collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Mile Jedinak - Released  (Read 193927 times)

Offline Ads

  • Member
  • Posts: 42898
  • Location: The Breeze
  • GM : 17.04.2024
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #585 on: October 19, 2016, 06:43:32 PM »
Came into it a bit more second half going forwards. Looked better, as did the whole side, with three centrally.

Offline cheltenhamlion

  • Member
  • Posts: 18734
  • Location: Pedmore, Stourbridge
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #586 on: October 19, 2016, 07:12:14 PM »
I am surprised nobody has mentioned this 3 in the middle idea before. It looks promising.

Offline Matt Collins

  • Member
  • Posts: 10884
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #587 on: October 22, 2016, 08:44:36 PM »
Was he better today?

Offline in exile

  • Member
  • Posts: 2854
  • Age: 64
  • Location: Tamworth
  • GM : 22.07.2022
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #588 on: October 23, 2016, 10:28:23 AM »

Online Dante Lavelli

  • Member
  • Posts: 10768
  • GM : 25.05.2023
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #589 on: October 23, 2016, 11:36:55 PM »
I am surprised nobody has mentioned this 3 in the middle idea before. It looks promising.

Boodum tish..

I guess, because Bruce has no allegiance to the players, signed or otherwise, he can see things more clearly, yet a  3 in midfield seems so obvious.

Offline alan_clarke

  • Member
  • Posts: 792
  • Location: London
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #590 on: October 24, 2016, 11:35:02 AM »
Was he better today?

Not to me

Nor me, game passed him by. Scott Parker looked far superior in the battle of the 30 something midfielders.

Offline oldtimernow

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3743
  • GM : 29.01.2026
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #591 on: October 24, 2016, 11:42:57 AM »
Listening to the commentary on Saturday Parker was mentioned numerous times as either passing badly or dispossessed by a Villa player.

Offline alan_clarke

  • Member
  • Posts: 792
  • Location: London
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #592 on: October 24, 2016, 11:56:11 AM »
Listening to the commentary on Saturday Parker was mentioned numerous times as either passing badly or dispossessed by a Villa player.

Even if so, this doesn't completely invalidate my point!

Online Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 22890
  • Location: Salop
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #593 on: October 24, 2016, 12:15:18 PM »
It only occurred to me late in the second half that the Parker they were referring to was Scott Parker, the midfielder from the past!

Offline Chris Smith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36442
  • Location: At home
  • GM : 20.07.2026
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #594 on: October 24, 2016, 12:39:01 PM »
Listening to the commentary on Saturday Parker was mentioned numerous times as either passing badly or dispossessed by a Villa player.

First half Parker was controlling the game, in the second we, and more specifically Gardner, pressured him more and his influence was negated. A plus point for Bruce I would say, spotting the problem and making the adjustment to fix it.

Offline Hookeysmith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13322
  • Age: 61
  • Location: One hand on the handle of the mad / sane door
  • GM : 06.02.2026
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #595 on: October 24, 2016, 01:15:16 PM »
Listening to the commentary on Saturday Parker was mentioned numerous times as either passing badly or dispossessed by a Villa player.

First half Parker was controlling the game, in the second we, and more specifically Gardner, pressured him more and his influence was negated. A plus point for Bruce I would say, spotting the problem and making the adjustment to fix it.

Controlling the game in their own half and about 4ft away from their own penalty box. I thought Lambert was the Manager it was so tedious

Offline Chris Smith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36442
  • Location: At home
  • GM : 20.07.2026
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #596 on: October 24, 2016, 02:13:10 PM »
Listening to the commentary on Saturday Parker was mentioned numerous times as either passing badly or dispossessed by a Villa player.

First half Parker was controlling the game, in the second we, and more specifically Gardner, pressured him more and his influence was negated. A plus point for Bruce I would say, spotting the problem and making the adjustment to fix it.

Controlling the game in their own half and about 4ft away from their own penalty box. I thought Lambert was the Manager it was so tedious

Absolutely but when you have set up for a point that is just what you need.

Offline UK Redsox

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 42863
  • Location: Forest of Dean & Fenway Park
  • GM : 10.02.2026
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #597 on: October 24, 2016, 02:31:05 PM »
If Kod had been playing central to start the game, I don't think that Parker would have had as much time to control the games / bore the bejezzus out of us. Harassing the opposition just isn't Rudy's game

Parker was so deep that if Bacuna/Gardner/Jedi had stepped up to him, they'd have been way out of position.

Later in the game, with Kod central, Parker didn't have as much time

Offline He wears a magic hat

  • Member
  • Posts: 265
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #598 on: October 24, 2016, 03:54:12 PM »
The first half was nauseating. I'm fed up with teams playing this pathetic keep ball in their own half. What purpose does it serve. Fulham actually looked as though they had one or two players that could cause us problems if they had played with any attacking intent.

When teams do this I want us to be brave enough and throw caution to the wind, press as a team and try to inject some life into proceedings.


Offline Old Kodjia

  • Member
  • Posts: 344
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #599 on: October 24, 2016, 04:01:24 PM »
The first half was nauseating. I'm fed up with teams playing this pathetic keep ball in their own half. What purpose does it serve. Fulham actually looked as though they had one or two players that could cause us problems if they had played with any attacking intent.

When teams do this I want us to be brave enough and throw caution to the wind, press as a team and try to inject some life into proceedings.

It was ultimately their downfall as they played one back pass too many.  ;D

I'm still on the fence with Jedinak.  I certainly think it's too early to write him off.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal