Everyone said Chelsea would dominate when Abramovic came in, they signed world class players at the time too, but in 8 years they've won 3 league titles and got to 1 Champions League final.Man City have undoubtedly made it harder, but it's not impossible.We just need a long term strategy and to stick to it. If it's selling high and buying low then so be it, it's worked for so many clubs across Europe (Spurs, Lyon, Porto, Sevilla).Winning the league might not be possible in the next 7 or 8 years, but top 4 certainly is. Take away the mans credentials as a manager, but In MON's last season we got 64 points.Arsenal finished fourth with 68 last season.Spurs got it with 70 in 2009/10Arsenal with (as we know) 72 in 2008/09So an average of 70. We hit 60, 62 and 64 under MON I believe.A Modric instead of a Sidwell, a VDV instead of an Ireland, a Gallas instead of a Collins or, as we all knew at the time, a Bent instead of a Heskey would have got us even closer.It's difficult, but any manager worth his salt should be able to get this club around the 60 point mark with some backing from the board after a couple of years. Then he's just got to get a bit of luck to take us that bit further. It's certainly doable.
I think Sky, even the Premier League, perhaps even UEFA and FIFA wouldn't mind if all football was watched on TV, with empty stadiums. That's where the big chunk of money is. It would be the same if film producers found that DVDs and the internet make the most money, so stop releasing films at the cinema.
Quote from: Meanwood Villa on September 09, 2011, 01:01:30 PMQuote from: NeilH on September 09, 2011, 12:36:55 PMThat's about the top and bottom of it really. In a few years, when the Prem is utterly dominated by three uber rich teams, I'll be intrigued to see how Sky market it.They'll market it by saying "look how great it is to see the 3 uber rich teams destroy their opponents" Not too different from nowMuch of their target audience support one of the three clubs. Too many others will watch any football that's on.
Quote from: NeilH on September 09, 2011, 12:36:55 PMThat's about the top and bottom of it really. In a few years, when the Prem is utterly dominated by three uber rich teams, I'll be intrigued to see how Sky market it.They'll market it by saying "look how great it is to see the 3 uber rich teams destroy their opponents" Not too different from now
That's about the top and bottom of it really. In a few years, when the Prem is utterly dominated by three uber rich teams, I'll be intrigued to see how Sky market it.
Quote from: Vanilla on September 09, 2011, 01:07:23 PMI think Sky, even the Premier League, perhaps even UEFA and FIFA wouldn't mind if all football was watched on TV, with empty stadiums. That's where the big chunk of money is. It would be the same if film producers found that DVDs and the internet make the most money, so stop releasing films at the cinema. No, they hate empty grounds - how can they hype a game up when it's being played in front of banks of empty seats? They used to (and maybe still do) call Wigan v Fulham-type Monday night fixtures 'Black Mondays'.
Spurs, I think, are realising that qualifying for the CL once is not enough, you have got to do it nigh-on year in, year out.I think the situation we have now is that Liverpool have been on the slide for a while (revenues, small stadium, not in the CL) and are currently having one big roll of the dice to claw back what they've lost.Spurs aren't going to be making the kind of investment necessary to buy year in, year out CL football.Arsenal are really feeling the fact that there's a financial gulf between themselves and the top echelon of the English game.I thikn we will have a scenario where Man United, Man City and Chelsea basically share the league titles, and this will go on until someone comes along and makes a vast investment in a club (and given that this has only ever happened in this country twice, it probably won't happen for a long time), or the rules change massively.Effectively, we are getting a situation very similar to the Spanish league, where two clubs share all the silverware, and there's a massive gulf to the rest, except in our case it'll be three clubs.
I think the fact that the England squad the other night, you could say had roughly £100 million worth of ex-Villa players in midfield. Players who we had to sell in their prime, says a lot. Yes you could say they didn't want to stay, so why keep them, but the fact they didn't want to stay, or the fact we couldn't encourage them to, also says something.