To clarify, I'm talking about the spine of the team, Guzan, Hutton, lescott, Richardson, Westwood, Agbonlahor particularly. Bacuna.
1.3 points per game will see us on 39 points and almost certainly staying up. 1.4 sees us on 41/42. Champions League form my arse. Unless someone has finished 4th on 53 points (which is 1.4 per game).
GuzanRichards Okore Clark Amavi Sanchez Veretout. Gana Gil Adama Ayew. I'd go with this on Sunday.
I keep seeing people complimenting Gestede's performance last night, from anonymous bloggers all the way up to Gary Neville on Sky. I have no idea what they saw. The guy just lurched about chaotically as usual, and even worse his heading (the only reason for picking him) was terrible - his awful flick-ons found no Villa players, his shots were terrible, he never kept the ball when it came to him, he's too slow to press effectively and missed a really good chance to make it 2-2. If he's missing that chance, and not heading the ball to team-mates or holding it up, then what's the point of him being in the team?
Quote from: Monty on November 03, 2015, 04:43:08 PMI think it was Gil who led to the team looking better, not Gestede. I thought Spurs handled him with laughable ease for the most part.Laughable ease? I doubt they were laughing when he managed to outjump Lloris to win the ball with his head. Or when Vertonghen had to make a last-ditch challenge to block his goalbound shot. As for his flicks not reaching Villa players, I would be more inclined to attribute that no no Villa player anticipating the flick than expecting Gestede's ability in the air.
I think it was Gil who led to the team looking better, not Gestede. I thought Spurs handled him with laughable ease for the most part.
Just a little comment about flick ons. The good Strikers actually direct their flick ons, the bad ones let the ball bounce off their heads and put it down to no one ever reading it properly. You can't just head the ball anywhere and expect your co-striker or runners to get on the end of it, you have to put the ball in to certain zones if you can that you know your runners have been told to look out for or gamble on.
For whaty it's worth, I hope Remi gives this line up a try or, something close: Guzan Richards Crespo Okore Amavi Traore Sanchez Veretout Gueye Gil AyewSubs: Hutton, Grealish, Kozak, Sinclair, BunnWe can all tinker around with a player here or there but, I honestly think something approaching the above would give all us long suffering supporters a lift. In view of his pace, would like to see Richards at RB and, with Traore's pace as well at least we could try something a little different instead of the garbage we've had so far.
Quote from: aj2k77 on November 03, 2015, 05:34:12 PMJust a little comment about flick ons. The good Strikers actually direct their flick ons, the bad ones let the ball bounce off their heads and put it down to no one ever reading it properly. You can't just head the ball anywhere and expect your co-striker or runners to get on the end of it, you have to put the ball in to certain zones if you can that you know your runners have been told to look out for or gamble on.This is down to a lack of coaching. What you're talking about is a familiarity with each others game that needs to be worked on and then if the runs are wrong or the headers are wrong you can address them and find a way for them to work together. Pundits regularly comment on 'training ground moves' when they're direct from set pieces but you can do just as many of them in open play, you just practice in specific zones/situations and concentrate on movement, both attackers trying to create space and defenders coordinating to stop those gaps. We fail at both right now with too many players finding gaps around our box and us always looking outnumbered going forward. That, and basic skills, should be the core focus of our training for the next few weeks, and slowly ramp up the work rate as well to get us to the point where we're not seeing players looking out on their feet after 70-75minutes (although this has improved a little in the last couple of weeks).
Quote from: Monty on November 03, 2015, 04:43:08 PMI think it was Gil who led to the team looking better, not Gestede. I thought Spurs handled him with laughable ease for the most part.Laughable ease?? Your kidding right? They struggled greatly with his aerial threat.He is no Benteke for sure but he can be very to us if we play to his strengths. He can cause havoc with the right service and given the chance with some decent tactics from Remi I think other players-especially Ayew- can reap the benefits.My glass is still half full. VTID
"It was such a poor start for Aston Villa. The obvious one was Clark getting out-muscled by Dembele in the channel."I have no idea why Joleon Lescott is not his side of his man and Kieran Richardson on the far side... They're all stood outside the line of the Tottenham players."To start with, the three are the wrong side of their men. I can't understand why you would mark that side of your man when the ball was where it was."We've talked about why Lescott didn't get across or the left-back doesn't get across or why Clark is in the situation in the first place. It's because they're all in the wrong position - they're all in bad positions."It's patently obvious the ball's going down the channel so to start with he shouldn't even let him have the ball in that channel, he should be stood in there waiting for it. Joleon Lescott is too far away from it, partly because he is in the wrong position to start with."It's brilliant work from Dembele, but I have to say from Aston Villa's point of view, this is under-12s and under 13s and 14s with this sort of defending."Forget the one-on-one when he gets rolled I'm talking about the defenders not getting goal side of their men."That is under-14s and under 12s that's when you get told that sort of thing. I've no idea why all three of them would be in bad positions like that."They improved second half Villa. They were working from a pretty low base."They got to a point where you thought 'actually there's a game on here'. They had a shot just before they scored that hit the post."
Quote from: The Edge on November 03, 2015, 07:14:47 PMQuote from: Monty on November 03, 2015, 04:43:08 PMI think it was Gil who led to the team looking better, not Gestede. I thought Spurs handled him with laughable ease for the most part.Laughable ease?? Your kidding right? They struggled greatly with his aerial threat.He is no Benteke for sure but he can be very to us if we play to his strengths. He can cause havoc with the right service and given the chance with some decent tactics from Remi I think other players-especially Ayew- can reap the benefits.My glass is still half full. VTID Thing is, no decent tactics involving the rest of our players involve Gestede. We're not a Pulis team. And no, I'm not kidding about the 'laughable ease' - he scared them once, with a good ball in, and fluffed a chance he should have scored easily. Other than that, what 'havoc' did he cause? I saw him flicking the ball to Vertonghen a lot, as well as some miscontrols and deflected shots from distance going wide. No way was that 'havoc', not in a million years.