Greg returns = 30 pages by this time tomorrow.
Quote from: Dave Clark Five on December 29, 2012, 10:49:52 PMQuote from: Ad@m on December 29, 2012, 10:26:29 PMQuote from: bertlambshank on December 29, 2012, 10:24:03 PMQuote from: Ad@m on December 29, 2012, 10:21:51 PMQuote from: bertlambshank on December 29, 2012, 10:16:12 PMHe hasn't run any business,that's part of the problem.You're right - he's not a businessman, he's a benefactor. Which is a hell of a lot better than our previous Chairman who was in it for personal profile & gain, the good of the club coming way down his list of priorities.how is it better?How much do we owe him in loans again?It's better because he's putting money in to the club whereas the last chairman was taking money out of the club.If the club owes Lerner money what does it matter? He can't call it in as the club doesn't have the money. So he chooses not to put any more in - that was how Herbert ran the club.This is the thing that I struggle with. Lerner buys the club from Ellis but borrows money from the club. Who are 'the club'? I thought that was what Lerner had bought so how can he borrow money from it.Regarding Doug Ellis. We used to see a set of accounts every year. Did anybody expect a Chairman, running a business, to throw millions of pounds of his own money into it? His job was to at least balance the books. The day when everyone needs someone like Abramovich as Chairman (or whatever title he has) is the day to pack up. Hes back
Quote from: Ad@m on December 29, 2012, 10:26:29 PMQuote from: bertlambshank on December 29, 2012, 10:24:03 PMQuote from: Ad@m on December 29, 2012, 10:21:51 PMQuote from: bertlambshank on December 29, 2012, 10:16:12 PMHe hasn't run any business,that's part of the problem.You're right - he's not a businessman, he's a benefactor. Which is a hell of a lot better than our previous Chairman who was in it for personal profile & gain, the good of the club coming way down his list of priorities.how is it better?How much do we owe him in loans again?It's better because he's putting money in to the club whereas the last chairman was taking money out of the club.If the club owes Lerner money what does it matter? He can't call it in as the club doesn't have the money. So he chooses not to put any more in - that was how Herbert ran the club.This is the thing that I struggle with. Lerner buys the club from Ellis but borrows money from the club. Who are 'the club'? I thought that was what Lerner had bought so how can he borrow money from it.Regarding Doug Ellis. We used to see a set of accounts every year. Did anybody expect a Chairman, running a business, to throw millions of pounds of his own money into it? His job was to at least balance the books. The day when everyone needs someone like Abramovich as Chairman (or whatever title he has) is the day to pack up.
Quote from: bertlambshank on December 29, 2012, 10:24:03 PMQuote from: Ad@m on December 29, 2012, 10:21:51 PMQuote from: bertlambshank on December 29, 2012, 10:16:12 PMHe hasn't run any business,that's part of the problem.You're right - he's not a businessman, he's a benefactor. Which is a hell of a lot better than our previous Chairman who was in it for personal profile & gain, the good of the club coming way down his list of priorities.how is it better?How much do we owe him in loans again?It's better because he's putting money in to the club whereas the last chairman was taking money out of the club.If the club owes Lerner money what does it matter? He can't call it in as the club doesn't have the money. So he chooses not to put any more in - that was how Herbert ran the club.
Quote from: Ad@m on December 29, 2012, 10:21:51 PMQuote from: bertlambshank on December 29, 2012, 10:16:12 PMHe hasn't run any business,that's part of the problem.You're right - he's not a businessman, he's a benefactor. Which is a hell of a lot better than our previous Chairman who was in it for personal profile & gain, the good of the club coming way down his list of priorities.how is it better?How much do we owe him in loans again?
Quote from: bertlambshank on December 29, 2012, 10:16:12 PMHe hasn't run any business,that's part of the problem.You're right - he's not a businessman, he's a benefactor. Which is a hell of a lot better than our previous Chairman who was in it for personal profile & gain, the good of the club coming way down his list of priorities.
He hasn't run any business,that's part of the problem.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on December 29, 2012, 11:08:01 PMGreg returns = 30 pages by this time tomorrow.Probably. Because people actually take his views at face value and fail to realise he's on a huge wind up.
Quote from: Dave Clark Five on December 29, 2012, 10:49:52 PMThis is the thing that I struggle with. Lerner buys the club from Ellis but borrows money from the club. Who are 'the club'? I thought that was what Lerner had bought so how can he borrow money from it.The club, which is owned by Lerner, has been lent money, by Lerner, at a certain rate of interest, to be repaid at a certain date.
This is the thing that I struggle with. Lerner buys the club from Ellis but borrows money from the club. Who are 'the club'? I thought that was what Lerner had bought so how can he borrow money from it.
I was happy when Randy bought the club and have backed him from the time it all started going tits up from the time O'Neill walked out. This evening though Randy is at a crisis point. If he wants to protect his investment he has to back his manager and provide enough funds next month to get us out of this terrible mess we're now in. If he doesn't he is 1) a poor businessman and 2) no longer cares about the club because the team as it stands is going to be relegated. We have a defence that can't defend, an attack that can't score and a midfield that can't protect the defence nor provide chances for the strikers. We've hit rock bottom but amazingly we've not yet been cut adrift. Decisive leadership now can still turn the season round. Failure to take it cannot be an option.
So much ignorance on this page that it is hard to know where to begin, but if you really think that the board chose Lambert "because it is what the fans wanted," then you are past reasoning with.But I agree that there is no excuse for the AM appt. Before that, when MON left us deep in it, I thought the Houllier appt had potential, esp considering all the available options at the time. He might have been on the right track, but the heart issues means we will never know for certain.