Quote from: Toronto Villa on March 14, 2016, 07:28:35 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 14, 2016, 07:26:49 PMQuote from: SheffieldVillain on March 14, 2016, 07:20:59 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 14, 2016, 07:10:25 PMhah! Since when has Hollis had any control on what we spend? Since he was appointed as Chairman?He's employed by Lerner and follows Lerner's wishes. Do you really think if garde asks to keep the likes of Ayew when we get relegated and another 20m on top for new players, Hollis would be in a position to okay it whatever he thinks personally?Read the article. He's going to sanction spending as any chairman would. Joe Lewis owns Tottenham. Daniel Levy makes decisions in the same way Hollis will have the power to do.Within his remit. He can't just spend money that Lerner hasn't budgeted for.
Quote from: sickbeggar on March 14, 2016, 07:26:49 PMQuote from: SheffieldVillain on March 14, 2016, 07:20:59 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 14, 2016, 07:10:25 PMhah! Since when has Hollis had any control on what we spend? Since he was appointed as Chairman?He's employed by Lerner and follows Lerner's wishes. Do you really think if garde asks to keep the likes of Ayew when we get relegated and another 20m on top for new players, Hollis would be in a position to okay it whatever he thinks personally?Read the article. He's going to sanction spending as any chairman would. Joe Lewis owns Tottenham. Daniel Levy makes decisions in the same way Hollis will have the power to do.
Quote from: SheffieldVillain on March 14, 2016, 07:20:59 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 14, 2016, 07:10:25 PMhah! Since when has Hollis had any control on what we spend? Since he was appointed as Chairman?He's employed by Lerner and follows Lerner's wishes. Do you really think if garde asks to keep the likes of Ayew when we get relegated and another 20m on top for new players, Hollis would be in a position to okay it whatever he thinks personally?
Quote from: sickbeggar on March 14, 2016, 07:10:25 PMhah! Since when has Hollis had any control on what we spend? Since he was appointed as Chairman?
hah! Since when has Hollis had any control on what we spend?
Quote from: sickbeggar on March 14, 2016, 07:30:24 PMQuote from: Toronto Villa on March 14, 2016, 07:28:35 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 14, 2016, 07:26:49 PMQuote from: SheffieldVillain on March 14, 2016, 07:20:59 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 14, 2016, 07:10:25 PMhah! Since when has Hollis had any control on what we spend? Since he was appointed as Chairman?He's employed by Lerner and follows Lerner's wishes. Do you really think if garde asks to keep the likes of Ayew when we get relegated and another 20m on top for new players, Hollis would be in a position to okay it whatever he thinks personally?Read the article. He's going to sanction spending as any chairman would. Joe Lewis owns Tottenham. Daniel Levy makes decisions in the same way Hollis will have the power to do.Within his remit. He can't just spend money that Lerner hasn't budgeted for.Randy isn't doing the budgeting. That's the point. The board is.
Quote from: sickbeggar on March 14, 2016, 07:30:24 PMQuote from: Toronto Villa on March 14, 2016, 07:28:35 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 14, 2016, 07:26:49 PMQuote from: SheffieldVillain on March 14, 2016, 07:20:59 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 14, 2016, 07:10:25 PMhah! Since when has Hollis had any control on what we spend? Since he was appointed as Chairman?He's employed by Lerner and follows Lerner's wishes. Do you really think if garde asks to keep the likes of Ayew when we get relegated and another 20m on top for new players, Hollis would be in a position to okay it whatever he thinks personally?Read the article. He's going to sanction spending as any chairman would. Joe Lewis owns Tottenham. Daniel Levy makes decisions in the same way Hollis will have the power to do.Within his remit. He can't just spend money that Lerner hasn't budgeted for.So he doesn't have "no control over the money we spend", does he? Now you're saying he has control over the money we spend within his remit. Which is it?
I think we can probably agree that Hollis will cut costs where appropriate and will run the club in the same way Ellis used to, like a business. If there is money spare then we spend it on players. Randy won't bankroll like he used to. Hollis will be responsible for the daily running but will be expected NOT to lose money.
Quote from: Newby on March 14, 2016, 07:41:51 PMI think we can probably agree that Hollis will cut costs where appropriate and will run the club in the same way Ellis used to, like a business. If there is money spare then we spend it on players. Randy won't bankroll like he used to. Hollis will be responsible for the daily running but will be expected NOT to lose money.Precisely. Garde can turn up with any wishlist he likes but if it involves the club spending more than it gets it from transfers he might as well have Messi on the list
If, to use your example Remi Garde wants to keep Ayew plus £20 million to spend on top and it is a condition of Remi Garde staying Mervyn King would phone Randy Lerner and talk about it. Randy is a banker, Mervyn King was one of the most powerful bankers in the world. It would be like your parish priest getting a call from the Pope. Likewise we shall never get knocked back by a veto in an FA committee as unfairly as we were in January.
You have to ask what sort of budget whoever is controlling it will have. I'm no accountant but Randy's cut up his credit card, we've just reported a 20m loss and we're about to drop out of the richest league in the world with only a parachute payment to live on. How much are we likely to be spending?
Quote from: brian green on March 14, 2016, 07:44:10 PMIf, to use your example Remi Garde wants to keep Ayew plus £20 million to spend on top and it is a condition of Remi Garde staying Mervyn King would phone Randy Lerner and talk about it. Randy is a banker, Mervyn King was one of the most powerful bankers in the world. It would be like your parish priest getting a call from the Pope. Likewise we shall never get knocked back by a veto in an FA committee as unfairly as we were in January. I just love this idea of Mervyn King doing an aboutface from his years as a prudent banker and urging Lerner to splash the cash at every opportunity
Quote from: sickbeggar on March 14, 2016, 07:48:46 PMQuote from: brian green on March 14, 2016, 07:44:10 PMIf, to use your example Remi Garde wants to keep Ayew plus £20 million to spend on top and it is a condition of Remi Garde staying Mervyn King would phone Randy Lerner and talk about it. Randy is a banker, Mervyn King was one of the most powerful bankers in the world. It would be like your parish priest getting a call from the Pope. Likewise we shall never get knocked back by a veto in an FA committee as unfairly as we were in January. I just love this idea of Mervyn King doing an aboutface from his years as a prudent banker and urging Lerner to splash the cash at every opportunityOnly that's not at all what Brian said, is it?
Quote from: SheffieldVillain on March 14, 2016, 07:50:58 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 14, 2016, 07:48:46 PMQuote from: brian green on March 14, 2016, 07:44:10 PMIf, to use your example Remi Garde wants to keep Ayew plus £20 million to spend on top and it is a condition of Remi Garde staying Mervyn King would phone Randy Lerner and talk about it. Randy is a banker, Mervyn King was one of the most powerful bankers in the world. It would be like your parish priest getting a call from the Pope. Likewise we shall never get knocked back by a veto in an FA committee as unfairly as we were in January. I just love this idea of Mervyn King doing an aboutface from his years as a prudent banker and urging Lerner to splash the cash at every opportunityOnly that's not at all what Brian said, is it?okay so he's phoning lerner to tell him NOT to throw another 20m at a business facing a financial black hole? makes sense now.
Quote from: sickbeggar on March 14, 2016, 07:48:46 PMQuote from: brian green on March 14, 2016, 07:44:10 PMIf, to use your example Remi Garde wants to keep Ayew plus £20 million to spend on top and it is a condition of Remi Garde staying Mervyn King would phone Randy Lerner and talk about it. Randy is a banker, Mervyn King was one of the most powerful bankers in the world. It would be like your parish priest getting a call from the Pope. Likewise we shall never get knocked back by a veto in an FA committee as unfairly as we were in January. I just love this idea of Mervyn King doing an aboutface from his years as a prudent banker and urging Lerner to splash the cash at every opportunityHe is villa and if I was in his position