Didn't Spurs try this trick with Benteke last summer, offering about 5 players in return?That said, 5m, Dawson and Holtby. I'd probably do the deal tbh.
So we can't offer Vlaar a bigger wage but might take 2 players in all probability currently on higher wages than Vlaar? Can't see it myself? Dawson also isn't an adequate replacement for Vlaar.
I actaully think Dawson and Holtby, plus a bit of cash would be a good deal. Dawson isn't necessairly as good as Vlaar, but given the injuries Vlaar picks up and the games he misses, that might balance out.Holtby would be a good option for an attacking player, plus a bit of cash to maybe beef up the pot that we have to spend on central midfield.
Quote from: Ads on July 24, 2014, 09:27:01 AMI actaully think Dawson and Holtby, plus a bit of cash would be a good deal. Dawson isn't necessairly as good as Vlaar, but given the injuries Vlaar picks up and the games he misses, that might balance out.Holtby would be a good option for an attacking player, plus a bit of cash to maybe beef up the pot that we have to spend on central midfield.Dawson wouldn't be an adequate replacement, as injury prone as Vlaar and he doesn't want to leave London I understand.Spud fans seem to have a wide range of opinions about Holtby. If the club want to get rid of him I'd suspect the manager doesn't rate him and he didn't make the german squad for Brazil.Does Dawson really improve on Vlaar fitness wise? I seem to remember him missing half a season a couple of times in the last few years.
I've always rated Dawson, he's arguably as good as any of the 4 centre halves England took to the World Cup.