Something to debate:
If we'd beaten Stoke the Sunday after Moscow we would very likely have got into the Champions League and the decision would have been hailed as a master stroke. In that case, might we now accept weakened teams in cup competitions as a necessary evil?
I think we'd have been more likely to qualify for the Champions League but "very likely" is pushing it a bit. I remember those late goals made me feel like we'd blown it, so presumably some of the players might have too, but we'll never know what might have been.
KevinGage has put it very well. Winning teams don't worry about tiredness. What we've seen in the recent past suggests it is better to try and win every game as the benefits of the potential victories, maintaining confidence and belief are more beneficial that resting some legs for 90 minutes.
I have changed my opinion since 2009, when I thought cutting down on fixtures seemed like a good idea as being in the Champions League seemed massively important to me in terms of our continued progress and future success as a club - meaning that while we may forgo a UEFA cup trophy it may give us the ability to consistently challenge for more trophies in the near future. Maybe that sounds daft.
You put it well in another thread, Dave. We gambled and missed. Now we're between a rock and a hard place. What do we do now? It's looks like we don't want to win things.
I say try and win every game, no matter what. That's simple isn't it? No playing weakened sides in cups, it doesn't work out well for us.