Quote from: PeterWithesShin on January 03, 2014, 12:21:35 AMI remember the days when FA Cup attendances were nearly always a good size above league ones. And the main ambition of just about every player was to win it. Season 67/68 which I remember.R3. Millwall at home. 34,703 for the cup game, 14,891 for the league game.R4. Rotherham at home. 33,442 for the cup game, 13,673 for the league game.
I remember the days when FA Cup attendances were nearly always a good size above league ones. And the main ambition of just about every player was to win it.
Quote from: Drummond on January 03, 2014, 12:13:20 PMThe league is after all our bread and butter. Without it and the revenue it generates, the club would be in the stink, people wouldn't have jobs and the fans would desert the club.The Cup is a nice to win, for the big clubs (i.e. us) the early rounds of the Cup are a distraction from the day-to-day, it's the latter stages or when playing a big rival, that the Cup generates interest these days.If we can't challenge for the cups AND maintain our place in the Premier League, then we're no longer a big club.
The league is after all our bread and butter. Without it and the revenue it generates, the club would be in the stink, people wouldn't have jobs and the fans would desert the club.The Cup is a nice to win, for the big clubs (i.e. us) the early rounds of the Cup are a distraction from the day-to-day, it's the latter stages or when playing a big rival, that the Cup generates interest these days.
I paid £10 for my ticket in the Lower North.
We're big in terms of most of football in this country, however, I'm under no illusion that we aren't one of the big five or six in many ways and haven't been for a while.
@MatKendrick: Regardless of what PL said or how it has been interpreted, the biggest shame is Villa feel they can no longer 'compete' on more than 1 front
Look at the team selections this weekend from the Prem league sides and then tell me it's only Lambert you prioritizes league ...