Yes, absolutely, he should carry on and post what he likes.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on May 08, 2024, 11:08:18 PMYes, absolutely, he should carry on and post what he likes.Don't you post what you like?
Quote from: Chris Harte on May 08, 2024, 11:09:51 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on May 08, 2024, 11:08:18 PMYes, absolutely, he should carry on and post what he likes.Don't you post what you like?Yes, I do. And so should he.And when i post rubbish, I expect people to tell me I'm posting rubbish.
Quote from: Footy-Vill on May 08, 2024, 08:58:32 PMBy all accounts they are fully deserving but yes I must not get so bother about things here and there.Something I look forward to improving next seasonYou really should give Villatalk a go, they positively frown on topics going off the subject over there, and profanity isn't allowed either. You'd love it.
By all accounts they are fully deserving but yes I must not get so bother about things here and there.Something I look forward to improving next season
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on May 08, 2024, 11:12:09 PMQuote from: Chris Harte on May 08, 2024, 11:09:51 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on May 08, 2024, 11:08:18 PMYes, absolutely, he should carry on and post what he likes.Don't you post what you like?Yes, I do. And so should he.And when i post rubbish, I expect people to tell me I'm posting rubbish.Well they said Gabby and Grealish had greater accomplishments than Warnock at Villa. While Gabby blotted his copybook in the end and everyone/many have got the arsehole with Grealish, I'd say Warnock's achievements were the lesser of the three, although this is all subjective.Yet your response was to describe it as anally expelled obvious nonsense.
Though I'm not sure what Villatalk entails I'd prefer to stay here.
Quote from: Footy-Vill on May 08, 2024, 11:20:58 PMThough I'm not sure what Villatalk entails I'd prefer to stay here.Sense at last. Unless you like red ink.
It's so fucking endless, and it's clearly posted to create exactly the sort of reaction that, ultimately, he (they) end up getting. It's just so obvious.Either:1. It's a bot, a collective of people on a wind up, a trolling exercise, something like that, in which case, well, what are you supposed to do? How are you supposed to react to obvious trolling?2. It isn't the above, it's a genuine poster, in which case, why not treat him (or they) exactly like you would any other poster? If - randomly selected poster - Bad English, someone who has put in the years here, a recognised regular, started posting what FV does, he'd get *exactly* the same response.So, basically, either it's a wind up, in which case, it reaps what it sews, or it's genuinely a regular poster who believes this stuff, in which case, they can expect to be treated like any other rational poster who posted endless utter rubbish clearly designed to wind people up.And it's far from just this thread. See, as an example, recent utter rubbish about Morgan Rogers.
Yes I donated in good faith as contribution to site! And if it's ok can we not speculate things on my private situation.Anyway I can't be alone in getting confused seeing Stephen Warnock at the top of the main user board and that was why I asked my question. Can we go on topic again because its my worst thing reading non topic when the aim of any thread is to get to discuss subject.Up The Villa!!