The long lost art of the thunderous tackle, marvellous, I think I had a little sex wee.
And the fact no attempt whatsoever was made to see if his opponent was still alive.
Quote from: dave shelley on December 08, 2014, 04:04:20 PMQuote from: BoskoDjembaSalifou on December 08, 2014, 02:21:30 PMYou all seem to be saying it was a good tackle, but what if Benteke was on the receiving end? Would you just dismiss it as an occupational hazard even though there wasn't any need for a tackle like that?I know I wouldn't!With respect to your opinion, having refereed at most levels for over twenty odd years; I like to think I'm qualified to say that I think I've seen most things regarding the art of tackling and I've seen some beauts. That was the perfect execution of a sliding tackle you could ever wish to see. Clark's feet did not leave the ground until he was within playing distance of the ball, perfectly legal. Next he made full contact with the ball 100%. Given the speed that Clark was travelling when he made contact with the ball; to expect him to stop instantly to avoid colliding with the opponent would be a) impossible and b) to place himself at risk of serious muscular injury if he tried to do so.On your point of being angry if Benteke had been tackled like that, my answer would be no, not at all, it is more than likely to happen more than once. If he's injured due to a fair challenge then, I reiterate, occupational hazard. There are very few things in this world I know much about but what I do know is, how to referee a football match and the difference between a hard, fair challenge and a foul. I wouldn't have reached the standard I did if I couldn't do that.Fair enough.I wasn't suggesting it was a red card or anything as he did get the ball, but I felt it was too aggressive. I'd prefer our centre backs not to go to ground unless they really had to.
Quote from: BoskoDjembaSalifou on December 08, 2014, 02:21:30 PMYou all seem to be saying it was a good tackle, but what if Benteke was on the receiving end? Would you just dismiss it as an occupational hazard even though there wasn't any need for a tackle like that?I know I wouldn't!With respect to your opinion, having refereed at most levels for over twenty odd years; I like to think I'm qualified to say that I think I've seen most things regarding the art of tackling and I've seen some beauts. That was the perfect execution of a sliding tackle you could ever wish to see. Clark's feet did not leave the ground until he was within playing distance of the ball, perfectly legal. Next he made full contact with the ball 100%. Given the speed that Clark was travelling when he made contact with the ball; to expect him to stop instantly to avoid colliding with the opponent would be a) impossible and b) to place himself at risk of serious muscular injury if he tried to do so.On your point of being angry if Benteke had been tackled like that, my answer would be no, not at all, it is more than likely to happen more than once. If he's injured due to a fair challenge then, I reiterate, occupational hazard. There are very few things in this world I know much about but what I do know is, how to referee a football match and the difference between a hard, fair challenge and a foul. I wouldn't have reached the standard I did if I couldn't do that.
You all seem to be saying it was a good tackle, but what if Benteke was on the receiving end? Would you just dismiss it as an occupational hazard even though there wasn't any need for a tackle like that?I know I wouldn't!
If Clark had been playing in the 50s to the 70s that would have been a normal full bloodied tackle. Ten a penny in those days.Wouldnt have even been noticed.
Quote from: Jon Crofts on December 08, 2014, 05:31:36 PMThe long lost art of the thunderous tackle, marvellous, I think I had a little sex wee.I enjoyed that as much as a player as I did scoring.[/quotAlmost as good as an interception.....
I thought Clark's tackle was well timed and a bit of a "don't fuck with me" after Ulloa had been putting himself about a bit and trying to bully Clark with a couple of attempts at Shearer-esque challenges.Not nice to see a player get injured, but as one of the biggest complaints about the team in general is that we're too nice, and Clark in particular hasn't been strong enough it was actually nice to see him stand up for himself. And he's definitely been on the weights in the close season, he looks about 50% broader now.Also noticeable how the team as a whole stepped up the tackling for a while after Westwood was injured. A definite "wind your necks in" statement to Leicester, and again nice to see the team sticking up for themselves.
Clark is playing very well, and I am confident that with the return of one between Vlaar, Senderos or Baker, he could even be employed as defensive midfielder should Westwood be injuried.