Quote from: Duncan Shaw on July 03, 2018, 12:15:59 PMQuote from: Clark W Griswold on July 03, 2018, 12:10:50 PMCorrect me if I'm wrong but wouldn't that £30m have gone to Tone and not the club itself. No guarantee he'd put that back into the club, but I suppose it would depend how much investment the new part owners would want to stick into the club. Probably not a lot if Tone still owns 70% of it. I think there is always going to be a lot of bullshit and misinformation around in these times, it's difficult to know what to believe.The Mail have embellished this old news today with more details of the American bid. Apparently they wanted to sell Jack for £40m minimum and use that money as working capital.Sounds quite sensible under the circumstances, apart from the fact that we won't get £40m for Jack. Maybe £30m if there is enough interest.
Quote from: Clark W Griswold on July 03, 2018, 12:10:50 PMCorrect me if I'm wrong but wouldn't that £30m have gone to Tone and not the club itself. No guarantee he'd put that back into the club, but I suppose it would depend how much investment the new part owners would want to stick into the club. Probably not a lot if Tone still owns 70% of it. I think there is always going to be a lot of bullshit and misinformation around in these times, it's difficult to know what to believe.The Mail have embellished this old news today with more details of the American bid. Apparently they wanted to sell Jack for £40m minimum and use that money as working capital.
Correct me if I'm wrong but wouldn't that £30m have gone to Tone and not the club itself. No guarantee he'd put that back into the club, but I suppose it would depend how much investment the new part owners would want to stick into the club. Probably not a lot if Tone still owns 70% of it. I think there is always going to be a lot of bullshit and misinformation around in these times, it's difficult to know what to believe.
Quote from: Clark W Griswold on July 03, 2018, 12:20:06 PMQuote from: Duncan Shaw on July 03, 2018, 12:15:59 PMQuote from: Clark W Griswold on July 03, 2018, 12:10:50 PMCorrect me if I'm wrong but wouldn't that £30m have gone to Tone and not the club itself. No guarantee he'd put that back into the club, but I suppose it would depend how much investment the new part owners would want to stick into the club. Probably not a lot if Tone still owns 70% of it. I think there is always going to be a lot of bullshit and misinformation around in these times, it's difficult to know what to believe.The Mail have embellished this old news today with more details of the American bid. Apparently they wanted to sell Jack for £40m minimum and use that money as working capital.Sounds quite sensible under the circumstances, apart from the fact that we won't get £40m for Jack. Maybe £30m if there is enough interest.The story I read suggested that they didn't want to sell Jack, so were thinking of setting the price at £40m and wouldn't sell for less. Which strikes me as quite sensible.
but have we? Or is it more Tone speak
Quote from: boozey182 on July 03, 2018, 12:42:36 PMQuote from: Clark W Griswold on July 03, 2018, 12:20:06 PMQuote from: Duncan Shaw on July 03, 2018, 12:15:59 PMQuote from: Clark W Griswold on July 03, 2018, 12:10:50 PMCorrect me if I'm wrong but wouldn't that £30m have gone to Tone and not the club itself. No guarantee he'd put that back into the club, but I suppose it would depend how much investment the new part owners would want to stick into the club. Probably not a lot if Tone still owns 70% of it. I think there is always going to be a lot of bullshit and misinformation around in these times, it's difficult to know what to believe.The Mail have embellished this old news today with more details of the American bid. Apparently they wanted to sell Jack for £40m minimum and use that money as working capital.Sounds quite sensible under the circumstances, apart from the fact that we won't get £40m for Jack. Maybe £30m if there is enough interest.The story I read suggested that they didn't want to sell Jack, so were thinking of setting the price at £40m and wouldn't sell for less. Which strikes me as quite sensible.If true, and if they would be wealthy enough and willing to invest so that we don't need to sell Jack it would be both sensible and very exciting for us fans. I hope it turns out to be right.
It's similar to what I've been saying most of the time, although I did envisage having to sell Grealish no matter what. If it turns out that we don't, our financial position will have taken a hell of a turn for the better. With new owners I suppose anything is possible.
Quote from: Clark W Griswold on July 03, 2018, 01:25:38 PMIt's similar to what I've been saying most of the time, although I did envisage having to sell Grealish no matter what. If it turns out that we don't, our financial position will have taken a hell of a turn for the better. With new owners I suppose anything is possible.Wouldn't new owners still be hampered by the FFP situation though and not able to invest even if the money was there?
Quote from: Clark W Griswold on July 03, 2018, 12:20:06 PMQuote from: Duncan Shaw on July 03, 2018, 12:15:59 PMQuote from: Clark W Griswold on July 03, 2018, 12:10:50 PMCorrect me if I'm wrong but wouldn't that £30m have gone to Tone and not the club itself. No guarantee he'd put that back into the club, but I suppose it would depend how much investment the new part owners would want to stick into the club. Probably not a lot if Tone still owns 70% of it. I think there is always going to be a lot of bullshit and misinformation around in these times, it's difficult to know what to believe.The Mail have embellished this old news today with more details of the American bid. Apparently they wanted to sell Jack for £40m minimum and use that money as working capital.Sounds quite sensible under the circumstances, apart from the fact that we won't get £40m for Jack. Maybe £30m if there is enough interest.The story I read suggested that they didn't want to sell Jack, so were thinking of setting the price at £40m and wouldn't sell for less. Which strikes me as quite sensible.How people know this is another question, of course. As is whether anyone will get a chance to implement such a plan. But it gave me a bit of hope. The same story suggested that there were two other parties interested in buying the club, both of whom have money to invest.If any of this is true, things could look very positive quite quickly. The lack of any noise coming out of Villa seems to suggest that something could be quite close. Or that there's no one left at the club and everything is utterly hopeless... I'm going to choose to believe the more positive outlook at the moment. Will make for a more pleasant summer, I reckon.
We've secured a £50m loan which is enough to keep us going for 12 months or while we try and sell the club.I would rather keep Jack as I think we're far more likely to be promoted than not with him in the side.