Quote from: ez on March 14, 2016, 05:22:28 PMQuote from: supertom on March 14, 2016, 04:36:46 PMHe can't keep coming out, week after week openly asking for his players to offer him more. At some point Garde must be held accountable for the fact that his players aren't performing for him and they're not even close to giving their all for him. He's not getting 100% from them. Even if we had a manager doing that, this lot would still struggle to stay up. Unfortunately we need one of those managers, as O Neill was, who can get a group of players playing above themselves. If they are not able to perform that's not his fault.Only if you accept that a manager cannot have any impact on a player's performance. I don't have any strong feelings either for or against him remaining our manager next season, but if we were to accept that Garde is blameless for the players being hopeless and that there is nothing that he is able to do to improve them, then what was the point in getting rid of the last guy?
Quote from: supertom on March 14, 2016, 04:36:46 PMHe can't keep coming out, week after week openly asking for his players to offer him more. At some point Garde must be held accountable for the fact that his players aren't performing for him and they're not even close to giving their all for him. He's not getting 100% from them. Even if we had a manager doing that, this lot would still struggle to stay up. Unfortunately we need one of those managers, as O Neill was, who can get a group of players playing above themselves. If they are not able to perform that's not his fault.
He can't keep coming out, week after week openly asking for his players to offer him more. At some point Garde must be held accountable for the fact that his players aren't performing for him and they're not even close to giving their all for him. He's not getting 100% from them. Even if we had a manager doing that, this lot would still struggle to stay up. Unfortunately we need one of those managers, as O Neill was, who can get a group of players playing above themselves.
Quote from: Newby on March 14, 2016, 03:40:29 PMDo we need a change to build some momentum and to give hope going in to the Championship? We definitely need a change but I think we're beyond building momentum now. I can't see us, regardless of Remi going now or in May (the latter is pretty much a given) picking up many points. Remi will leave, I'd personally let him go now and let a caretaker see us through the last 8 games. We need to be resigned to the inevitable now and the last 8 games should be played without pressure and perhaps the shackles off. Maybe Sid and Brian in unison for the last 8 games.
Do we need a change to build some momentum and to give hope going in to the Championship?
hah! Since when has Hollis had any control on what we spend?
Quote from: sickbeggar on March 14, 2016, 07:10:25 PMhah! Since when has Hollis had any control on what we spend? Since he was appointed as Chairman?
Quote from: supertom on March 14, 2016, 04:39:26 PMQuote from: Newby on March 14, 2016, 03:40:29 PMDo we need a change to build some momentum and to give hope going in to the Championship? We definitely need a change but I think we're beyond building momentum now. I can't see us, regardless of Remi going now or in May (the latter is pretty much a given) picking up many points. Remi will leave, I'd personally let him go now and let a caretaker see us through the last 8 games. We need to be resigned to the inevitable now and the last 8 games should be played without pressure and perhaps the shackles off. Maybe Sid and Brian in unison for the last 8 games.The last person I'd change right now is the manager. The people above and around him need removing and then let's see how good he is. We need to see him operating in tandem with a propoerly-qualified board, with a coherent club and playing strategy, a bunch of motivated players, a decent coaching staff and a player-acquisition policy and youth-development approach that enables a distinctive playing style to be developed over a period of years.In short, a rootand-branches overhaul.Amateur night has to end.
Quote from: SheffieldVillain on March 14, 2016, 07:20:59 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 14, 2016, 07:10:25 PMhah! Since when has Hollis had any control on what we spend? Since he was appointed as Chairman?He's employed by Lerner and follows Lerner's wishes. Do you really think if garde asks to keep the likes of Ayew when we get relegated and another 20m on top for new players, Hollis would be in a position to okay it whatever he thinks personally?
Quote from: sickbeggar on March 14, 2016, 07:26:49 PMQuote from: SheffieldVillain on March 14, 2016, 07:20:59 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 14, 2016, 07:10:25 PMhah! Since when has Hollis had any control on what we spend? Since he was appointed as Chairman?He's employed by Lerner and follows Lerner's wishes. Do you really think if garde asks to keep the likes of Ayew when we get relegated and another 20m on top for new players, Hollis would be in a position to okay it whatever he thinks personally?Read the article. He's going to sanction spending as any chairman would. Joe Lewis owns Tottenham. Daniel Levy makes decisions in the same way Hollis will have the power to do.
Quote from: Toronto Villa on March 14, 2016, 07:28:35 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 14, 2016, 07:26:49 PMQuote from: SheffieldVillain on March 14, 2016, 07:20:59 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 14, 2016, 07:10:25 PMhah! Since when has Hollis had any control on what we spend? Since he was appointed as Chairman?He's employed by Lerner and follows Lerner's wishes. Do you really think if garde asks to keep the likes of Ayew when we get relegated and another 20m on top for new players, Hollis would be in a position to okay it whatever he thinks personally?Read the article. He's going to sanction spending as any chairman would. Joe Lewis owns Tottenham. Daniel Levy makes decisions in the same way Hollis will have the power to do.Within his remit. He can't just spend money that Lerner hasn't budgeted for.