similarly hindered by our tactics? We'll keep those that have improved or that the coaching staff believe could still reach a sufficient level, and let all the others go if we can find suitors. I really don't envisage any of their departures ever coming back to bite us on the arse.

I don't see anything too suspect in this development. We're where I believe we wanted to be at this point in time, kicking off 2020/21 as a PL club. I dare say his position isn't the only one at the club that's up for review around now.

Offline Luke8

  • Member
  • Posts: 546
Re: Jesús García Pitarch - binned
« Reply #348 on: July 28, 2020, 12:46:44 PM »
It'd impossible to prove either way, but I do think we'd have been better off with Maupay, who cost a similar amount to Wesley.  I think him linking up with the likes of Jack and McGinn would have seen him, and us, score more goals.  Pitarch did confirm that we were interested in him, but we obviously plumped for Wesley instead.

Possibly, but their strike rates were similar overall. Think the fact Brighton only managed to sign him five days before the season started was probably a factor too. Would have been down to multiple factors but I don’t think we could have risked waiting that long.

Online Jon Crofts

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 21782
  • Location: Lost In The Supermarket
  • GM : PCM
Re: Jesús García Pitarch - binned
« Reply #349 on: July 28, 2020, 01:09:37 PM »
Contract expired so he was only on a 12 month gig after all it appears.

Offline tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15459
Re: Jesús García Pitarch - binned
« Reply #350 on: July 28, 2020, 01:48:03 PM »
It’s strange how we see things differently.
I thought one of the few attributes Trezeguet does have is pace.

He’s just not very good.

Don't think he is slow, but he hasn't got the electric pace that is now required in the top flight.  Scored some vital goals in the last few games for us, but shouldn't be in the starting XI come next season.

Offline David_Nab

  • Member
  • Posts: 4285
  • Location: Luton
  • GM : 24.12.2015
Re: Jesús García Pitarch - binned
« Reply #351 on: July 28, 2020, 01:51:19 PM »
Suso responds via Guillem Balague

Main points

Suso asked what manager to replace Smith if required Suggested Houghton ,Javi Garcia and Bruno Large
Purslow wanted Terry or Gerrard

He wasn't there when signing Drinkwater it was Smith and Purslow

Owners asked Suso for better quality players next season he established contacts but Purslow felt left out and relationship deteriorated

Feels Himself and Smith taken criticism when Purslow is the issue

Online Drummond

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33046
  • Location: Everywhere, and nowhere.
  • GM : 11.10.2025
Re: Jesús García Pitarch - binned
« Reply #352 on: July 28, 2020, 01:58:26 PM »
Bloody hell.

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 73073
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: Jesús García Pitarch - binned
« Reply #353 on: July 28, 2020, 02:00:28 PM »
If Purslow wants Terry or Gerrard in charge and thinks Drinkwater is still a footballer, get him gone, too.

Offline garyellis

  • Member
  • Posts: 1436
Re: Jesús García Pitarch - binned
« Reply #354 on: July 28, 2020, 02:03:46 PM »
Suso responds via Guillem Balague

Main points

Suso asked what manager to replace Smith if required Suggested Houghton ,Javi Garcia and Bruno Large
Purslow wanted Terry or Gerrard

He wasn't there when signing Drinkwater it was Smith and Purslow

Owners asked Suso for better quality players next season he established contacts but Purslow felt left out and relationship deteriorated

Feels Himself and Smith taken criticism when Purslow is the issue

[/quoteA lot of that makes very little sense probably file under bollocks]

Online Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 23033
  • Location: Salop
Re: Jesús García Pitarch - binned
« Reply #355 on: July 28, 2020, 02:06:30 PM »
Also suggesting that he was in London trying to get Nzonzi while Drinkwater was signed.

All fun and games...

Offline Scott Nielsen

  • Member
  • Posts: 2972
  • Location: Singapore
Re: Jesús García Pitarch - binned
« Reply #356 on: July 28, 2020, 02:07:00 PM »
If that is mostly true then our most urgent challenge is the CEO position.

Offline VinnieChase84

  • Member
  • Posts: 3038
  • GM : May, 2012
Re: Jesús García Pitarch - binned
« Reply #357 on: July 28, 2020, 02:10:45 PM »
Will be he said she said and a certain amount of face saving going on.
Kalinic
Tom Carroll
Trezeguet
Nakamba
Samatta
Targett
Baston
Wesley

All 100% Suso signings
 

Online ozzjim

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 31149
  • Location: Here.
  • GM : 30.08.2022
Re: Jesús García Pitarch - binned
« Reply #358 on: July 28, 2020, 02:18:00 PM »
Isn't it amazing how these people are always signing some amazing player just before they leave.

And the list of managers from him and Purslow is as uninspiring as it gets. Whoever replaces Suso will be a Purslow man you would think.

As for the owners not being at a game for 7 months, well... not like the world has had anything else to deal with in that time is it.

Offline frank black

  • Member
  • Posts: 3687
Re: Jesús García Pitarch - binned
« Reply #359 on: July 28, 2020, 02:18:13 PM »
Guillem Ballague

It may seem strange that Suso García Pitarch leaves Aston Villa after promoting the team two years earlier than planned, taking him to a cup final and guaranteeing his presence in the Premier (that is, sports success is undeniable), but it is not I pray all that glitters ..

CEO Christian Purslow did not always readily accept the owners' relationship with the sports director. In case Dean Smith had to be replaced, he was asked for advice (Suso suggested Javi Gracia, Chris Hughton, Bruno Lage, Purslow wanted Steven Gerrard or John Terry)

Without the presence of the owners (they haven't been to see the team for seven months), Purslow (who does not live in Birmingham) covers a lot of ground. Thus the signing of Drinkwater was his and Dean Smith's (Suso was in London signing Nzonzi)

The owners asked Suso for a quality jump in the squad and on the bench for the following season. Contacts were established with high-level coaches eager to get on the bandwagon. But the CEO felt sidelined and the relationship with Suso deteriorated.

Smith and Suso have received media criticism for passing on interesting information that protects Purslow. Difficult to work in these conditions. Suso has preferred not to continue despite having one more year of contract, and he told the owners a while ago.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal