collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by pauliewalnuts
[Today at 05:25:06 PM]


The International Cricket Thread by olaftab
[Today at 05:24:36 PM]


FFP by kippaxvilla2
[Today at 05:23:30 PM]


Kits 25/26 by VILLA MOLE
[Today at 05:11:42 PM]


International Rugby by UK Redsox
[Today at 04:27:48 PM]


Pre season 2025 by ChicagoLion
[Today at 03:54:07 PM]


Yasin Ozcan (now out on loan at Anderlecht) by Somniloquism
[Today at 01:41:10 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by VILLA MOLE
[Today at 11:18:27 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Who do you want as the next manager? New poll option.  (Read 1525942 times)

Online Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29165
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Who do you want as the next manager? New poll option.
« Reply #4770 on: May 21, 2012, 04:27:43 PM »
Another point: just checked the stats, and Norwich finished top of the long-balls per game league, and twelfth in the short-passes league. They scored the seventh highest number of goals from open play, which sounds impressive, except that they came seventh in crosses per game and sixteenth in number of through balls. They came fifth in breakaway goals, but fourth in set piece goals, scoring more set pieces at home and more counter attacks away, though generally scoring fewer at home. Is this starting to sound familiar?

Incidentally, we finished fifth-bottom of the long-balls league, but third-bottom of the short-passes league as well, which shows how much of the ball we had. Shower of shit.
« Last Edit: May 21, 2012, 04:30:35 PM by Mønty »

Offline tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15409
Re: Who do you want as the next manager? New poll option.
« Reply #4771 on: May 21, 2012, 04:37:56 PM »
Another point: just checked the stats, and Norwich finished top of the long-balls per game league, and twelfth in the short-passes league. They scored the seventh highest number of goals from open play, which sounds impressive, except that they came seventh in crosses per game and sixteenth in number of through balls. They came fifth in breakaway goals, but fourth in set piece goals, scoring more set pieces at home and more counter attacks away, though generally scoring fewer at home. Is this starting to sound familiar?

Incidentally, we finished fifth-bottom of the long-balls league, but third-bottom of the short-passes league as well, which shows how much of the ball we had. Shower of shit.

Where did we finish in the "play balls straight in to touch" league?

Online Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29165
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Who do you want as the next manager? New poll option.
« Reply #4772 on: May 21, 2012, 04:38:33 PM »
Another point: just checked the stats, and Norwich finished top of the long-balls per game league, and twelfth in the short-passes league. They scored the seventh highest number of goals from open play, which sounds impressive, except that they came seventh in crosses per game and sixteenth in number of through balls. They came fifth in breakaway goals, but fourth in set piece goals, scoring more set pieces at home and more counter attacks away, though generally scoring fewer at home. Is this starting to sound familiar?

Incidentally, we finished fifth-bottom of the long-balls league, but third-bottom of the short-passes league as well, which shows how much of the ball we had. Shower of shit.

Where did we finish in the "play balls straight in to touch" league?

I imagine we stormed to the title.

Offline tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15409
Re: Who do you want as the next manager? New poll option.
« Reply #4773 on: May 21, 2012, 04:44:32 PM »
Another point: just checked the stats, and Norwich finished top of the long-balls per game league, and twelfth in the short-passes league. They scored the seventh highest number of goals from open play, which sounds impressive, except that they came seventh in crosses per game and sixteenth in number of through balls. They came fifth in breakaway goals, but fourth in set piece goals, scoring more set pieces at home and more counter attacks away, though generally scoring fewer at home. Is this starting to sound familiar?

Incidentally, we finished fifth-bottom of the long-balls league, but third-bottom of the short-passes league as well, which shows how much of the ball we had. Shower of shit.

Where did we finish in the "play balls straight in to touch" league?

I imagine we stormed to the title.

With Hutton and Warnock sharing the Player of the Year honour.

Online Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29165
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Who do you want as the next manager? New poll option.
« Reply #4774 on: May 21, 2012, 05:02:47 PM »
In all seriousness, don't discount the role of N'Zogbia in our minimal passes rate. His blind alley running was crucial in our quests to give the ball away.

Offline Ad@m

  • Member
  • Posts: 12563
  • GM : 23.03.2023
Re: Who do you want as the next manager? New poll option.
« Reply #4775 on: May 21, 2012, 06:24:46 PM »
Well OGS is still the odds-on favourite with all the bookies, and his odds are generally shortening whilst Lamberts are drifting.

Offline sonlyme

  • Member
  • Posts: 349
  • Location: West Midlands
Re: Who do you want as the next manager? New poll option.
« Reply #4776 on: May 21, 2012, 06:54:51 PM »
The numbers don't lie.

Lambert's Norwich thrived on a pragmatic hustle and bustle direct form of football.  He is a safer choice without doubt - but comparisons with O'Neill are anything but facile.  He is another form of Allardyce - which some of you may not think a bad thing.  But it is a philosophy of football that relies on 'buying' performers - not developing them.



OGS has one clear advantage to my mind - he worked as a youth and reserve coach first - and was a winner at it.  He is a better fit with what the Villa are trying to do in these Financial Fair Play times.  He coaches fast passing and movement and encourages his team to mix it up and not be afraid to shoot.  Some of the stuff Molde are playing puts me in mind of Swansea - who - let us not forget - made McLeish's Villa look like a pub team at Villa Park.

Norwich cut their cloth according to their pocket - but Villa have a much better pool of quality than Norwich - and we have been down the direct and physical route before - and we achieved nothing except league respectability.  In a season that saw four managers in charge - we managed 9th in the league - Norwich's wonder season sees them 12th. 

Here is an excerpt from an article about their long ball game...


Whilst they don’t enjoy anywhere near the same levels of possession as Swansea, who are also adapting to life in the Premier League with great success, Norwich have proven to be a potent attacking force this season. It should be noted that of the sides 32 goals 12 have come from set-pieces, more than any other side. But they still have 17 from open play, which ranks them as 8th, higher than Liverpool.

Lambert’s tactics

Much of Norwich’s success is as noted down to tactics, specifically the fact that they employ a direct style of play that has surprisingly  seen them play more long balls than any other side in the Premier League. Their emphasis on long balls plays to their strengths as Grant Holt and Morrison are able to hold the ball up upfront and bring midfield players such as Pilkington into play, which has seen the two forwards contribute 6 assists between them as well as 15 goals.

This direct style of play, whilst not appreciated by all, is clearly playing dividends for Norwich.


Source: http://thinkfootball.co.uk/norwichs-direct-style-of-play-is-paying-dividends/


Here is the philosophy from the mouth of one of their players.

“Sometimes it doesn’t matter how far someone runs or how many passes they complete, it’s about getting the result,” bragged Canaries centre-back Elliott Ward.

“Yes, Swansea pass the ball well, but we pressed them that high they did not know what to do. I don’t think they’ve come up against that or our physical game too many times before.

“We got stuck in, we pressed them and we were physical.”

It may not have always been pretty, but Norwich were pretty effective.


Source: http://www.walesonline.co.uk/footballnation/football-news/2012/02/13/analysis-norwich-city-shut-down-swansea-city-s-pass-masters-again-91466-30317096/

I want to see a manager at Villa who is

1 - A winner.
2 - Has a clear footballing philosophy.
3 - Has experience of working with youth and developing players.
4 - Commands the respect of the people within the game.

For me - OGS - RM - and BR could fit better with our excellent Academy and Reserve set ups.

Lambert might fit - or he might not.  And I am not saying he is a poor manager.  But I am saying that there could be a better fit out there with who and what we are. 
« Last Edit: May 21, 2012, 07:10:07 PM by sonlyme »

Offline AV82EC

  • Member
  • Posts: 12283
  • Location: Macclesfield
  • GM : 22.02.2024
Re: Who do you want as the next manager? New poll option.
« Reply #4777 on: May 21, 2012, 07:31:00 PM »
The numbers don't lie.

Lambert's Norwich thrived on a pragmatic hustle and bustle direct form of football.  He is a safer choice without doubt - but comparisons with O'Neill are anything but facile.  He is another form of Allardyce - which some of you may not think a bad thing.  But it is a philosophy of football that relies on 'buying' performers - not developing them.



OGS has one clear advantage to my mind - he worked as a youth and reserve coach first - and was a winner at it.  He is a better fit with what the Villa are trying to do in these Financial Fair Play times.  He coaches fast passing and movement and encourages his team to mix it up and not be afraid to shoot.  Some of the stuff Molde are playing puts me in mind of Swansea - who - let us not forget - made McLeish's Villa look like a pub team at Villa Park.

Norwich cut their cloth according to their pocket - but Villa have a much better pool of quality than Norwich - and we have been down the direct and physical route before - and we achieved nothing except league respectability.  In a season that saw four managers in charge - we managed 9th in the league - Norwich's wonder season sees them 12th. 

Here is an excerpt from an article about their long ball game...


Whilst they don’t enjoy anywhere near the same levels of possession as Swansea, who are also adapting to life in the Premier League with great success, Norwich have proven to be a potent attacking force this season. It should be noted that of the sides 32 goals 12 have come from set-pieces, more than any other side. But they still have 17 from open play, which ranks them as 8th, higher than Liverpool.

Lambert’s tactics

Much of Norwich’s success is as noted down to tactics, specifically the fact that they employ a direct style of play that has surprisingly  seen them play more long balls than any other side in the Premier League. Their emphasis on long balls plays to their strengths as Grant Holt and Morrison are able to hold the ball up upfront and bring midfield players such as Pilkington into play, which has seen the two forwards contribute 6 assists between them as well as 15 goals.

This direct style of play, whilst not appreciated by all, is clearly playing dividends for Norwich.


Source: http://thinkfootball.co.uk/norwichs-direct-style-of-play-is-paying-dividends/


Here is the philosophy from the mouth of one of their players.

“Sometimes it doesn’t matter how far someone runs or how many passes they complete, it’s about getting the result,” bragged Canaries centre-back Elliott Ward.

“Yes, Swansea pass the ball well, but we pressed them that high they did not know what to do. I don’t think they’ve come up against that or our physical game too many times before.

“We got stuck in, we pressed them and we were physical.”

It may not have always been pretty, but Norwich were pretty effective.


Source: http://www.walesonline.co.uk/footballnation/football-news/2012/02/13/analysis-norwich-city-shut-down-swansea-city-s-pass-masters-again-91466-30317096/

I want to see a manager at Villa who is

1 - A winner.
2 - Has a clear footballing philosophy.
3 - Has experience of working with youth and developing players.
4 - Commands the respect of the people within the game.

For me - OGS - RM - and BR could fit better with our excellent Academy and Reserve set ups.

Lambert might fit - or he might not.  And I am not saying he is a poor manager.  But I am saying that there could be a better fit out there with who and what we are. 

This.  I've been umming and ahhing about Lambert and I'm now convinced he's not for us.  Not that I'm that certain on who we should have?!

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 35580
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: Who do you want as the next manager? New poll option.
« Reply #4778 on: May 21, 2012, 08:02:59 PM »
If the article was posted to prove Swansea's football is better than Norwich's, it begs the question: who won?

Offline Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 41402
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: Who do you want as the next manager? New poll option.
« Reply #4779 on: May 21, 2012, 08:52:00 PM »
Quote
OGS has one clear advantage to my mind - he worked as a youth and reserve coach first - and was a winner at it.

So Kevin MacDonald it is.

Offline sonlyme

  • Member
  • Posts: 349
  • Location: West Midlands
Re: Who do you want as the next manager? New poll option.
« Reply #4780 on: May 21, 2012, 08:53:46 PM »
If the article was posted to prove Swansea's football is better than Norwich's, it begs the question: who won?

I think the selected quotes make it clear that Norwich won - but well done you.  Using the logic of results - Sam Allardyce is the man we really want - cos his team beat Blackpool - how and why is beyond me - but they did and if results is results - why aren't we talking to him?

Or what about Roberto Di Matteo? His team have just lifted old big ears and studiously avoided playing football throughout - a wins a win?

We all want results. 

But wouldn't it be nice to also want football - and let the results come after?

Online Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29165
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Who do you want as the next manager? New poll option.
« Reply #4781 on: May 21, 2012, 09:07:32 PM »
I completely agree Sonlyme. It's about the right man for the job. I actually think Lambert would be a good appointment for Liverpool, Everton, Spurs or even Arsenal, for various reasons relating to either maximising what they have there, or taking players used to possession football and working more rounded elements into their game. What we have is a group of players, especially the youngsters, who would be good at possession football but have barely been taught it at a senior level. OGS offers that, Rodgers offers that, even Martinez offers that, but Lambert doesn't.

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 35580
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: Who do you want as the next manager? New poll option.
« Reply #4782 on: May 21, 2012, 09:52:19 PM »
Don't get me wrong, I want OGS too. Just seemed a funny way of stating the case, bringing up a game where the manager you were seeking to deride was the winner.

And sonlyme, please don't talk to me like I'm a ******

Offline Phil from the upper holte

  • Member
  • Posts: 10142
  • Location: B62
Re: Who do you want as the next manager? New poll option.
« Reply #4783 on: May 21, 2012, 10:23:42 PM »
Not only that lambert and Mon look like they were separated at birth

Offline silhillvilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 12681
  • GM : Dec, 2014
Re: Who do you want as the next manager? New poll option.
« Reply #4784 on: May 21, 2012, 10:34:13 PM »
FWIW here's my realistic top 3
1. Klinsmann
2. OGS
3. Tbc

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal