...Appointing a person to effectivley vet potential signings is not ideal, these "Director of football" types almost inevitably lead to friction within clubs, just look at Spurs and Liverpool, theres nothing wrong with a chairman having faith in his managers choices, although, given. that began to backfire badly under MON, the opposite of all this is an Abramovitch type who seems to pressure managers into signing players he likes - often with disasterous results.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on March 14, 2013, 05:26:25 PMQuote from: martin o`who?? on March 14, 2013, 04:00:54 PMLerners stewardship of the club gets some unfair criticsm, RL`s one major strategic blunder was appointing Alex Mcleish in the face of violent opposition, not giving MON the Milner cash was entirely understandable, and probably necessary for the good of the clubs finances, no-one expected MON to quit in the manner he did, which is where it all started to unravel, the Houlier appointment was ill-starred for obvious reasons, but where did the club take medical advice regarding his Heart condition?. Lerner has spent a significant, if diminishing amount of money on a club who`s average gates are not colossal by any means, He delivered Paul Lambert as the overwhelming fans choice after Mcleish was dismissed, where Lerner needs to improve is in his PR which is non existent at a time when the club needs visible leadership. Apponting McLeish was a strategic blunder, that much is true (and it's putting it a bit lightly), but I think you're missing the bit where he's really been a failure.His failure to appoint people at the club with some football nous led to us relying on one manager's word that everything was fine for far too long. There was nobody with an overview keeping an eye on contracts which needed to be renewed, or players which needed to be moved on, other than the manager of the day.That was his main failure at the Browns, too, poor appointments.Look how many players we've signed since 2006 who have been on big money, barely featured, sat out the length of their contracts, and walked away for nothing.Nigel Reo-Coker's total cost to the club, for example, isn't much short of £20m. Then take a look at what the likes of Cuellar, Heskey, and Beye have cost, given that they all walked away for nowt, too.Don't get me wrong, Lerner didn't choose those players, but Lerner also didn't put anyone in at the club to make sure this sort of wastage didn't happen. When he finally did stick a Chief Executive in and give him this job, it turned out to be someone who had previously run a call centre for MBNA and who knew nothing about the game.Being a good chairman isn't only about putting money in, it is about running the club well, and on that front, he's made a catalogue of costly errors that have left us where we are today.Really poor.Appointing a person to effectivley vet potential signings is not ideal, these "Director of football" types almost inevitably lead to friction within clubs, just look at Spurs and Liverpool, theres nothing wrong with a chairman having faith in his managers choices, although, given. that began to backfire badly under MON, the opposite of all this is an Abramovitch type who seems to pressure managers into signing players he likes - often with disasterous results.
Quote from: martin o`who?? on March 14, 2013, 04:00:54 PMLerners stewardship of the club gets some unfair criticsm, RL`s one major strategic blunder was appointing Alex Mcleish in the face of violent opposition, not giving MON the Milner cash was entirely understandable, and probably necessary for the good of the clubs finances, no-one expected MON to quit in the manner he did, which is where it all started to unravel, the Houlier appointment was ill-starred for obvious reasons, but where did the club take medical advice regarding his Heart condition?. Lerner has spent a significant, if diminishing amount of money on a club who`s average gates are not colossal by any means, He delivered Paul Lambert as the overwhelming fans choice after Mcleish was dismissed, where Lerner needs to improve is in his PR which is non existent at a time when the club needs visible leadership. Apponting McLeish was a strategic blunder, that much is true (and it's putting it a bit lightly), but I think you're missing the bit where he's really been a failure.His failure to appoint people at the club with some football nous led to us relying on one manager's word that everything was fine for far too long. There was nobody with an overview keeping an eye on contracts which needed to be renewed, or players which needed to be moved on, other than the manager of the day.That was his main failure at the Browns, too, poor appointments.Look how many players we've signed since 2006 who have been on big money, barely featured, sat out the length of their contracts, and walked away for nothing.Nigel Reo-Coker's total cost to the club, for example, isn't much short of £20m. Then take a look at what the likes of Cuellar, Heskey, and Beye have cost, given that they all walked away for nowt, too.Don't get me wrong, Lerner didn't choose those players, but Lerner also didn't put anyone in at the club to make sure this sort of wastage didn't happen. When he finally did stick a Chief Executive in and give him this job, it turned out to be someone who had previously run a call centre for MBNA and who knew nothing about the game.Being a good chairman isn't only about putting money in, it is about running the club well, and on that front, he's made a catalogue of costly errors that have left us where we are today.Really poor.
Lerners stewardship of the club gets some unfair criticsm, RL`s one major strategic blunder was appointing Alex Mcleish in the face of violent opposition, not giving MON the Milner cash was entirely understandable, and probably necessary for the good of the clubs finances, no-one expected MON to quit in the manner he did, which is where it all started to unravel, the Houlier appointment was ill-starred for obvious reasons, but where did the club take medical advice regarding his Heart condition?. Lerner has spent a significant, if diminishing amount of money on a club who`s average gates are not colossal by any means, He delivered Paul Lambert as the overwhelming fans choice after Mcleish was dismissed, where Lerner needs to improve is in his PR which is non existent at a time when the club needs visible leadership.
Aston Villa's Paul Lambert says owner Randy Lerner deserves credit• Villa manager feels American receives 'unfair criticism'• Scot wants to stay at club even if they were relegatedStuart James The Guardian, Friday 15 March 2013 22.30 GMT Paul Lambert has robustly defended Randy Lerner ahead of Saturday's critical relegation battle against Queens Park Rangers, with the Aston Villa manager claiming that the much-criticised American owner has "done one hell of a lot for this club".The Villa manager also praised Lerner for being "straight and honest" with him during a season when three of the other bottom-five clubs have sacked their manager. The most recent of those dismissals came on Monday, when Reading terminated Brian McDermott's contract following the 2-1 defeat against Villa. Lambert felt it was a hugely unfair decision and, highlighting the sacking of Nigel Adkins at Southampton a couple of months earlier, criticised a culture where managers lose their job depending on whether their face fits.Lambert's own position could hardly be more secure, despite the fact that Villa remain only one place above the bottom three. Having met with Lerner on Thursday, Lambert spoke about the strength of his relationship with the Villa owner, who has been criticised in some quarters for not spending more money in January and also for rarely turning up to see matches.Asked whether he had feared for his position, Lambert replied: "I don't think you worry about it. I've been in the game long enough to know what happens. But I also know that, going by certain things, you don't always have to win games to [avoid] getting the sack. If your face doesn't fit now and people don't like you..."But I've got a really good relationship with the chairman here. He's always been straight and honest. He's been very good with me. I think Randy gets unfair criticism, I really do, for someone who has done one hell of a lot for this club. He's a good guy."The former Norwich manager wants to carry on in charge even if Villa are relegated. "I hope [I can continue]. It's a brilliant club. I love being here. But that will be for other people to decide," he said.
I agree with Lambert, 'Randy' has done a hell of a lot at the club.I hope the medical staff at Bodymoor Heath manage to get Lambert's tongue out of his arse in time for today's game.
Fuckin ell Fletch, that was quick.
The former Norwich manager wants to carry on in charge even if Villa are relegated. "I hope [I can continue]. It's a brilliant club. I love being here. But that will be for other people to decide," he said. I thought he was saying a few weeks ago he had been told his job was safe even if relegated ,seems from yesterday's quotes that is by no means guaranteed.Lets hope for a storming end to the season starting today.
lets hope he boards the titantic 2 for his return journey
Quote from: adrenachrome on March 16, 2013, 10:05:02 AMFuckin ell Fletch, that was quick.Uncanny.Exactly what my Wife said last night.
Slow down, you movin' too fastYou gotta make the MORNING lastJust kickin' down the cobblestonesLookin' for fun andFeelin' groovy_
Randy hasn't had anything like the levels of vitriol Ellis received. As for the face fitting comment, what / who is he referencing? Off thing to say.