It was a stonewall penalty. His arm was way out, and he gained advantage from it, as Villa player behind him. There was plenty of room front of him to avoid. Being silly doesn't excuse the player.But we would have missed.
Trouble is these days that "ball to hand" is given.Hand ball is supposed to be deliberate, but .... His arm was out there to stop the ball.
4-0 Wigan
Quote from: Summers on April 28, 2012, 03:45:37 PMQuote from: Apyadg on April 28, 2012, 03:43:33 PMHe's turning away from the ball expecting the player in front of him to volley it. Would have been incredibly harsh to give a penalty for that, no intent.It was a penalty. His HAND changes the path of the ball. It's a penalty. Was it deliberate? That's kind of a big part of whether it should be given as handball or not.It come from quite a distance away, but he's clearly expecting the useless twat in front of him to clear it and is starting to turn to run up the pitch.It's one of that you sometimes see given, but people would be furious if that was given against us.
Quote from: Apyadg on April 28, 2012, 03:43:33 PMHe's turning away from the ball expecting the player in front of him to volley it. Would have been incredibly harsh to give a penalty for that, no intent.It was a penalty. His HAND changes the path of the ball. It's a penalty.
He's turning away from the ball expecting the player in front of him to volley it. Would have been incredibly harsh to give a penalty for that, no intent.