Quote from: chrisw1 on November 03, 2015, 10:46:28 PMWhat a load of tripe. More speculation there than the worst red topsEdit re the post Leicester dressing room postThanks for your considered and constructive input.There was a reason why it was prefaced with (purely uneducated) guess.If you'd like to offer a counter explanation as to a possible course of events where we went from doing sort of OK to a split dressing room, which Richards has as good as admitted is the case, with Leicester as the obvious fulcrum point, then feel free.
What a load of tripe. More speculation there than the worst red topsEdit re the post Leicester dressing room post
Quote from: Villa in Denmark on November 03, 2015, 10:59:36 PMQuote from: chrisw1 on November 03, 2015, 10:46:28 PMWhat a load of tripe. More speculation there than the worst red topsEdit re the post Leicester dressing room postThanks for your considered and constructive input.There was a reason why it was prefaced with (purely uneducated) guess.If you'd like to offer a counter explanation as to a possible course of events where we went from doing sort of OK to a split dressing room, which Richards has as good as admitted is the case, with Leicester as the obvious fulcrum point, then feel free.Why would I? You've just completely made up a bullshit hypothetical scenario. What's the point of that?
Quote from: chrisw1 on November 04, 2015, 08:45:51 AMQuote from: Villa in Denmark on November 03, 2015, 10:59:36 PMQuote from: chrisw1 on November 03, 2015, 10:46:28 PMWhat a load of tripe. More speculation there than the worst red topsEdit re the post Leicester dressing room postThanks for your considered and constructive input.There was a reason why it was prefaced with (purely uneducated) guess.If you'd like to offer a counter explanation as to a possible course of events where we went from doing sort of OK to a split dressing room, which Richards has as good as admitted is the case, with Leicester as the obvious fulcrum point, then feel free.Why would I? You've just completely made up a bullshit hypothetical scenario. What's the point of that?A bit of fun debate pontificating about what's gone on,(because something definitely has.)Why you then need to get you knickers in a twist about something that was clearly marked as nothing other than that is a bit of a mystery.Still look on the bright side. At least it might have distracted people from creaming their pants over the appointment of our new manager.
Can't believe how carried away people are getting about this appointment and one interview where he speaks reasonable English and makes some pretty straightforward sensible comments.I desperately want him to be a success and hopefully he will be. But really his CV offers little more than Garry Monks or Brendan Rogers (and in an inferior league) who people didn't want to touch with a barge-pole. Let's hope he's the new Wenger, Klopp of Pep, but it's probably a bit premature to be creaming your crackers about this appointment right now.
I desperately want him to be a success and hopefully he will be. But really his CV offers little more than Garry Monks or Brendan Rogers
Quote from: chrisw1 on November 04, 2015, 08:41:23 AMI desperately want him to be a success and hopefully he will be. But really his CV offers little more than Garry Monks or Brendan RogersHow do you work that out then?
Quote from: Villa in Denmark on November 04, 2015, 08:51:02 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on November 04, 2015, 08:45:51 AMQuote from: Villa in Denmark on November 03, 2015, 10:59:36 PMQuote from: chrisw1 on November 03, 2015, 10:46:28 PMWhat a load of tripe. More speculation there than the worst red topsEdit re the post Leicester dressing room postThanks for your considered and constructive input.There was a reason why it was prefaced with (purely uneducated) guess.If you'd like to offer a counter explanation as to a possible course of events where we went from doing sort of OK to a split dressing room, which Richards has as good as admitted is the case, with Leicester as the obvious fulcrum point, then feel free.Why would I? You've just completely made up a bullshit hypothetical scenario. What's the point of that?A bit of fun debate pontificating about what's gone on,(because something definitely has.)Why you then need to get you knickers in a twist about something that was clearly marked as nothing other than that is a bit of a mystery.Still look on the bright side. At least it might have distracted people from creaming their pants over the appointment of our new manager.OK. I just think Sherwood has taken enough stick based on factual matters that are there for all to see. Completely making stuff up to give him a further beating just seems a bit unnecessary to me.
Quote from: chrisw1 on November 04, 2015, 08:54:16 AMQuote from: Villa in Denmark on November 04, 2015, 08:51:02 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on November 04, 2015, 08:45:51 AMQuote from: Villa in Denmark on November 03, 2015, 10:59:36 PMQuote from: chrisw1 on November 03, 2015, 10:46:28 PMWhat a load of tripe. More speculation there than the worst red topsEdit re the post Leicester dressing room postThanks for your considered and constructive input.There was a reason why it was prefaced with (purely uneducated) guess.If you'd like to offer a counter explanation as to a possible course of events where we went from doing sort of OK to a split dressing room, which Richards has as good as admitted is the case, with Leicester as the obvious fulcrum point, then feel free.Why would I? You've just completely made up a bullshit hypothetical scenario. What's the point of that?A bit of fun debate pontificating about what's gone on,(because something definitely has.)Why you then need to get you knickers in a twist about something that was clearly marked as nothing other than that is a bit of a mystery.Still look on the bright side. At least it might have distracted people from creaming their pants over the appointment of our new manager.OK. I just think Sherwood has taken enough stick based on factual matters that are there for all to see. Completely making stuff up to give him a further beating just seems a bit unnecessary to me. Given his levels of non-performance and disrespectful way he treated the club over his last 3-4 weeks with his interviews and press conferences, we could never stop beating him enough from my point of view.My only hope for a possible return to Villa Park for him is that it's with a team he's had for more than 3-4 months.With regards making stuff up, it was a hypothesis, something to be argued / debated, not taken as an assertion of fact.Or should we really just believe that nothing happened in the dressing room to move from a team doing sort of OK but not great and looking like the new recruits were starting to get game time, to them all being ostracised as performances and results fell through the floor?Of all the ifs, buts and maybes from Sherwood's brief reign, that's what I'd like to know more about.
Sorry Rob but I think the days of deep pockets in football is going to become a thing of the past. There will always be large sums change hands but there will be irresistible moves for even the biggest clubs to become self financing as opposed to being the vanities of trillionaires.
Quote from: Dave on November 04, 2015, 08:56:20 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on November 04, 2015, 08:41:23 AMI desperately want him to be a success and hopefully he will be. But really his CV offers little more than Garry Monks or Brendan RogersHow do you work that out then?he's had three years of moderate success in a French League.Rogers and Monk have had periods of moderate success in the Premier League.
Alan Brazil says can only see two losses