He might well do very well in another setting, but as much as we might wish to see 20 odd of the current squad shown the door, somewhere between 15 and 20 of them will still be here come the start of August. That will be around 60-80% of next season's squad who he'll potentially have some credibility issues with and it's a big ask to turn that around quickly enough for what we're looking to achieve.
Quote from: Villa in Denmark on March 24, 2016, 10:35:59 AMHe might well do very well in another setting, but as much as we might wish to see 20 odd of the current squad shown the door, somewhere between 15 and 20 of them will still be here come the start of August. That will be around 60-80% of next season's squad who he'll potentially have some credibility issues with and it's a big ask to turn that around quickly enough for what we're looking to achieve.You're probably right about that, but it would still be hugely depressing. Relegation should be the perfect opportunity for an extensive clear-out. If you're sitting about 15th in the Premier League and your shit, unwanted players are on nice fat contracts, they're not going to be motivated to leave. That's the main problem - they won't accept the lower wages offered by potential suitor clubs.I don't know which of our players have relegation clauses, but the prospect of playing in an unfashionable division for significantly reduced wages should hopefully inspire more than a few of them to seek pastures new.
if we hire a manager to fit the type of players we have, we are in very real trouble indeed.7-8 of our so called "senior" players need to be read the riot act, and then they either a) start putting in the effort and attitude required, b) fail that, sold, or c) fail that, paid off and told to never show their face ever again near VP/BH. And then, please, stop singing players at or near the end of their lives to multi year contracts.
Quote from: gpbarr on March 26, 2016, 05:56:39 PMif we hire a manager to fit the type of players we have, we are in very real trouble indeed.7-8 of our so called "senior" players need to be read the riot act, and then they either a) start putting in the effort and attitude required, b) fail that, sold, or c) fail that, paid off and told to never show their face ever again near VP/BH. And then, please, stop singing players at or near the end of their lives to multi year contracts. Isn't it the manager's job to read the riot act and to drop players who don't put the effort in? Garde can't do anything about the off field shambles he walked into, but I'd expect any manager to play the alpha male and start banging heads together. I can't see any evidence that he's done that which is why I want him to go. Seems to me that he's lost the dressing room, assuming he ever found it.
Quote from: Chico Hamilton III on March 28, 2016, 11:43:26 AMQuote from: gpbarr on March 26, 2016, 05:56:39 PMif we hire a manager to fit the type of players we have, we are in very real trouble indeed.7-8 of our so called "senior" players need to be read the riot act, and then they either a) start putting in the effort and attitude required, b) fail that, sold, or c) fail that, paid off and told to never show their face ever again near VP/BH. And then, please, stop singing players at or near the end of their lives to multi year contracts. Isn't it the manager's job to read the riot act and to drop players who don't put the effort in? Garde can't do anything about the off field shambles he walked into, but I'd expect any manager to play the alpha male and start banging heads together. I can't see any evidence that he's done that which is why I want him to go. Seems to me that he's lost the dressing room, assuming he ever found it. Yet the 5 players mentioned just above (Guzan, Bacuna, Richards, Lescott and Agbonlahor) have all been dropped and/or "read the Riot Act" to at some stage by Garde. Unfortunately he doesn't have any alternative players to pick instead, which is why it would have been nice if the promises re player investment in January had been kept.