Quote from: bob on February 14, 2015, 02:57:51 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on February 14, 2015, 02:39:00 PMCongratulations, you fucking idiots, you've added another embarrassing entry to your list of shit appointments.We really have given up.Bit over the topNope, absolutely accurate.Out of the frying pan, into a fucking cremation oven.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on February 14, 2015, 02:39:00 PMCongratulations, you fucking idiots, you've added another embarrassing entry to your list of shit appointments.We really have given up.Bit over the top
Congratulations, you fucking idiots, you've added another embarrassing entry to your list of shit appointments.We really have given up.
Quote from: Smirker on February 14, 2015, 03:46:20 PMHas the club not learned anything from that stupid four year Lambert contract? Why not give him the rest of the season and then think about a long term deal? Fucking idiots.I agree, but his representatives would not have gone for that. I would think a 3 year contract is about the minimum anyone would take.
Has the club not learned anything from that stupid four year Lambert contract? Why not give him the rest of the season and then think about a long term deal? Fucking idiots.
Quote from: Smirker on February 14, 2015, 03:46:20 PMHas the club not learned anything from that stupid four year Lambert contract? Why not give him the rest of the season and then think about a long term deal? Fucking idiots. Not sure it works well if the players know it could be only 14 games in charge. They need to believe he is there for the long haul even if he isn't if you know what I mean
Quote from: Dave on February 14, 2015, 03:34:31 PMQuote from: bob on February 14, 2015, 02:57:51 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on February 14, 2015, 02:39:00 PMCongratulations, you fucking idiots, you've added another embarrassing entry to your list of shit appointments.We really have given up.Bit over the topNope, absolutely accurate.Out of the frying pan, into a fucking cremation oven.Ridiculous comment, there is no way you can be certain of that.
Quote from: Dave on February 14, 2015, 03:34:31 PMQuote from: bob on February 14, 2015, 02:57:51 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on February 14, 2015, 02:39:00 PMCongratulations, you fucking idiots, you've added another embarrassing entry to your list of shit appointments.We really have given up.Bit over the topNope, absolutely accurate.Out of the frying pan, into a fucking cremation oven.So this appointment is embarrassing and that is absolutely accurate?
For novice see Gary Monk, for winner, see attitude and PL title winners medal, for development capabilities see Harry Kane and others at spuds. For arrogance see good confidence levels. He ticks a lot of boxes for me. And more importantly I can understand what he says. I say give him a chance.
Quote from: avfcpg on February 14, 2015, 03:52:00 PMQuote from: The Sound of Villadelphia on February 14, 2015, 03:45:35 PMQuote from: avfcpg on February 14, 2015, 03:32:04 PMVery much an unknown quantity. He only managed for 28 games at Spurs, but won at least 50% of them. But he's young, hungry and ambitious. He's 46 which by PL standards is not young. 28 games at Spurs was all he was allowed. I wonder how many he'll get at Villa?Under Levy...well known for his patience...wonder if we'd sack him if he won half our remaining games...?But he had Spurs' players. If he were to repeat what he did at Spurs with us, that would mean matching his predecessor's win percentage.
Quote from: The Sound of Villadelphia on February 14, 2015, 03:45:35 PMQuote from: avfcpg on February 14, 2015, 03:32:04 PMVery much an unknown quantity. He only managed for 28 games at Spurs, but won at least 50% of them. But he's young, hungry and ambitious. He's 46 which by PL standards is not young. 28 games at Spurs was all he was allowed. I wonder how many he'll get at Villa?Under Levy...well known for his patience...wonder if we'd sack him if he won half our remaining games...?
Quote from: avfcpg on February 14, 2015, 03:32:04 PMVery much an unknown quantity. He only managed for 28 games at Spurs, but won at least 50% of them. But he's young, hungry and ambitious. He's 46 which by PL standards is not young. 28 games at Spurs was all he was allowed. I wonder how many he'll get at Villa?
Very much an unknown quantity. He only managed for 28 games at Spurs, but won at least 50% of them. But he's young, hungry and ambitious.
Sherwood's managerial record:LC West Ham (h) L1-2PL Southampton (a) W3-2PL West Brom (h) D1-1PL Stoke (h) W3-0PL Man United (a) W2-1FA Arsenal (a) L0-2PL Crystal Palace (h) W2-0PL Swansea (a) W3-1PL Man City (h) L1-5PL Hull City (a) D1-1PL Everton (h) W1-0PL Newcastle (a) W4-0EU Dnipro (a) L0-1PL Norwich (a) L0-1EU Dnipro (h) W3-0PL Cardiff (h) W1-0PL Chelsea (a) L0-4EU Benfica (h) L1-3PL Arsenal (a) L0-1EU Benfica (h) D2-2PL Southampton (h) W3-2PL Liverpool (a) L0-4PL Sunderland (h) W5-1PL West Brom (a) D3-3PL Fulham (h) W3-1PL Stoke (a) W1-0PL West Ham (a) L0-2PL Aston Villa (h) W3-0Good news: Not many draws, and lots of goals. Good record v Stoke, and beaten Man U at Old Trafford.Bad news: Some heavy beatings in there from Chelsea, Liverpool and Man City. Inconsistent results - doesn't seem to have established a decent run anywhere in there.
Quote from: Monty on February 14, 2015, 03:55:05 PMQuote from: avfcpg on February 14, 2015, 03:52:00 PMQuote from: The Sound of Villadelphia on February 14, 2015, 03:45:35 PMQuote from: avfcpg on February 14, 2015, 03:32:04 PMVery much an unknown quantity. He only managed for 28 games at Spurs, but won at least 50% of them. But he's young, hungry and ambitious. He's 46 which by PL standards is not young. 28 games at Spurs was all he was allowed. I wonder how many he'll get at Villa?Under Levy...well known for his patience...wonder if we'd sack him if he won half our remaining games...?But he had Spurs' players. If he were to repeat what he did at Spurs with us, that would mean matching his predecessor's win percentage.The major criticism of Lambert was that he didn't get the most out of the players at his disposal, if Sherwood can galvanise them quickly and get them performing near the level they should be capable of then he will do the job required. Clearly, we then have a different job in the summer but lets cross that bridge when we get to it.
Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.
Author
Topic: It's not Sherwood! (Read 728825 times)
