collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Leander Dendoncker by Beard82
[August 06, 2025, 11:49:53 PM]


Boxing 2025 by Rory
[August 06, 2025, 11:47:30 PM]


Pre season 2025 by Bent Neilsens Screamer
[August 06, 2025, 11:41:24 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by brontebilly
[August 06, 2025, 10:46:28 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[August 06, 2025, 10:35:07 PM]


Reserves and Academy 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[August 06, 2025, 10:30:55 PM]


Kits 25/26 by VillaTim
[August 06, 2025, 09:56:02 PM]


Lucas Digne by PaulWinch again
[August 06, 2025, 09:03:42 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Leander Dendoncker by Beard82
[August 06, 2025, 11:49:53 PM]


Re: Boxing 2025 by Rory
[August 06, 2025, 11:47:30 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by Bent Neilsens Screamer
[August 06, 2025, 11:41:24 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by Olneythelonely
[August 06, 2025, 11:37:40 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by Bent Neilsens Screamer
[August 06, 2025, 11:37:07 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by VillaTim
[August 06, 2025, 11:28:48 PM]


Re: Leander Dendoncker by stevo_st
[August 06, 2025, 11:19:09 PM]


Re: Leander Dendoncker by Somniloquism
[August 06, 2025, 11:08:53 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Randy Lerner  (Read 169346 times)

Offline Rip Van We Go Again

  • Member
  • Posts: 26039
  • Location: Up and down, i'm up the wall, i'm up the bloody tree
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #90 on: December 29, 2012, 11:09:15 PM »
Greg returns = 30 pages by this time tomorrow.
Probably. Because people actually take his views at face value and fail to realise he's on a huge wind up.

Offline Dave Clark Five

  • Member
  • Posts: 9767
  • Location: In Doctor Who's Tardis trying to find Villa Park anytime between 1970 and 1972.
  • GM : June, 2013
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #91 on: December 29, 2012, 11:13:48 PM »
He hasn't run any business,that's part of the problem.

You're right - he's not a businessman, he's a benefactor.  Which is a hell of a lot better than our previous Chairman who was in it for personal profile & gain, the good of the club coming way down his list of priorities.
how is it better?
How much do we owe him in loans again?

It's better because he's putting money in to the club whereas the last chairman was taking money out of the club.

If the club owes Lerner money what does it matter?  He can't call it in as the club doesn't have the money.  So he chooses not to put any more in - that was how Herbert ran the club.

This is the thing that I struggle with. Lerner buys the club from Ellis but borrows money from the club. Who are 'the club'? I thought that was what Lerner had bought so how can he borrow money from it.

Regarding Doug Ellis. We used to see a set of accounts every year. Did anybody expect a Chairman, running a business, to throw millions of pounds of his own money into it? His job was to at least balance the books. The day when everyone needs someone like Abramovich as Chairman (or whatever title he has) is the day to pack up.
 
Hes back
I've never gone away.

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #92 on: December 29, 2012, 11:13:51 PM »
Greg returns = 30 pages by this time tomorrow.
Probably. Because people actually take his views at face value and fail to realise he's on a huge wind up.
Nothing wrong with his first post back.

Offline Whiney MacWhineface

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12313
  • Location: East Sussex
  • GM : 25.01.2026
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #93 on: December 29, 2012, 11:13:55 PM »
This is the thing that I struggle with. Lerner buys the club from Ellis but borrows money from the club. Who are 'the club'? I thought that was what Lerner had bought so how can he borrow money from it.

The club, which is owned by Lerner, has been lent money, by Lerner, at a certain rate of interest, to be repaid at a certain date.

A sizeable chunk has been put into the club by Lerner's Trust in the form of shares rather than loans, and at least one year the loans were interest free. All the same the biggest chunk is attracting interest at those oh-so-not-rigged LIBOR rates plus 1% or 1.5% plus management fees. I've posted links to these in the past but can barely be arsed to type let alone find them again :-)

Offline hawkeye

  • Member
  • Posts: 8973
  • GM : Jun, 2012
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #94 on: December 29, 2012, 11:27:47 PM »
Like a grizzly old cowboy, he saunters into town looking for another turn of the wheel, he hears they are playin his tune down at the last chance saloon.

Offline Eigentor

  • Muppet Hero
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1572
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #95 on: December 29, 2012, 11:40:20 PM »
There's little doubt that there's an air of amateurishness in the way the club is run.

One example is appointment of managers. Alex McLeish was appointed because of his likeableness, perhaps even because Alex Ferguson recommended him. And while I supported the appointment of Lambert, I remember one of the (main) reasons for appointing him was that he was the man the fans wanted. It seems as if the actual capability of doing a good job hardly comes into the equation.

Offline Des Little

  • Member
  • Posts: 12826
  • Location: A5 Ultra
  • GM : 03.05.2021
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #96 on: December 29, 2012, 11:56:59 PM »
It's rapidly becoming a shambles, if it isn't already. I'm not sure anyone at the club has a plan of any kind and the end result is what we have now.  All aboard the Aston Titanic.

Offline Clark W Griswold

  • Member
  • Posts: 5239
  • Location: Wallyworld
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #97 on: December 30, 2012, 12:09:14 AM »
Lerner out. That is all.

Offline pelty

  • Member
  • Posts: 1174
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #98 on: December 30, 2012, 01:08:28 AM »
So much ignorance on this page that it is hard to know where to begin, but if you really think that the board chose Lambert "because it is what the fans wanted," then you are past reasoning with.

But I agree that there is no excuse for the AM appt. Before that, when MON left us deep in it, I thought the Houllier appt had potential, esp considering all the available options at the time. He might have been on the right track, but the heart issues means we will never know for certain.

Offline Yossarian

  • Member
  • Posts: 7233
  • Location: Holed-up
  • GM : June, 2013
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #99 on: December 30, 2012, 01:12:40 AM »
So Mr Pelty when has Mr Lerner ever been successful?

Offline JD

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10211
  • Location: Canterbury NZ
  • Stay Free
  • GM : 19.01.2026
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #100 on: December 30, 2012, 01:21:10 AM »
I was happy when Randy bought the club and have backed him from the time it all started going tits up from the time O'Neill walked out. This evening though Randy is at a crisis point. If he wants to protect his investment he has to back his manager and provide enough funds next month to get us out of this terrible mess we're now in. If he doesn't he is 1) a poor businessman and 2) no longer cares about the club because the team as it stands is going to be relegated. We have a defence that can't defend, an attack that can't score and a midfield that can't protect the defence nor provide chances for the strikers. We've hit rock bottom but amazingly we've not yet been cut adrift. Decisive leadership now can still turn the season round. Failure to take it cannot be an option.

Excellent post Sir.

That's exactly how I see it. This transfer window is make or break for Villa. C'mon Randy show some leadership. 

Offline Greg N'Ash

  • Member
  • Posts: 944
  • Location: birmingham
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #101 on: December 30, 2012, 01:26:16 AM »
well i have a lot of sympathy with you pelty but at the end of the day, however uncrap you think randy's been, its pretty obvious he's pissed loads of money up the wall for no return. i'd suggest if he wants to continue hands off he gets in football people instead of the likes of faulkner who lets face it should be running an Aldi supermarket somewhere. His wallet at least will feel better for it,.

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #102 on: December 30, 2012, 01:27:21 AM »
So much ignorance on this page that it is hard to know where to begin, but if you really think that the board chose Lambert "because it is what the fans wanted," then you are past reasoning with.

But I agree that there is no excuse for the AM appt. Before that, when MON left us deep in it, I thought the Houllier appt had potential, esp considering all the available options at the time. He might have been on the right track, but the heart issues means we will never know for certain.
Are you ever going to post on here without sounding arrogant?

Offline themossman

  • Member
  • Posts: 10107
  • Location: Bristol
  • GM : 06.05.2022
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #103 on: December 30, 2012, 01:41:57 AM »
So much ignorance on this page that it is hard to know where to begin, but if you really think that the board chose Lambert "because it is what the fans wanted," then you are past reasoning with.

But I agree that there is no excuse for the AM appt. Before that, when MON left us deep in it, I thought the Houllier appt had potential, esp considering all the available options at the time. He might have been on the right track, but the heart issues means we will never know for certain.

15 goals in 3 games, after the shit we've persevered with over the last 2 years, and you dare to question the attitude of the fans?

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #104 on: December 30, 2012, 01:42:46 AM »
This is what you posted on Oct 21st.
You seem to forget that MON left five days before the season and managers of any quality were not available. Houllier had a pedigree, at least, which was more than could be said for most of the managers queueing up for the job. Now, RL blew it with AM, no doubt...
It's almost word for word.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal