Its not football that is racist or homophobic but,with special regard to the latter, its typical of male humour in not understanding something so resorting to playground humour. Its legislation that changes attitudes and politicising the issues not well meaning white liberals who've done nothing to support gay rights.
The pressure to change legislation is more than likely to come from well meaning liberals. I have to say it amuses me greatly every time someone uses the phrase "well meaning" as if it's some sort of put-down.
Quote from: hilts_coolerking on January 06, 2013, 02:02:45 PMThe pressure to change legislation is more than likely to come from well meaning liberals. I have to say it amuses me greatly every time someone uses the phrase "well meaning" as if it's some sort of put-down.Similarly with the term "do gooder", when you think about it.
Games makers.Fucking c***s.Is it alright to say that?
Quote from: bertlambshank on January 06, 2013, 02:37:04 PMGames makers.Fucking c***s.Is it alright to say that?Probably, but why would you want to?
Quote from: 5ft811st2 Durham on January 06, 2013, 01:08:38 PMQuote from: paul_e on January 05, 2013, 10:41:58 PMI find it completely unpredictable that this thread threatens to turn into a "you're less tolerant than me" spamfest.On topic, Fair play to Jarvis, he's put himself in the firing line for something he believes in, if by doing this a few youngsters who are thinking of not following up on a career because they're gay and are terrified end up sticking with the game then he's achieved something. Getting fans (as a group not individuals) attitudes to change will be much slower.I imagine his priority was making a few quid and raising his profile.Obviously, a Premiership footballer has to do everything he can to make a crust
Quote from: paul_e on January 05, 2013, 10:41:58 PMI find it completely unpredictable that this thread threatens to turn into a "you're less tolerant than me" spamfest.On topic, Fair play to Jarvis, he's put himself in the firing line for something he believes in, if by doing this a few youngsters who are thinking of not following up on a career because they're gay and are terrified end up sticking with the game then he's achieved something. Getting fans (as a group not individuals) attitudes to change will be much slower.I imagine his priority was making a few quid and raising his profile.
I find it completely unpredictable that this thread threatens to turn into a "you're less tolerant than me" spamfest.On topic, Fair play to Jarvis, he's put himself in the firing line for something he believes in, if by doing this a few youngsters who are thinking of not following up on a career because they're gay and are terrified end up sticking with the game then he's achieved something. Getting fans (as a group not individuals) attitudes to change will be much slower.
On the same course we were told that we need to use an universal language as some foreigners would find some aspects of English difficult to understand. The course leader then casually said,"Yes and that's just the Americans", which prompted some light laughter.At this point I asked why he'd said American and not Chinese or Indian? That was met by him blushing and mumbling "Well that's well erm different".
Quote from: peter w on January 06, 2013, 09:00:58 AMIts not football that is racist or homophobic but,with special regard to the latter, its typical of male humour in not understanding something so resorting to playground humour. Its legislation that changes attitudes and politicising the issues not well meaning white liberals who've done nothing to support gay rights.The pressure to change legislation is more than likely to come from well meaning liberals. I have to say it amuses me greatly every time someone uses the phrase "well meaning" as if it's some sort of put-down.