And why does only Chris Woakes seem to have an emergency pack of Benson & Hedgehog strapped between his shoulder blades?
Given not only his form but now that England have seen what Bears fans have seen for years, that Woakes can bot as well as bowl, it is probably worth replacing Stokes with Rashid. Obviously Ball and Wood would come into the reckoning and I think there will be a temptation to get Wood back in to give him more international miles on the clock. Shift Ali and Woakes up a slot and slot Rashid in. Edgbaston should suit two spinners and given the size of the thrashing we should be able to go in with 3 seamers and do the job. The batting is still a worry and we seem to have 3 batsman failing too regularly in the top/middle order. But with Root hitting form, Cook looking more assured, and a good 100 runs or so seemingly guaranteed from the Bairstow/Woakes combination it allows us to go in at almost three quarter strength. Not ideal and it is only 1-1 but I'd like to see Hales, Vince, and Ballance given the series. Out of the 3 I think Vince can become a test player but he is a bit over eager to show his attacking instinct which if curbed would turn him into a very good player. I don't think hales can get away with it too often at the top of the order and I think we'll keep with him until Bell-Drummond is trusted.If the middle order of Vince/Ballance fails again though, and England don't win, the call will be to bring Bell back. Which I don't think we should. I'd go withCookHalesRootBallanceVince - think he'd do better at 5 and Ballance at 4. Ballance at 5 doesn't look right. Bairstow - thought he had a good test at Old TraffordAliWoakesRashidBroadAnderson
If the middle order of Vince/Ballance fails again though, and England don't win, the call will be to bring Bell back. Which I don't think we should.
Potentially a quite exciting finish in the Sri Lanka-Convictia test.