collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Other Games 2025-26 by Dave
[Today at 05:57:55 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Gareth
[Today at 05:57:11 PM]


Leander Dendoncker (sold to Real Oviedo) by Louzie0
[Today at 05:50:55 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by Tuscans
[Today at 05:44:02 PM]


Unai Emery by VILLA MOLE
[Today at 05:31:41 PM]


Season Ticket 2025/26 by waynejames
[Today at 04:11:56 PM]


Jacob Ramsey - Gone by ChicagoLion
[Today at 04:08:06 PM]


The Barton's Arms by waynejames
[Today at 04:06:42 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Dave
[Today at 05:57:55 PM]


Re: Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Gareth
[Today at 05:57:11 PM]


Re: Leander Dendoncker (sold to Real Oviedo) by Louzie0
[Today at 05:50:55 PM]


Re: Leander Dendoncker (sold to Real Oviedo) by London Villan
[Today at 05:47:49 PM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by Tuscans
[Today at 05:44:02 PM]


Re: Unai Emery by VILLA MOLE
[Today at 05:31:41 PM]


Re: Unai Emery by Toronto Villa
[Today at 05:26:47 PM]


Re: Unai Emery by eamonn
[Today at 05:26:27 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Cricket Thread 2016  (Read 501011 times)

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55121
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5160 on: July 24, 2016, 06:28:27 PM »
Hales lucky there. Another one day slash at the ball.

Well yeah, but can't you see why he'd do that in this match situation? I imagine they want to score quickly. He'd be playing pretty selfishly if he was leaving lots.

Offline Villafirst

  • Member
  • Posts: 7358
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5161 on: July 24, 2016, 11:03:57 PM »
Hales lucky there. Another one day slash at the ball.

Well yeah, but can't you see why he'd do that in this match situation? I imagine they want to score quickly. He'd be playing pretty selfishly if he was leaving lots.

Yes, but he did that at the start of the second innings of the last test and arguably contributed to the defeat.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55121
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5162 on: July 25, 2016, 09:25:16 AM »
Hales lucky there. Another one day slash at the ball.

Well yeah, but can't you see why he'd do that in this match situation? I imagine they want to score quickly. He'd be playing pretty selfishly if he was leaving lots.

Yes, but he did that at the start of the second innings of the last test and arguably contributed to the defeat.

Maybe so, but that's not really relevant to yesterday's dismissal as the situation is completely different. Also he contributed as much to the Lords defeat as any of the batsmen who made stupid errors.

Offline AVH87

  • Member
  • Posts: 1728
  • Location: Dudley
  • GM : 13.02.2021
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5163 on: July 25, 2016, 11:28:52 AM »
Vince isn't good enough - as I said,  another Adam Lyth. Bell at 4 or 5 would be my choice.

I’m not sure why Vince was ever picked in the first place to be honest, he hasn’t got any kind of track record in Division 1 of the County Championship. His selection seems to be based on one prolific season in Division 2 against lollipop bowlers. Bell hasn’t been as good as expected this season for Warwicks but is still averaging 40-odd so would be a better choice.

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37282
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5164 on: July 25, 2016, 11:38:32 AM »
I'm not really clear on what we're doing here.  I suspected a quick blast for half an hour this morning and then declare but they're still there so I don't really understand what he's planning here.

What they are doing well, I suppose, is taking shots as Yasir's confidence. I can't imagine that 260+ for 1 for the match won't be playing on his mind.

Offline UK Redsox

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 42873
  • Location: Forest of Dean & Fenway Park
  • GM : 10.02.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5165 on: July 25, 2016, 11:43:33 AM »
Looks like Cook just wanted to stay out there to get another 100 partnership. If so, that's a bit selfish

Offline AVH87

  • Member
  • Posts: 1728
  • Location: Dudley
  • GM : 13.02.2021
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5166 on: July 25, 2016, 01:53:47 PM »
The forecast isn't too bad for today and tomorrow, just the odd shower. We'll win, it's just a matter of when.

Offline cheltenhamlion

  • Member
  • Posts: 18734
  • Location: Pedmore, Stourbridge
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5167 on: July 25, 2016, 04:00:22 PM »
Of course we will win. But I do not understand for the life of me why we didn't make them follow on. The bowlers hadn't done much work and the opposition just want the game to finish.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55121
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5168 on: July 25, 2016, 05:07:02 PM »
Well done Mo.

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37282
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5169 on: July 25, 2016, 05:25:39 PM »
Of course we will win. But I do not understand for the life of me why we didn't make them follow on. The bowlers hadn't done much work and the opposition just want the game to finish.

I don't think it really made much diffference, I don't understand either but I don't think it was a wrong decision given there were 7 sessions (pretty much) left in the game and little chance of losing any significant time.  It's when we don't enforce it with 4 sessions left (which we did quite a bit a few years back) that it's frustrating because then you're just eating away at your own chances of winning.

Offline peter w

  • Member
  • Posts: 35469
  • Location: Istanbul
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5170 on: July 25, 2016, 05:36:18 PM »
I think it's a poor decision by Cook to bring Broad back on as it's clearly just to try and let him get a wicket. The turn to seamerf in this series - and against Sri lanka - is Chris Woakes. We should be looking to be ruthless and not giving the ball to along-standing England bowler so that we can wrap it up tonight.

Offline Whiney MacWhineface

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12320
  • Location: East Sussex
  • GM : 25.01.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5171 on: July 25, 2016, 05:38:03 PM »
The only thing I can think of re: not following on, was to take the opportunity to rub their bowlers' noses in it. Which we pretty much did, so hopefully a psychological boost for the next two tests.

Offline Whiney MacWhineface

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12320
  • Location: East Sussex
  • GM : 25.01.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5172 on: July 25, 2016, 05:43:49 PM »
And why does only Chris Woakes seem to have an emergency pack of Benson & Hedgehog strapped between his shoulder blades?

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37282
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5173 on: July 25, 2016, 05:47:26 PM »
The only thing I can think of re: not following on, was to take the opportunity to rub their bowlers' noses in it. Which we pretty much did, so hopefully a psychological boost for the next two tests.

Yeah I said that earlier but specifically about Yasir.

All over now anyway, fitting for Woakes to take the catch at least, he didn't get Motm last week because we lost, he won't get it this week because we won with the bat and Root drove that but he's comfortably the best player in this series.


EDIT


Wasn't watching and got that the wrong way round, thought it was broad bowling and woakes catching, oops.
« Last Edit: July 25, 2016, 05:49:33 PM by paul_e »

Offline peter w

  • Member
  • Posts: 35469
  • Location: Istanbul
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5174 on: July 25, 2016, 05:50:47 PM »
told you

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal