collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Mile Jedinak - Released  (Read 193881 times)

Offline sickbeggar

  • Member
  • Posts: 7781
  • Location: Universities are full of people educated beyond their intelligence
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #495 on: September 25, 2016, 12:07:54 PM »
I tend to agree. Jedinak was awful. I think its a transfer stinker though i see RDM's reasoning of bringing in an experienced head at the back-end of his career. I just think its 12 months too late

Offline TaipeiVillain

  • Member
  • Posts: 6
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #496 on: September 25, 2016, 12:16:23 PM »
Jedinak or Gardner - there lies the problem.
So many forwards to choose from, so few midfielders. Misallocation of resources. It'll come good in the next transfer window, no doubt.

Offline wittonwarrior

  • Member
  • Posts: 4610
  • Age: 65
  • Location: Knotty Ash (really)
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #497 on: September 25, 2016, 12:20:22 PM »
Give me cleverly any day

Offline brian green

  • Member
  • Posts: 18357
  • Age: 87
  • Location: Nice France
  • GM : 19.06.2020
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #498 on: September 25, 2016, 12:21:05 PM »
Welcome TaipeiVillain.  Good first post.  Too many forwards not enough midfielders indeed.

Offline Matt Collins

  • Member
  • Posts: 10884
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #499 on: September 25, 2016, 12:47:19 PM »
Dare I say it, we've played better with Gardner in the side, our poorest performances and down turn has coincided with jedinak in the team.

Don't be so ridiculous. Even though Jedinak has been a disappointment to me so far he is head and shoulders above Gardner (my opinion of course)

Tell  me which game Gardner was worse than Jedinak was yday? Genuinely

Offline Nunkin1965

  • Member
  • Posts: 3440
  • Age: 59
  • Location: Planet Earth
  • This is only a problem.
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #500 on: September 25, 2016, 01:00:17 PM »
I know it's a bit of an outrageous and controversial concept on here but I'm willing to (draws deep breath and adds dramatic pause Bill Hicks style) be a bit patient and give him some time to get sorted. There I've said it. I know its unpopular and I'm in the minority but thats how I'm seeing it.

Offline Jimbo

  • Member
  • Posts: 11606
  • Location: Hell
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #501 on: September 25, 2016, 01:13:53 PM »
I know it's a bit of an outrageous and controversial concept on here but I'm willing to (draws deep breath and adds dramatic pause Bill Hicks style) be a bit patient and give him some time to get sorted. There I've said it. I know its unpopular and I'm in the minority but thats how I'm seeing it.

Some sense, at last. Give him time, find him a role in a settled midfield unit, and see how he does. I think he might work out fine just in front of the defence as part of a three with Tshibola and someone else who can kick a football (his first name isn't Ashley).

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #502 on: September 25, 2016, 01:17:38 PM »
It would be absolutely delightful to sign a player who just came into the team and got on with things, you know, rather than taking three years to settle.  Especially when the player currently being crticised is 32.

Offline Ron Manager

  • Member
  • Posts: 5710
  • Location: Staffordshire
  • GM : 03.04.2016
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #503 on: September 25, 2016, 03:42:56 PM »
It would be absolutely delightful to sign a player who just came into the team and got on with things, you know, rather than taking three years to settle.  Especially when the player currently being crticised is 32.
Such a player appears to be Kodjia

Offline ldavfc4eva

  • Member
  • Posts: 1749
  • Age: 39
  • Location: Standing at the station, in need of education
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #504 on: September 25, 2016, 03:47:50 PM »
Looked off the pace to me, sluggish and tired. He should be the anchor man in a three for me with Tish and Westwood either side. Or try grealish instead of Westwood and see how he fares.

Offline Matt Collins

  • Member
  • Posts: 10884
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #505 on: September 25, 2016, 04:10:42 PM »
Definitely needs time

I'm just concerned because a) I always thought he looked a bit rubbish and he's playing up to all my fears and b) I thought he might be rusty but he wasn't, he looked physically and technically so far off the pace of the game that you worry he can get up to speed

I felt similarly when I first saw gestede play 90 mins of premier league football. It was like "oh, I'm struggling to see how you'll ever do it"

Hope I'm wrong though. He was helping drive us on innhe last twenty. It's when he has players around him that I worry you

Offline Dave Cooper please

  • Member
  • Posts: 29991
  • Location: In a medium sized launch tethered off Biarritz
  • GM : 20.04.2019
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #506 on: September 25, 2016, 08:13:54 PM »
What is it with Villa's innate ability to turn players we know are decent into utter fucksquirrels within days?

Offline LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 35544
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #507 on: September 25, 2016, 08:19:10 PM »
Dare I say it, we've played better with Gardner in the side, our poorest performances and down turn has coincided with jedinak in the team.

The jury were swayed until the defendant held up a picture of Ashley Westwood, and then the case was thrown out of court.

Offline JUAN PABLO

  • Member
  • Posts: 34300
  • Location: hinckley
    • http://www.scifimafia.net
  • GM : Aug, 2014
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #508 on: September 25, 2016, 08:31:13 PM »
Jedi will be fine

he will do well for us ..

Offline oswald funkletrumpet

  • Member
  • Posts: 2157
  • Location: Hayley Green
Re: Mile Jedinak - signed
« Reply #509 on: September 25, 2016, 09:36:28 PM »
Jedi will be fine

he will do well for us ..

what as?

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal