Andy Caroll more rounded?! He's basically Mark Hateley. Even my scouse mate concedes you got well and truly ripped off
Quote from: gregnash on June 08, 2011, 05:44:28 PMAndy Caroll more rounded?! He's basically Mark Hateley. Even my scouse mate concedes you got well and truly ripped offDarren Bent: 17 goals and 2 assists in 36 appearances.Andy Carroll: 13 goals and 6 assists in 26 appearances.
Quote from: The Left Side on June 08, 2011, 04:54:23 PMAs mentioned earlier I think a percantage of the transfer fee will go to Watford, what percentage I don't know!think its 15% but i've seen 25% mentioned! Whoever wrote that one in deserves a kicking.
As mentioned earlier I think a percantage of the transfer fee will go to Watford, what percentage I don't know!
Quote from: Redman on June 08, 2011, 05:49:49 PMQuote from: gregnash on June 08, 2011, 05:44:28 PMAndy Caroll more rounded?! He's basically Mark Hateley. Even my scouse mate concedes you got well and truly ripped offDarren Bent: 17 goals and 2 assists in 36 appearances.Andy Carroll: 13 goals and 6 assists in 26 appearances.and for our respective clubs?
Quote from: gregnash on June 08, 2011, 05:28:02 PMQuote from: The Left Side on June 08, 2011, 04:54:23 PMAs mentioned earlier I think a percantage of the transfer fee will go to Watford, what percentage I don't know!think its 15% but i've seen 25% mentioned! Whoever wrote that one in deserves a kicking.We paid £8m for him that rose to £9.65m with the add-ons. Not sure Watford get any percentage of sale.
Quote from: hartman_1982 on June 08, 2011, 05:51:08 PMQuote from: Redman on June 08, 2011, 05:49:49 PMQuote from: gregnash on June 08, 2011, 05:44:28 PMAndy Caroll more rounded?! He's basically Mark Hateley. Even my scouse mate concedes you got well and truly ripped offDarren Bent: 17 goals and 2 assists in 36 appearances.Andy Carroll: 13 goals and 6 assists in 26 appearances.and for our respective clubs?I don't know but clearly Bent has done better. But then he was fully fit the whole season.The point is, determining the value of a striker isn't as simple as dividing the transfer fee by the number of goals.
Quote from: Redman on June 08, 2011, 05:55:20 PMQuote from: hartman_1982 on June 08, 2011, 05:51:08 PMQuote from: Redman on June 08, 2011, 05:49:49 PMQuote from: gregnash on June 08, 2011, 05:44:28 PMAndy Caroll more rounded?! He's basically Mark Hateley. Even my scouse mate concedes you got well and truly ripped offDarren Bent: 17 goals and 2 assists in 36 appearances.Andy Carroll: 13 goals and 6 assists in 26 appearances.and for our respective clubs?I don't know but clearly Bent has done better. But then he was fully fit the whole season.The point is, determining the value of a striker isn't as simple as dividing the transfer fee by the number of goals.depends what you want i guess. Rush wasn't much more than a goalscorer but he fired you to god knows how many titles.
It will be interesting to see if the move to Liverpool solves Carroll's 'off-field' problems.
Andy Carroll cost £35m and earns £85,000 a week I think. I doubt he'll ever be as prolific as Bent but he is more well-rounded and will earn his salary every week with his hold-up play, lay-offs and knock-downs.
Quote from: Redman on June 08, 2011, 05:39:31 PMAndy Carroll cost £35m and earns £85,000 a week I think. I doubt he'll ever be as prolific as Bent but he is more well-rounded and will earn his salary every week with his hold-up play, lay-offs and knock-downs.More well-rounded? In what respect? He looks a bit one dimensional and strikes me as a bit of a moron judging by his court appearances and assaulting team mates. Granted he probably appears well rounded compared to Joey Barton but he strikes me as a ponytailed Duncan Ferguson.
Darren Bent: 17 goals and 2 assists in 36 appearances.Andy Carroll: 13 goals and 6 assists in 26 appearances.