When it opened, they ran a ridiculous season ticket lottery scheme for matchdays, then in subsequent seasons allowed only season ticket holders who even had to pay to get in. Why didn't they let more people in from the off to build up a customer base, thus encouraging them to come back and telling their friends and family that it might be a nice place to have a Sunday lunch or a midweek meal? The place always looks as if it's closed, even on a matchday.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on September 14, 2011, 10:37:05 PMNot really, for a company which turns over nigh on 100 million pounds a year.Most of which goes straight out in player wages. if you take that & transfer fees out of the equation, football clubs are not big businesses.
Not really, for a company which turns over nigh on 100 million pounds a year.
Matchdays aren't really the problem though, it's the rest of the week. The museum is the only viable idea and even that has it's risks, but at least with kids and schools visiting on non matchdays etc., the building is in use.
My point is, that they had oodles of money to spend to set it up, but the ongoing plan was shit.
There's sometimes more to the success of a pub than the location. A pub that is focussed on and caters for it's target market can still be successful, like any good business. Location obviously is important, but a pub like the Holte that had a complete renovation and makeover with the backing of a multi million pound football club could have got it right. After all, you wouldn't necessarily choose to travel to the Handsworth/Winson Green border for a night out, but enough people continue to do so to make the Black Horse a success. My point is, that they had oodles of money to spend to set it up, but the ongoing plan was shit.
Oh thats a real shame I watched many Villa away games In their and had a couple of great Birthday parties! plus if you did the villa tour it was a nice place place to finish!I think this is just the start of the decline it was promising when it started and im grateful for whats been done but I get the feeling learner wished he had never took it on now.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on September 14, 2011, 10:38:38 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on September 14, 2011, 10:37:05 PMNot really, for a company which turns over nigh on 100 million pounds a year.Most of which goes straight out in player wages. if you take that & transfer fees out of the equation, football clubs are not big businesses. That's like saying this of Tesco's: if you ignore the food they sell, it would be a small business.
Quote from: Californian Villain on September 14, 2011, 10:58:56 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on September 14, 2011, 10:38:38 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on September 14, 2011, 10:37:05 PMNot really, for a company which turns over nigh on 100 million pounds a year.Most of which goes straight out in player wages. if you take that & transfer fees out of the equation, football clubs are not big businesses. That's like saying this of Tesco's: if you ignore the food they sell, it would be a small business.Not quite. I can see the point Dave is making. You can almost separate out Sky money in-Players wages out as a independant entity.All Aston Villa plc does is manage and organise their appearances, and arrange for spectators to attend.Even if you consider total turnover, this equates Aston Villa plc with at best a medium sized manufacturing company, and probably smaller than a few metal bashing factories in the Black Country.