At the risk of over-complicating things, maybe wear short sleeves if it's warm and long sleeves if it's cold?
Quote from: cdbullyweefan on June 02, 2014, 12:21:34 PMNo. Some stripes are stripier than others. Put it this way, if Newcastle brought out a shirt with those sort of stripes on, there would be uproar. Because it's not a proper stripe. Therefore it is fine for our purposes.Thick or thin it's still a stripe.
No. Some stripes are stripier than others. Put it this way, if Newcastle brought out a shirt with those sort of stripes on, there would be uproar. Because it's not a proper stripe. Therefore it is fine for our purposes.
The long or short sleeve thing.It depends what kind of player we're talking about. A creative midfielder along the lines of Sid, for example, should always wear long sleeves. That's because players like that need to have a bit of what I believe the kids call (or called a few years ago) "swagger" about them, and you can't really do that in short sleeves, they need to cover as much of their bony, talented frames as possible, which means long sleeves every time.Centre halves need to be in short sleeves, partly from a "roll your sleeves up and get stuck in" kind of thing.re wingers, the point about creative midfielders - "number 10s" as Paul Lambert calls them - also applies to wide players. Think of that Tony Morley goal at Everton in the 80-1 season. Imagine him in short sleeves for that. It just doesn't seem right, does it?Your traditional big man up front, your Peter Withe absolutely must have short sleeves (in his case for easy access to sweat bands), never long ones. That's because big strikers need to appear to be rugged and hard to handle. You can't do that in long sleeves.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on June 02, 2014, 12:37:16 PMQuote from: cdbullyweefan on June 02, 2014, 12:21:34 PMNo. Some stripes are stripier than others. Put it this way, if Newcastle brought out a shirt with those sort of stripes on, there would be uproar. Because it's not a proper stripe. Therefore it is fine for our purposes.Thick or thin it's still a stripe.This one's not too bad.
Happy they have stuck with the basic template, but the colours are still wrong for me - the claret is may be about right, or nearly right, better than previous Macron efforts but the blue on the sleeves is still all wrong. They seem to be able to get it right on the socks but not the sleeves. Roll on a change of supplier.
Why are the stripes white and not blue?
Quote from: VinnieChase84 on June 02, 2014, 01:14:40 PMWhy are the stripes white and not blue?They are blue... aren't they?Have to check now!EDIT ** Yes, definitely blue, Vinnie **
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on June 02, 2014, 12:26:09 PMThe long or short sleeve thing.It depends what kind of player we're talking about. A creative midfielder along the lines of Sid, for example, should always wear long sleeves. That's because players like that need to have a bit of what I believe the kids call (or called a few years ago) "swagger" about them, and you can't really do that in short sleeves, they need to cover as much of their bony, talented frames as possible, which means long sleeves every time.Centre halves need to be in short sleeves, partly from a "roll your sleeves up and get stuck in" kind of thing.re wingers, the point about creative midfielders - "number 10s" as Paul Lambert calls them - also applies to wide players. Think of that Tony Morley goal at Everton in the 80-1 season. Imagine him in short sleeves for that. It just doesn't seem right, does it?Your traditional big man up front, your Peter Withe absolutely must have short sleeves (in his case for easy access to sweat bands), never long ones. That's because big strikers need to appear to be rugged and hard to handle. You can't do that in long sleeves.A perfect summation. Should be included in the laws of the game.
Always bothered me that Stanley Victor And Dwight liked a sleeve. Dwight yes, Stan no. It's a look thing. Can I add no keeper should have short sleeves? Wrong on all levels.