collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Kits 25/26 by VILLA MOLE
[Today at 05:42:06 PM]


The International Cricket Thread by Meanwood Villa
[Today at 05:37:07 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by pauliewalnuts
[Today at 05:25:06 PM]


FFP by kippaxvilla2
[Today at 05:23:30 PM]


International Rugby by UK Redsox
[Today at 04:27:48 PM]


Pre season 2025 by ChicagoLion
[Today at 03:54:07 PM]


Yasin Ozcan (now out on loan at Anderlecht) by Somniloquism
[Today at 01:41:10 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by VILLA MOLE
[Today at 11:18:27 AM]

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Stephen Ireland  (Read 158587 times)

Offline Goldie.7

  • Member
  • Posts: 5255
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #585 on: December 22, 2013, 03:50:37 AM »
Missing the point yet again. It's a mistake because hindsight shows he was shit for us. Virtually no one thought it was a mistake at the time. Read the signing thread and then tell me how many were against it and thought it was a mistake.

Where is that thread i was looking for it earlier.

http://www.heroesandvillains.info/forumv3/index.php?topic=39825.0

Thank you.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75699
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #586 on: December 22, 2013, 03:53:32 AM »
I have no problem with us completing a deal that was 95% done at the time the manager threw his toys out the pram and went off in a strop. For all we know KMac and other coaches could have said to the board we should complete the deal.

If Ireland had been the player you thought he would be would it still be a mistake? Virtually no one said it was a mistake until they realised he was going to be crap for us.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75699
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #587 on: December 22, 2013, 03:57:35 AM »
Missing the point yet again. It's a mistake because hindsight shows he was shit for us. Virtually no one thought it was a mistake at the time. Read the signing thread and then tell me how many were against it and thought it was a mistake.

Where is that thread i was looking for it earlier.

http://www.heroesandvillains.info/forumv3/index.php?topic=39825.0

Yep, we were all completely conned by the fucking waster.

Rich nailed it at the time, "the new Sasa Curcic" both players had the ability to be big players for us, we very rarely saw it though and it is relief all round when they are no longer Villa players.

Offline eastie

  • Member
  • Posts: 19940
  • Age: 59
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #588 on: December 22, 2013, 03:58:25 AM »
I have no problem with us completing a deal that was 95% done at the time the manager threw his toys out the pram and went off in a strop. For all we know KMac and other coaches could have said to the board we should complete the deal.

If Ireland had been the player you thought he would be would it still be a mistake? Virtually no one said it was a mistake until they realised he was going to be crap for us.

If we had got half out of him that he showed at city then he would have been a revelation so he wouldn't have been a mistake .

It seems he and houllier were never suited to each other though and things went downhill from there - its a shame we never got the best from him as he's the kind of player we have lacked for years.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75699
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #589 on: December 22, 2013, 04:02:11 AM »
Anyway, back to my filum. Goodnight, evening, morning etc wherever you are.

Offline eastie

  • Member
  • Posts: 19940
  • Age: 59
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #590 on: December 22, 2013, 04:03:20 AM »
Anyway, back to my filum. Goodnight, evening, morning etc wherever you are.

Yes back to bed - goodnight and enjoy your film pws.

Online brontebilly

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11039
  • GM : 23.06.2026
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #591 on: December 22, 2013, 05:27:05 AM »
I have no problem with us completing a deal that was 95% done at the time the manager threw his toys out the pram and went off in a strop. For all we know KMac and other coaches could have said to the board we should complete the deal.

If Ireland had been the player you thought he would be would it still be a mistake? Virtually no one said it was a mistake until they realised he was going to be crap for us.

Buying a player without a manager in place was asking for trouble.  despite what Krulak and his army of sycophants on here were saying at the time. Still if we had sold him after his player of the year season probably would have got 4m or so for him.

Considering our money troubles it really hasn't helped having the likes of Dunne, Hutton, Warnock, Ireland, Bent running down their contracts to a point where we will get nothing for them. Seems like he is taking the same approach with Nzogbia. I think that is self defeating to be honest and the bomb squad antics last summer were immature really.

Malandro

  • Guest
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #592 on: December 22, 2013, 07:28:04 PM »
nothing to be smug about, but I did ask the General a few times who was buying Ireland.


Offline eastie

  • Member
  • Posts: 19940
  • Age: 59
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #593 on: December 22, 2013, 08:09:53 PM »
nothing to be smug about, but I did ask the General a few times who was buying Ireland.



Were you referred to nicola Keye ?

Online eamonn

  • Member
  • Posts: 33692
  • Location: Stay in sight of the mainland
  • GM : 26.07.2020
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #594 on: December 23, 2013, 03:42:22 AM »
The alarm bells should have rung when Houlier quickly sussed him out. Ireland had/has the technical prowess that GHou would surely have relished and yet he singled him out for not trying hard enough within weeks of taking charge.

As an aside, has Houllier said much about his time at the club in interviews since he had to leave the post? Given his oft-outspoken nature it would be interesting to hear about the squad-staff fight and the attitude he faced from the MON players in his brief reign.

Offline Merv

  • Member
  • Posts: 4192
  • Location: Undercover
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #595 on: December 23, 2013, 07:06:08 AM »
I thought he was a good signing at the time. Felt Milner's industry would be covered by Petrov, NRC & Sidwell, and Ireland would bring the flair. Got it wrong.

However well he does for Stoke, I won't feel regret he's left us. He was close to anonymous for three years. He has already commented that he's playing for his future with his contract up in the summer. That's his motivation this season.

Offline mike

  • Member
  • Posts: 2356
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #596 on: December 23, 2013, 07:19:07 AM »
.despite what Krulak and his army of sycophants on here were saying at the time.


 despite what Krulak and his army of sycophants on here were saying at the time.
[/quote]

It used to really nark me how everyone had to call him sir and there were pages of recriminations one time when someone refused to do so.

Offline Ads

  • Member
  • Posts: 42816
  • Location: The Breeze
  • GM : 17.04.2024
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #597 on: December 23, 2013, 09:06:04 AM »
I hate respect in society. I was saying the other day, if there is one thing we need less of, its people showing respect.

Offline Mister E

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18073
  • Location: Mostly the Republic of Yorkshire (N)
  • GM : 16.02.2026
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #598 on: December 23, 2013, 09:15:58 AM »


However well he does for Stoke, I won't feel regret he's left us.
And Stoke are playing him very differently: he is supporting the striker there (as Charlie Adam did when he came on against us), with a free role. I never felt we really used him properly ....


... not that I like him - IMO, he represents all that's bad about P'ship football.

Offline eastie

  • Member
  • Posts: 19940
  • Age: 59
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #599 on: December 23, 2013, 09:16:57 AM »
.despite what Krulak and his army of sycophants on here were saying at the time.


 despite what Krulak and his army of sycophants on here were saying at the time.

It used to really nark me how everyone had to call him sir and there were pages of recriminations one time when someone refused to do so.
[/quote]

I never called him sir and can't recollect that at all - I thought he seemed ok to approach - who called him sir?

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal