However bad he is for us, I bet he still proves better value than £16m on Brown Ideye and Victor Anichebe.
Quote from: Dave on January 31, 2015, 10:33:13 PMHowever bad he is for us, I bet he still proves better value than £16m on Brown Ideye and Victor Anichebe.Davies, Reo-Coker, Habib Beye, Harewood, Shorey, Warnock etc Both Anichebe & Ideye were apparently heavily incentive based. Anichebe was apparently £4million upfront with the remainder being add-ons.Brown Ideye was also around £2.5m/£3.5m with his incentives being goals based - Richard Garlick confirmed this at supporters club meetings.
Quote from: Dave on January 31, 2015, 10:33:13 PMHowever bad he is for us, I bet he still proves better value than £16m on Brown Ideye and Victor Anichebe.Brown Ideye was also around £2.5m/£3.5m with his incentives being goals based - Richard Garlick confirmed this at supporters club meetings.
Brown Ideye was also around £2.5m/£3.5m with his incentives being goals based - Richard Garlick confirmed this at supporters club meetings.
Small Heath used to pull that trick. When they wanted to sound ambitious they'd quote the price with add-ons which would include an extra £10m instalment payable if and when humanity is wiped out by an asteroid. Then if the said player was a flop they'd announce he was only on loan anyway.
Quote from: saunders_heroes on January 31, 2015, 11:02:03 PMSmall Heath used to pull that trick. When they wanted to sound ambitious they'd quote the price with add-ons which would include an extra £10m instalment payable if and when humanity is wiped out by an asteroid. Then if the said player was a flop they'd announce he was only on loan anyway. Like when Doug used to announce the cost of signings and it'd be the transfer fee, the total wages over x years, the national insurance, the VAT, the lot.
Your official website seems to claim that you signed him for a club record fee. One that surpassed the fee that you paid for Sessegnon, who was your previous record signing.If you've only paid £2.5m for him, why is your official website lying about it?
Quote from: Dave on January 31, 2015, 11:08:15 PMYour official website seems to claim that you signed him for a club record fee. One that surpassed the fee that you paid for Sessegnon, who was your previous record signing.If you've only paid £2.5m for him, why is your official website lying about it?We have a new brand swanking PR system who were probably under orders to spin it as nicely as they could.Worth remembering the context of the situation - we had just appointed a hopeless head coach. Many fans were disgruntled that Pepe Mel had left and been replaced by somebody who had struggled in League One. Then we had the fiasco with the pin-stripe kit and the furore that created with idiots messing around with our history and tradition. Jeremy Peace and others were coming in for criticism. The club needed to create a positive headline to at least engage supporters and by suggesting we had spent £10million and broken our transfer record portrayed they were showing some ambition - something they are often questioned about.Given how thorough they are with their scouting and how reluctant we are to spend fees then I fail to believe we spent £10million on someone like Brown Ideye.
Quote from: Liam_Baggies on January 31, 2015, 10:48:08 PMBrown Ideye was also around £2.5m/£3.5m with his incentives being goals based - Richard Garlick confirmed this at supporters club meetings.Odd.Your official website seems to claim that you signed him for a club record fee. One that surpassed the fee that you paid for Sessegnon, who was your previous record signing.If you've only paid £2.5m for him, why is your official website lying about it?