Quote from: Clampy on June 30, 2019, 10:39:52 AMQuote from: andrew08 on June 30, 2019, 10:36:34 AMQuote from: TopDeck113 on June 30, 2019, 10:28:05 AMQuote from: cdbullyweefan on June 30, 2019, 10:26:40 AMYes. What percentage? And is it up to a maximum amount?I don’t think I’ve seen one more than 20% of profit. So less than £10 million. It would be great business by everyone, and set up by Steve Bruce in fairness to him. I’d be tempted in all honesty, get that Leeds fella or the equivalent and move on. I’d rather not, but this is where we’re at right now. Bigger clubs can still click their fingers.So you'd sell one of our best players just because a big team supposedly put in a bid so we can 'move on'? I’d rather we didn’t sell him, but I’d hope we’d ‘move on’ if we did.Or we could sit and mope about it, is that what you expect us to do? I’d hope we’d signed his replacement and have this eventuality pre planned.
Quote from: andrew08 on June 30, 2019, 10:36:34 AMQuote from: TopDeck113 on June 30, 2019, 10:28:05 AMQuote from: cdbullyweefan on June 30, 2019, 10:26:40 AMYes. What percentage? And is it up to a maximum amount?I don’t think I’ve seen one more than 20% of profit. So less than £10 million. It would be great business by everyone, and set up by Steve Bruce in fairness to him. I’d be tempted in all honesty, get that Leeds fella or the equivalent and move on. I’d rather not, but this is where we’re at right now. Bigger clubs can still click their fingers.So you'd sell one of our best players just because a big team supposedly put in a bid so we can 'move on'?
Quote from: TopDeck113 on June 30, 2019, 10:28:05 AMQuote from: cdbullyweefan on June 30, 2019, 10:26:40 AMYes. What percentage? And is it up to a maximum amount?I don’t think I’ve seen one more than 20% of profit. So less than £10 million. It would be great business by everyone, and set up by Steve Bruce in fairness to him. I’d be tempted in all honesty, get that Leeds fella or the equivalent and move on. I’d rather not, but this is where we’re at right now. Bigger clubs can still click their fingers.
Quote from: cdbullyweefan on June 30, 2019, 10:26:40 AMYes. What percentage? And is it up to a maximum amount?
Yes.
John McGinn is a brilliant, brilliant player for us - and almost certainly essential if we're to consolidate as a premier league force this coming season.BUT - do you really think ManU would spend £50m on him to add to a midfield that includes Pogba, Mata, Herrera, Lindgard, and Matic and think McGinn in the one who helps them go from outside the champions league places to title contenders? I don't.Next summer, after he's spent a year showing everyone what he can do in the top flight, maybe - but for a team hoping to make up a thirty point gap on the champions, I just don't see it. Can you imagine the fan reaction if they spent £50m on a player who spent last season in the championship for a team that didn't even go up automatically? It just doesn't pass the smell test. At all.
I’m probably in a minority here, but I’d take £50m for him. Being honest, he isn’t THAT good and if it meant we then used the money to bring Philips, another midfielder and say Tuanzebe in, it would be great business.
Quote from: Risso on June 30, 2019, 08:56:06 AMI’m probably in a minority here, but I’d take £50m for him. Being honest, he isn’t THAT good and if it meant we then used the money to bring Philips, another midfielder and say Tuanzebe in, it would be great business.I agree.
Quote from: Risso on June 30, 2019, 08:56:06 AMI’m probably in a minority here, but I’d take £50m for him. Being honest, he isn’t THAT good and if it meant we then used the money to bring Philips, another midfielder and say Tuanzebe in, it would be great business.Phillips and Tuanzebe would be the best part of £30m, taking into account the Leeds valuation for Phillips.Who would you get that is better than McGinn for the remaining money?I agree.
Yeah, Wolves players like Neves, Jota and the manager seem to slip under the radar. Having said that, I think SJM is better than Neves!