Can we call Edwards as better than Bolt, he's held the WR for 17 years now.
Exactly. If Risso's points were valid there would be a host of players from the same era with similar averages.
Nonsense, or other players from that era would have been better than half as good as him.
Quote from: Percy McCarthy on August 10, 2012, 08:48:09 PMExactly. If Risso's points were valid there would be a host of players from the same era with similar averages.Nonsense. He was playing for the best team in the world, in an era when there were three or four other test playing countries. He was easily the best player in the best team, who went around battering countries like South Africa and India. Cricket isn't exactly a world sport these days, but it was hardly played by anybody at all back then.
Quote from: Percy McCarthy on August 10, 2012, 11:13:06 PMNonsense, or other players from that era would have been better than half as good as him. It really isn't saying very much. Four test playing countries with 6 batsmen each at any one time. He was the best batsman at a time when hardly anybody played cricket. Big deal, in the list of greatest sportsmen ever, he wouldn't be in my top 50.
Quote from: Rissbert on August 10, 2012, 11:41:10 PMQuote from: Percy McCarthy on August 10, 2012, 11:13:06 PMNonsense, or other players from that era would have been better than half as good as him. It really isn't saying very much. Four test playing countries with 6 batsmen each at any one time. He was the best batsman at a time when hardly anybody played cricket. Big deal, in the list of greatest sportsmen ever, he wouldn't be in my top 50.I honestly think that saying Messi wouldn't be in your top fifty Barcelona players would be a less ridiculous remark.In my list of greatest sportsmen ever, there isn't a list, just a definitive answer.
Never played on the sub-continent? So what? You just said India were crap.He played on much worse pitches than today's with much worse equipment and training, against bowlers who were not much different from today's.And please try to understand before one of us dies - if it was so much easier everybody else from that era would be nearer to his record, instead of matching fairly consistently the all-eras average.Now, the rest of you carry on your debate for second place on the list.
Cricket in those days was not far removed from the Oxford/University boat race, it was just basically England and Australia playing each other all the time. He'd obviously worked out exactly how to play the England bowlers, until the bodyline series. You can't argue with his record compared to everybody else at the time, but hardly anybody else did play cricket, apart from a few English toffs. He never played a series in the Indian sub-continent for example, with all the different conditions that that generates.