collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Southampton (H): The post match thread  (Read 32788 times)

Offline Phil from the upper holte

  • Member
  • Posts: 10142
  • Location: B62
Re: Southampton (H): The post match thread
« Reply #120 on: April 19, 2014, 11:20:03 PM »
Positive we kept a clean sheet, negative it was boring and we didn't look like scoring. Lets just get the dreadful season out of the way I'm so bored with it

Offline curiousorange

  • Member
  • Posts: 9322
  • Location: In the sauce
    • Chris Stanley's Bazaar
Re: Southampton (H): The post match thread
« Reply #121 on: April 19, 2014, 11:20:57 PM »
This is where I do not get the tactics at times.  He plays Albrighton on the wing - great.  Then he plays a small bloke up front.  It is the one game where I thought Holt should start for that reason alone.  He then brings Holt on and I cannot recall another Albrighton cross after that!
Lambert sat down with Shay and Gordon and said "shall I play Albrighton?" Yes boss said Sid. "OK shall I play Gabby?" Boss you have to play a Gabby - fans favourites said Shay. "OK what about Weemwaan?" Oh you have to play him boss as he is due a goal said Sid. "Very well and where do you think I should play Holt?" Bench Boss said Shay and Sid in unison. "Thank you boys you have been massive this week"

The concerning thing is that at some point, the three of them must have decided our most effective outlet was via Albrighton, and that they all believed Weimann and Agbonlahor were the most likely players to exploit it.

Offline ciggiesnbeer

  • Member
  • Posts: 6794
  • Location: Mass hysteria for Aston Villa. Some team from the mountains in Russia
  • GM : 23.01.2019
Re: Southampton (H): The post match thread
« Reply #122 on: April 19, 2014, 11:22:54 PM »
Kozak has been gone long enough I have applied my rose coloured filter to him. I reckon he would have thrived on todays kind of game.

Why Rose coloured? He got 4 goals in 14 appearances and most of those were as Sub. I reckon that without that injury we would have got 2 strikers with scoring in double figures this season.

Oh I agree with you. I really like him.

I just know I have this tendency to make a player better and better the longer he has not played, figured I would be up front about it :)

Offline rougegorge

  • Member
  • Posts: 1597
Re: Southampton (H): The post match thread
« Reply #123 on: April 19, 2014, 11:25:10 PM »
MOTD will struggle with highlights. They weren't great in the last third thankfully but we turned in a typically pedestrian performance with little skill or flair. No risk of falling of the edge of the seat. Also Guzan's efforts to slow things down further in the last 10 minutes verged on time wasting and says a lot about the team's aspirations.

Online kippaxvilla2

  • Member
  • Posts: 28001
  • Location: Hatfield - the nice part of Donny.
Re: Southampton (H): The post match thread
« Reply #124 on: April 19, 2014, 11:28:11 PM »
Incredibly we are not on last.

Online rob_bridge

  • Member
  • Posts: 9657
  • Age: 53
  • Location: Shirleyshire
Re: Southampton (H): The post match thread
« Reply #125 on: April 19, 2014, 11:36:20 PM »
Fupp me - that was a penalty

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75957
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Southampton (H): The post match thread
« Reply #126 on: April 19, 2014, 11:36:54 PM »
Shearer reckons Shaw was the standout player. The same Luke Shaw that kept getting mugged by Albrighton.

Online SoccerHQ

  • Member
  • Posts: 43240
  • Location: Down, down, deeper and Down.
  • GM : 19.06.2021
Re: Southampton (H): The post match thread
« Reply #127 on: April 19, 2014, 11:37:44 PM »
How come this was your first home game of the season Kippax, seems a strange time of the season to end a boycott?

Where you one of those "I ain't going to that Culverhouse leaves" brigade? ;)

Online Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33199
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2025
Re: Southampton (H): The post match thread
« Reply #128 on: April 19, 2014, 11:39:43 PM »
Shearer reckons Shaw was the standout player. The same Luke Shaw that kept getting mugged by Albrighton.

No no no, weren't you listening, he didn't have much to do defensively.

Online Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33199
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2025
Re: Southampton (H): The post match thread
« Reply #129 on: April 19, 2014, 11:41:07 PM »
Fupp me - that was a penalty

Depends whether you decide the rule is handball in the box is a definite penalty, or you go DELIBERATE handball in the box is a penalty like the laws state.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75957
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Southampton (H): The post match thread
« Reply #130 on: April 19, 2014, 11:44:46 PM »
I'd have wanted a penalty for that if it was against us. I think Bertrand was worried as well as he spent a while doing the whole 'i'm rubbing my face a lot because it hurts from where the ball smacked me in the face, honest' routine.

Offline Tom_Mc9?

  • Member
  • Posts: 5009
  • Location: Sutton Coldfield
  • GM : 28.08.2024
Re: Southampton (H): The post match thread
« Reply #131 on: April 19, 2014, 11:45:03 PM »
Lots of huff and puff. Good effort but not enough ability unfortunately. Good to see a small improvement.

Online Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33199
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2025
Re: Southampton (H): The post match thread
« Reply #132 on: April 19, 2014, 11:45:17 PM »
Talking about the officials, anyone else reckon the ref had forgotten his cards in the first half and didn't want to be embarrassed. I had the count as three yellows to us and one to them in the first half. Unfortunately because he had been letting them go, it meant their number 5 didn't get his marching orders 2nd half when he was on a yellow and took out Gabby in full flight.

Online rob_bridge

  • Member
  • Posts: 9657
  • Age: 53
  • Location: Shirleyshire
Re: Southampton (H): The post match thread
« Reply #133 on: April 19, 2014, 11:47:00 PM »
Fupp me - that was a penalty

Depends whether you decide the rule is handball in the box is a definite penalty, or you go DELIBERATE handball in the box is a penalty like the laws state.

Thanks - I know the laws and it looked a penalty to me. Hence the colloquial first person qualifier.


Online Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33199
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2025
Re: Southampton (H): The post match thread
« Reply #134 on: April 19, 2014, 11:47:33 PM »
I'd have wanted a penalty for that if it was against us. I think Bertrand was worried as well as he spent a while doing the whole 'i'm rubbing my face a lot because it hurts from where the ball smacked me in the face, honest' routine.

Hey, my particular ruling is if the arm is away from the body, then should be a penalty, but as the ball was blasted at him from about a yard and half and he didn't move it towards the ball, I can see why it wasn't given under the laws of the game.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal