Quote from: pauliebentnuts on February 27, 2011, 08:37:42 AMQuote from: eastie on February 27, 2011, 07:21:38 AMWhat month is it until or is it the end of 2010? If until end of last season maybe the milner money would offset the loss a bit.Up til 31/7/2010. Then it covers the end of the Aston Villa deadwood years.The next set of accounts should show a marked improvement.
Quote from: eastie on February 27, 2011, 07:21:38 AMWhat month is it until or is it the end of 2010? If until end of last season maybe the milner money would offset the loss a bit.Up til 31/7/2010.
What month is it until or is it the end of 2010? If until end of last season maybe the milner money would offset the loss a bit.
Can anyone put these ratios into English ?? !!RatiosDate Of Accounts 31/05/10 31/05/09 31/05/08 31/05/07 - Pre-tax profit margin % -41.37 -54.89 -10.01 -7.39 - Current ratio 0.19 0.37 0.37 0.12 - Sales/Net Working Capital -1.85 -2.50 -2.66 -0.85 - Gearing % 485.30 241.20 166.80 171.70 - Equity in % 20.20 30.60 38.90 35.40 - Creditor Days 95.42 82.08 108.16 165.69 - Debtor Days 30.66 30.61 67.12 35.36 - Liquidity/Acid Test 0.17 0.35 0.36 0.12 - Return On Capital Employed % -28.30 -32.28 -6.17 -3.16 - Return On Total Assets Employed % -19.46 -23.48 -4.50 -2 - Current Debt Ratio 2.39 1.25 .90 1.28 - Total Debt Ratio 6.67 3.60 2.33 2.51 - Stock Turnover Ratio % 0.61 0.90 0.67 0.62 - Return on Net Assets Employed % -149.39 -108.11 -15.04 -7.05
88% of turnover on wages. Shocking.
Quote from: Rip Van Bentfletch on March 01, 2011, 02:43:38 PM88% of turnover on wages. Shocking.Yes - and completely explains why Randy was not prepared to back MON until the wage bill was reduced.I predict somewhat of a cull in the summer.
Quote from: usav on March 01, 2011, 02:44:48 PMQuote from: Rip Van Bentfletch on March 01, 2011, 02:43:38 PM88% of turnover on wages. Shocking.Yes - and completely explains why Randy was not prepared to back MON until the wage bill was reduced.I predict somewhat of a cull in the summer.I think you're right usa.
with a 10 second glance at the squad you could knock upwards of 300k a week off the wage bill
Quote from: Rip Van Bentfletch on March 01, 2011, 02:43:38 PM88% of turnover on wages. Shocking.Yes - and completely explains why Randy was not prepared to back MON until the wage bill was reduced.
Quote from: usav on March 01, 2011, 02:44:48 PMQuote from: Rip Van Bentfletch on March 01, 2011, 02:43:38 PM88% of turnover on wages. Shocking.Yes - and completely explains why Randy was not prepared to back MON until the wage bill was reduced.Pretty much.Can anyone really fault that now? Stupid thing is RL is on record as as saying he would make money available - providing the stubborn old goat would offload a few of the high earners not playing, yet he was unwilling/ unable to do so.What would the turnover ratio be now if MON had remained, hadn't shifted players off the books and added to the mess with the likes of Keane and McGeady?