There are so many players Garde could improve just by suggesting one addition to their game. In Adama's case, it would be 'pass'. Grealish, it would be 'shoot'. Agbonlahor, 'leave'.
Quote from: curiousorange on November 03, 2015, 07:52:57 AMThere are so many players Garde could improve just by suggesting one addition to their game. In Adama's case, it would be 'pass'. Grealish, it would be 'shoot'. Agbonlahor, 'leave'.Garde should have the information he needs about Agbonlahor.It will have been supplied by Gerard Houlier.
Has anybody else spotted this rumour about a clause in Traore's contract where he goes from 45k a week to 75k based on appearances, and that's why he's not playing? Cascarino seems to know all about it based on the piece I saw it in.Apologies if this has appeared elsewhere; just thought I'd see if that's old gossip.
Quote from: Proposition Joe on October 28, 2015, 08:07:12 PMIf the reported 40K is basic wage, and the "incentives" to bring it up to 75K include a hefty appearance fee, maybe that's why they're leaving him out of a midweek cup game.Or, he really is not what we though he was. Pele hasn't sung Adama's praises anywhere has he? Then we'd know for sure he's crap.First why is this even a talking point? There are many players around the league on this kind of money and more. Second he signed a 5 year contract. Why would we be leaving him out of the side after a couple of months due to a payment clause?
If the reported 40K is basic wage, and the "incentives" to bring it up to 75K include a hefty appearance fee, maybe that's why they're leaving him out of a midweek cup game.Or, he really is not what we though he was. Pele hasn't sung Adama's praises anywhere has he? Then we'd know for sure he's crap.
Ask yourself - how likely is it that we'd agree to a contract that would mean within two months we'd be paying him not to play?
Probably bullshit but it's hard not to think of the Ilori deal whereby his price for a permanent move relates to the number of appearances he makes this season.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on November 05, 2015, 07:56:33 PMAsk yourself - how likely is it that we'd agree to a contract that would mean within two months we'd be paying him not to play?Precisely it's utter bollocks.