I can understand that differentiation Villadroid and thank you for it. Right enough, the physical symptoms of alcoholics (DTs and seizures) is ample evidence but I know many functioning alcoholics who are no less gripped by the condition. I think there is no difference between the people you've described as boozers and those you call alcoholics. If people class themselves in your 'boozers' category they'll never truly grasp the need for a life changing decision about their drinking, denial is commonplace in that they think they can return to social drinking after a period of sobriety when all that leads to is a new rock bottom.
There is absolutely no denying the destructive grip alcohol has on some people's lives but whether it is caused by addiction or selfishness is open to debate.I suppose I tend to think that when people claim that they are victims of an addiction they are avoiding personal responsibility, a conclusion which is usually supported by their their lies, craftiness and manipulation.When they give it up for a good while and then choose to go back to the booze, I have little doubt that they are just being self-indulgent and not responding to a physical need.
When they give it up for a good while and then choose to go back to the booze, I have little doubt that they are just being self-indulgent and not responding to a physical need.
I suppose I tend to think that when people claim that they are victims of an addiction they are avoiding personal responsibility, a conclusion which is usually supported by their their lies, craftiness and manipulation.When they give it up for a good while and then choose to go back to the booze, I have little doubt that they are just being self-indulgent and not responding to a physical need.
Villadroid when you have any idea what you're talking about when it comes to addiction, specifically alcoholism (which is one of the worst addictions to do anything about because of the social aspects of it) then please continue to post but what you've written up there is disgraceful. I've had a family member die from conditions resulting from alcoholism and worked for a number of years with an alcoholic and the idea that you can suggest it's self-indulgent is utterly repugnant.
anyone familiar with the psychological theory of Transactional Analysis
I apologise if you are offended but my cynical view of alcohol abusers but it is not entirely a novel invention on my part and anyone familiar with the psychological theory of Transactional Analysis would not find it strange at all.
Quote from: paul_e on July 18, 2013, 03:18:44 PMVilladroid when you have any idea what you're talking about when it comes to addiction, specifically alcoholism (which is one of the worst addictions to do anything about because of the social aspects of it) then please continue to post but what you've written up there is disgraceful. I've had a family member die from conditions resulting from alcoholism and worked for a number of years with an alcoholic and the idea that you can suggest it's self-indulgent is utterly repugnant.I think it would be hard to find a family which hasn't had a member die from the result of alcohol abuse. I apologise if you are offended but my cynical view of alcohol abusers but it is not entirely a novel invention on my part and anyone familiar with the psychological theory of Transactional Analysis would not find it strange at all.
Quoteanyone familiar with the psychological theory of Transactional AnalysisOh yeah, a football fans' forum is bursting with contributors who are familiar with this. When I'm on long journeys home after an away defeat, I talk of little else.