Quote from: Risso on May 03, 2015, 09:59:47 AMIt's weird that Lambert arrived with a reputation as being tactically astute and able to adapt game by game, whereas Sherwood was unfairly maligned as "Tactics Tim". Rarely can two reputations have been so poorly deserved.It also shows how important the personality of the manager is when it comes to actually implementing tactics. Lambert could have been Guardiola on the touchlines, but he's not going to inspire anyone to run through walls for him. You can tell Sherwood really has all the players completely buying in to what he wants them to do.
It's weird that Lambert arrived with a reputation as being tactically astute and able to adapt game by game, whereas Sherwood was unfairly maligned as "Tactics Tim". Rarely can two reputations have been so poorly deserved.
Quote from: Villa in Denmark on May 02, 2015, 08:44:38 PMQuote from: Monty on May 02, 2015, 07:59:49 PMAgreed. It shows that Sherwood is a lot better than many of us feared, and also that Lambert was somehow worse than many of us thought.As much as the results, it's the performance levels that are amazing, and especially how he's taken on some of the "big boys". Maybe the months out gave him some time to reflect on the hammerings he got on occasions.When we gifted that first goal last week, I'm pretty sure we'd have got hammered under Lambert, mainly due to lack of belief, but Sherwood's Spurs side last season would have also been in danger of a 4 or 5 goal drubbing due to a very open all or nothing style.What we've seen the last fee weeks is a balanced approach that makes use of the player's strengths, but also has hard work and defensive discipline at it's core.He does seem to have learned an awful lot. His Spurs team were so predictable and awkward, Eriksen always out of position and those bizarre experiments attempting to play Kyle Walker in every position except right back. Now, he looks like Jurgen bloody Klopp - the plans are very clear, there's a bit of variation and mixing it up but without muddling up the general style, all the players are in the best roles for them.And - and this needs to be said - he does seem to be a little bit mental, which makes him so much more of a wildcard than XYZ British plodder you might care to mention. I hope he keeps it up - it still seems unsustainable somehow, somehow too good to be true, but I hope he keeps it up - and it should be enough to keep us up. And then there's the final...
Quote from: Monty on May 02, 2015, 07:59:49 PMAgreed. It shows that Sherwood is a lot better than many of us feared, and also that Lambert was somehow worse than many of us thought.As much as the results, it's the performance levels that are amazing, and especially how he's taken on some of the "big boys". Maybe the months out gave him some time to reflect on the hammerings he got on occasions.When we gifted that first goal last week, I'm pretty sure we'd have got hammered under Lambert, mainly due to lack of belief, but Sherwood's Spurs side last season would have also been in danger of a 4 or 5 goal drubbing due to a very open all or nothing style.What we've seen the last fee weeks is a balanced approach that makes use of the player's strengths, but also has hard work and defensive discipline at it's core.
Agreed. It shows that Sherwood is a lot better than many of us feared, and also that Lambert was somehow worse than many of us thought.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on May 02, 2015, 07:42:57 PMIt's an amazing turnaround, but it also makes you wonder what the fuck Lambert was doing.He wasn't just failing to get the best out of this squad, he wasn't even getting a middling return for the resources he had.It just shows what an idiot Lambert was. The most idiotic of all his daft 'ideas' was his 'new style' of having us knock the ball around our own half in the misguided belief that it would make our possession stats look more impressive, despite the fact that we couldn't get anywhere near the goal. As if we - and everybody else in football - wouldn't notice that. And it bears repeating, as if his 'ideas' weren't fuzzy enough, the way he spoke did neither him nor us any favours at all. It wasn't just his accent, but the stream of garbled rubbish he came out with. When I speak to people of other nationalities in my work, I tone down my Birmingham accent and I don't use colloquialisms and quirks of speech that I know they won't understand. Lambert didn't modify the way he spoke at all, which was discourteous and very, very stupid. I think I dislike him a lot more than TSM1, who at least knew his limitations.Sherwood is such a breath of fresh air: confident, comprehensible, astute, charismatic; the complete antithesis of his dimwitted predecessor.
It's an amazing turnaround, but it also makes you wonder what the fuck Lambert was doing.He wasn't just failing to get the best out of this squad, he wasn't even getting a middling return for the resources he had.
I don't subscribe to the criticism of Lambert for all of Villas failings.He was handed a poisoned challace in terms of budget,then his coaching staff let him down and finally the appointment of Keane was an accident waiting to happen. He was clearly ground down by events which any objective outsider could see. Despite all of this the disconnected management at the club only acted when we were tettering on the brink.Lambert brought decent players to the club and we as supporters should have the class to acknowledge that.We have an excellent manager now but given the quality of the club ownership/management I suspect that is more by accident than design.
Quote from: passport1 on May 03, 2015, 10:43:50 AMI don't subscribe to the criticism of Lambert for all of Villas failings.He was handed a poisoned challace in terms of budget,then his coaching staff let him down and finally the appointment of Keane was an accident waiting to happen. He was clearly ground down by events which any objective outsider could see. Despite all of this the disconnected management at the club only acted when we were tettering on the brink.Lambert brought decent players to the club and we as supporters should have the class to acknowledge that.We have an excellent manager now but given the quality of the club ownership/management I suspect that is more by accident than design.Lambert was useless at coaching. Could spot a player, fair enough, but once he'd signed them, he couldn't organise them. Equally, Lambert chose the coaching staff too. I agree about the budget but Sherwood has those same players playing like they know what they are doing now.
The chalice was poisoned by Lambert, this is the same chalice that Sherwood has turned round into a very sweet tasting wine goblet, so please not the poor man Lambert, he nearly killed this club and if he was still here we would be all moaning on the way to the Championship.