Coaching and managing are two distinct jobs and being adept at one has nothing to do with who you're working with but how you can do your job.
I have not seen anything at all in the news about it, so I would guess speculation.
Quote from: ozzjim on December 08, 2014, 09:41:50 PMI have not seen anything at all in the news about it, so I would guess speculation. Daily Mirror had it, but then again they could have just picked it up of Twatter.
If this is true I would be happy with Clarke as he has a very good track record as a number two. I just don't see any truth to it because now that he has had a taste at being a number one and was quite good at it I don't think he would want to go back to being a number two.
Quote from: ozzjim on December 08, 2014, 01:05:05 PMHe has a good reputation as a coach, and was harshly sacked by Albion when the bullet came. Would be a very interesting one, and much more of a threat to Lambert than Keane ever was I reckon.He wasn't harshly sacked at all - he had won something like 7 of his last 41 and performances were getting worse each week.Apart from the opening three months which were really enjoyable the rest of his tenure was bloody awful.He then did himself no favour when he questioned the board (which I agreed with).
He has a good reputation as a coach, and was harshly sacked by Albion when the bullet came. Would be a very interesting one, and much more of a threat to Lambert than Keane ever was I reckon.
Quote from: peter w on December 08, 2014, 11:05:37 PMCoaching and managing are two distinct jobs and being adept at one has nothing to do with who you're working with but how you can do your job.I agree entirely. I just don't think that there is enough evidence available to definitively say that he is adept at one and inept at the other.Taking West Brom to eighth and then being sacked halfway through the following season doesn't mean that he is a good manager, but I certainly don't think it's enough evidence to say that he is a bad one. Just like coaching Terry, Robben and Drogba to the title doesn't necessarily mean he's a great coach. Particularly when his other experience of the role are coaching West Ham to relegation and coaching that eighth placed Andy Carroll/Kenny Dalglish Liverpool team.I just don't see what evidence people can point at to say that he is good at one and bad at the other.
How long do we give it before someone posts on here about "how far we have fallen that we can't even compete with Reading now"?