Hales lucky there. Another one day slash at the ball.
Quote from: Villafirst on July 24, 2016, 05:56:21 PMHales lucky there. Another one day slash at the ball. Well yeah, but can't you see why he'd do that in this match situation? I imagine they want to score quickly. He'd be playing pretty selfishly if he was leaving lots.
Quote from: PaulWinch again on July 24, 2016, 06:28:27 PMQuote from: Villafirst on July 24, 2016, 05:56:21 PMHales lucky there. Another one day slash at the ball. Well yeah, but can't you see why he'd do that in this match situation? I imagine they want to score quickly. He'd be playing pretty selfishly if he was leaving lots. Yes, but he did that at the start of the second innings of the last test and arguably contributed to the defeat.
Vince isn't good enough - as I said, another Adam Lyth. Bell at 4 or 5 would be my choice.
Of course we will win. But I do not understand for the life of me why we didn't make them follow on. The bowlers hadn't done much work and the opposition just want the game to finish.
The only thing I can think of re: not following on, was to take the opportunity to rub their bowlers' noses in it. Which we pretty much did, so hopefully a psychological boost for the next two tests.