Why would a manager agree to come in on the basis that if he successfully achieves his objective he'll be sacked?
Quote from: Des Little on October 08, 2016, 09:10:21 PMFcuk me folks, let's get a bit of perspective here. We need to focus on winning more than we lose before anything else. That in itself is massive progress. So the answer is appoint a manager with 36% win ratio?
Fcuk me folks, let's get a bit of perspective here. We need to focus on winning more than we lose before anything else. That in itself is massive progress.
Quote from: olaftab on October 08, 2016, 09:23:12 PMQuote from: Des Little on October 08, 2016, 09:10:21 PMFcuk me folks, let's get a bit of perspective here. We need to focus on winning more than we lose before anything else. That in itself is massive progress. So the answer is appoint a manager with 36% win ratio?Did I say I wanted Bruce? Edit: Can you tell me our current win rate?
I'm literally sat here drinking Oxford Gold and laughing at the suggestion Brucey agrees to come, get us promoted and then agrees graciously to be sacked.
Dyche = Exciting. Bruce = Boring. Last season Burnley scored 72 and conceded 35. Hull scored 69 and conceded 35.
Quote from: PaulWinch again on October 08, 2016, 09:14:50 PMQuote from: Richard E on October 08, 2016, 09:11:08 PMWhy would a manager agree to come in on the basis that if he successfully achieves his objective he'll be sacked? Well I imagine you don't position it like that. So you'd have to give him a longer contract than you wanted him to have, and then pay him over the odds to leave. Just strikes me as a very odd strategy.
Quote from: Richard E on October 08, 2016, 09:11:08 PMWhy would a manager agree to come in on the basis that if he successfully achieves his objective he'll be sacked? Well I imagine you don't position it like that.
Quote from: PeterWithesShin on October 08, 2016, 09:40:43 PMDyche = Exciting. Bruce = Boring. Last season Burnley scored 72 and conceded 35. Hull scored 69 and conceded 35. That must be a lie. Along with the fact that Dyche has never been relegated from the PL either.
I think the idea of us ditching Bruce once/if promotion is achieved because we'd need someone sexier in the Premier League is wishful thinking. Like we all wished Sherwood had gone before last season started, rewarding "success" with sacking is rarely done by anyone. He would have to go through a turgid spell of us not winning games in the top flight before being shoved.