I heard Lee Dixon speaking the other day about how George Graham would take him, Bould, Adams and Winterburn through what was expected of them positionally in different situations. He did it day-after-day, week-after-week. He said it was mind-numbingly dull, but eventually it became second nature. I suppose that's the difference between having a defence as tight as a gnat's snatch, or one as gaping as Jordan's.
If that is true then who are the ones that are refusing to adapt? If it's Dunne and Collins then why are they playing? If it's Clark and Cuellar then why are they even on the bench? And whoever it is, why did we not just bring in 2 new defenders in January? I have serious doubts about this management and if they are saying that they can't get the players to adapt then they are as piss weak and uninspiring as they seem.
YOu mean simply hoofing it out of play at every opportunity. We conceded enough throws against Stoke without Cuellar hoofing. I love Carlos, but he is not Baresi.
Or, they tried to get a couple of defenders in Jan, it did not come off, they have to get through with Lauren and Hardy until May, don't want to destroy Clark in the centre and have reservations for whatever reason over Cuellar (not commanding enough would be my guess) and the reference is basically saying we will have 2 new centre halves and a new pair of full backs, with a more commanding keeper. As such, we can't work on the camels we have so have resigned ourselves to sorting it pre season. That would be my guess. Houllier had the best defence in the league for seasons at Liverpool, if there is something I am convinced he will sort if he comes back, then it is the defence.