Chelsea were 3rd when they got rid of Di Matteo, 23 pts from 11 games.
I really cannot understand people justifying RDM as the best choice on the basis he is now favourite. Who selected him before he was in the frame? His wins with Chelsea were with an established team on multi million pound contracts, a totally different situation to Villa, therefore totally irrelevant.It has to be Moyes for me. An ideal long term solution.
I have clearly stated i would prefer Moyes. I also think Rodgers is a good shout. If it came to Di Matteo or Pearson it would be a tough call as i can see the merit of Pearson but would prefer Di Matteo. People are just pointing out a guy that had got promoted won the fa cup and Champs league is a decent shout.
Quote from: lovejoy on May 20, 2016, 06:29:56 AMI really cannot understand people justifying RDM as the best choice on the basis he is now favourite. Who selected him before he was in the frame? His wins with Chelsea were with an established team on multi million pound contracts, a totally different situation to Villa, therefore totally irrelevant.It has to be Moyes for me. An ideal long term solution.Who here has been saying he's the best choice? All people have really done is point out that he's achieved some pretty decent things which make any hiring reasonable - previous success with obtaining promotion from the Championship, shouldn't be out of touch with the modern game and a reputation for decent football.