If he's been brought in to fill the void on the left then that's fine. If he's been brought in to play in on the right or behind a striker then it is a questionable use of resources to be honest.
Quote from: tomd2103 on August 25, 2017, 04:53:46 PMIf he's been brought in to fill the void on the left then that's fine. If he's been brought in to play in on the right or behind a striker then it is a questionable use of resources to be honest. His interview states he was played out of position at West Ham and that his position he must be played in to get the best out of him is "Off to the right or in behind the striker"6-6.10 https://youtu.be/hTqJ2fdDW5c
Revealed: How much of Snodgrass' wages will West Ham pay after Aston Villa loan switch?The latest West Ham transfer news sees the Hammers set to part-fund Robert Snodgrass' move to Aston VillaWest Ham will contribute around £18,000 a week towards the wages of Robert Snodgrass after he completed his loan move to Aston Villa, according to Hammers transfer guru ExWHUEmployee.Snodgrass has fallen out of favour quickly in east London and was shopped around this summer, having only joined the Hammers back in January for £10m.In a column for The West Ham Way, the former West Ham staffer - who has gained a cult following on Twitter for providing transfer insights - has claimed that the Hammers will pay 30% of the Scotman's £60,000 a week wages.
Playing him off the striker makes sense and also makes sense he probably wasn't a priority until Grealish got injured.
Quote from: Matt C on August 26, 2017, 03:21:23 PMPlaying him off the striker makes sense and also makes sense he probably wasn't a priority until Grealish got injured. I'd have completely agreed 10 days ago But hourihane and Onomah both getting forward from midfield looks pretty promising to me
With your respected reputation for moderation Chris, you may live to regret saying that.