Nicklas Helenius

[richl]

Will I get banned if I think someone is a prick?

If you think it no, if you say it, yes.

What if i think someone is a twat? beginning with G

[PeterWithesShin]

Will I get banned if I think someone is a prick?

If you think it no, if you say it, yes.

What if i think someone is a twat? beginning with G

You are allowed to say it about Gerrard.

[Greg N'Ash]

Ah, I see what I did there, too much Lambert and Lerner in posts. I apologise for getting the Brewsters Millions wrong.

However it still remains that you called me a liar before I made that mistake.

I think its best we leave it there. You obviously read into my posts all sorts of things not intended. If you told me tonight someone would put up an attack by me on Lerner/Faulkner as proof of my long term hatred for lambert i'd never have believed it.

Actually I think it best you explain how I am a liar.

the fact that the whole post you put up is about lerner/faulkner and not lambert. especially the bit you higlighted

How is this not about Lambert? "sack Lambert tomorrow because he's not good enough to carry it out"

try printing the bit beforehand and the bit after or maybe give it up  and stop abusing your position

[richl]

So if i named someone who I thought was a twat on this board would I be be banned?

[Greg N'Ash]

So if i named someone who I thought was a twat on this board would I be be banned?

 I doubt it.

[richl]

So if i named someone who I thought was a twat on this board would I be be banned?

 I doubt it.

So if i named someone who I thought was a twat on this board would I be be banned?

 I doubt it.

Are you assuming I'm talking about you?

[PeterWithesShin]

try printing the bit beforehand and the bit after or maybe give it up  and stop abusing your position

You mean like I did first time, and you called me a liar for it?

Here you go Greg, here is your post in full, again, with your reply where called me a liar for posting it. So where did I lie Greg?

The prosecution would like admit exhibit A. This would be the first post made by the defendant upon his return after a 6 month absence. The post was made in a thread about one Randolph D. Lerner, but I have highlighted the relevant part which I believe shows the defendant was against Mr Lambert at that time.

He's been a disaster. Whatever mitigating circumstances you can use to justify his calamitous reign, it's his hole and he still keeps digging. Ever since pubehead slung his hook he's veered from one disaster to another. Fucked over Houllier for the old guard for the sake of his wallet - where are these players now? - injured, stinking up our team or stinking up other teams. Then he bought in TSM which is up there with anything those clowns at Blackburn have managed but at least the guy realised how shit we were and played to survive. This is like groundhog day but with a manager without any tactical awareness - forget chelsea, we could be breaking all sorts of records if he keeps putting out the same formation and team. The guy has lost the youngsters totally - the confidence is rock bottom true, but he's not even organising them properly. You're not gonna improve confidence if no-ones knows what they're fucking supposed to do.

As i see it Lerner has three choices:

1) Stick with his ridiculouse Ajax of the midlands plan and sack Lambert tomorrow because he's not good enough to carry it out - I'm not sure who is mind, but anything is better than getting pummelled by 5 goals a game as we slide into oblivion

2) Sack Faulkner and drop 20+m in the managers lap, or another manager's lap.  fuck off the likes of Dunne, Gabby, Ireland, Nzogbia, gGiven for bargain basement prices because they'll be near enough worthless in the championship anyway and they really aren't going to get better - how many Villa players can you think off who've been shite for 2 or three seasons  in a row and then come good? Nope neither can I.   Cut our losses,just get something for the wasters or pay up their contracts because we'll be doing it next summer anyway. Then pray that 20m together with the few decent youth players is enough to keep us up.

3) Keep Calm and go again.


I'm guessing Lerner hasn't finished digging yet so 3) looks the best bet

2013 is certainly shaping up to be a classic and no mistake....

that in bold is  an attack against Faulkner and Lerner and that aimed at lambert was undoubtably true at the time. Read a post dated the same date about lambert as you probably have but ignored . Please stop lying, it does you no credit.

[Greg N'Ash]

So if i named someone who I thought was a twat on this board would I be be banned?

 I doubt it.

So if i named someone who I thought was a twat on this board would I be be banned?

 I doubt it.

Are you assuming I'm talking about you?

not at all. If you are, its a free country. I wouldn't be offended

[richl]

So if i named someone who I thought was a twat on this board would I be be banned?

 I doubt it.

So if i named someone who I thought was a twat on this board would I be be banned?

 I doubt it.

Are you assuming I'm talking about you?

not at all. If you are, its a free country. I wouldn't be offended

Good job then

[Greg N'Ash]

try printing the bit beforehand and the bit after or maybe give it up  and stop abusing your position

You mean like I did first time, and you called me a liar for it?

Here you go Greg, here is your post in full, again, with your reply where called me a liar for posting it. So where did I lie Greg?

The prosecution would like admit exhibit A. This would be the first post made by the defendant upon his return after a 6 month absence. The post was made in a thread about one Randolph D. Lerner, but I have highlighted the relevant part which I believe shows the defendant was against Mr Lambert at that time.

He's been a disaster. Whatever mitigating circumstances you can use to justify his calamitous reign, it's his hole and he still keeps digging. Ever since pubehead slung his hook he's veered from one disaster to another. Fucked over Houllier for the old guard for the sake of his wallet - where are these players now? - injured, stinking up our team or stinking up other teams. Then he bought in TSM which is up there with anything those clowns at Blackburn have managed but at least the guy realised how shit we were and played to survive. This is like groundhog day but with a manager without any tactical awareness - forget chelsea, we could be breaking all sorts of records if he keeps putting out the same formation and team. The guy has lost the youngsters totally - the confidence is rock bottom true, but he's not even organising them properly. You're not gonna improve confidence if no-ones knows what they're fucking supposed to do.

As i see it Lerner has three choices:

1) Stick with his ridiculouse Ajax of the midlands plan and sack Lambert tomorrow because he's not good enough to carry it out - I'm not sure who is mind, but anything is better than getting pummelled by 5 goals a game as we slide into oblivion

2) Sack Faulkner and drop 20+m in the managers lap, or another manager's lap.  fuck off the likes of Dunne, Gabby, Ireland, Nzogbia, gGiven for bargain basement prices because they'll be near enough worthless in the championship anyway and they really aren't going to get better - how many Villa players can you think off who've been shite for 2 or three seasons  in a row and then come good? Nope neither can I.   Cut our losses,just get something for the wasters or pay up their contracts because we'll be doing it next summer anyway. Then pray that 20m together with the few decent youth players is enough to keep us up.

3) Keep Calm and go again.


I'm guessing Lerner hasn't finished digging yet so 3) looks the best bet

2013 is certainly shaping up to be a classic and no mistake....

that in bold is  an attack against Faulkner and Lerner and that aimed at lambert was undoubtably true at the time. Read a post dated the same date about lambert as you probably have but ignored . Please stop lying, it does you no credit.

I called you a liar because i thought no-one could seriously come to the conclusion you did from my original post. If i misjudged you and you're a bit...erm i not sure of the word really, without getting into a continuous cycle of apologies.....challenged say, then i'm sorry. Its like me saying you hated Houllier and digging up a post of yours having a go at Mccallister

[PeterWithesShin]

You are right Greg, how on earth could I think you didn't rate Lambert when your first post back mentions one of the 3 options Lerner has is sacking him because he's not good enough.

Still, at least you weren't stretching the truth when you said you always wanted Lambert. Or are you challenged and you forgot?

i find it hard to take some bloke lecturing me on supporting lambert when I wanted him, and  YOU wanted some ex-ManU  non-entity because you thought a bit of glory hunter bling would rub-off

i just hope we don't get lambert because he's the one Lerner would be stupid enough to give a  big contract to and he looks the favourite. Gone by this time next year if he comes

Lambert is just a 2nd rate MON. I'd be gutted if he turned up. even has the same disloyalty gene.

[TheSandman]

So this Nicklas Helenius seems like a good player, then?

[richl]

Greg, what do you think of our current manager and PWS?

You can say anything as long as you only think it!

[Sexual Ealing]

I can only assume that Gareth Barry wasn't on the pitch for some reason.

[richl]

I can only assume that Gareth Barry wasn't on the pitch for some reason.

Appendicitis