Quote from: olneythelonely on October 14, 2010, 07:00:28 PMQuote from: ktvillan on October 14, 2010, 05:23:09 PMI see the usual pathetic excuses are being rolled out for Young's diving again. Like my one? He didn't dive?That's not an excuse, it's denial. I don think too many independent observers would agree with you.
Quote from: ktvillan on October 14, 2010, 05:23:09 PMI see the usual pathetic excuses are being rolled out for Young's diving again. Like my one? He didn't dive?
I see the usual pathetic excuses are being rolled out for Young's diving again.
Quote from: ktvillan on October 14, 2010, 07:09:28 PMQuote from: olneythelonely on October 14, 2010, 07:00:28 PMQuote from: ktvillan on October 14, 2010, 05:23:09 PMI see the usual pathetic excuses are being rolled out for Young's diving again. Like my one? He didn't dive?That's not an excuse, it's denial. I don think too many independent observers would agree with you.What do you mean by independent observer? I'm always moaning about Young's diving for Villa, but usually only when he dives.I think you need to calm down a little bit.
Quote from: Chris Smith on October 14, 2010, 10:44:29 PMQuote from: ktvillan on October 14, 2010, 09:25:51 PMSo now I'm a little Englander for saying that an Englishman that dives is a diver. Hysterical in both senses of the word.And the ref did sort it out, he booked Young. For diving. It's not hysterical in any sense of the word, that's just you struggling for an argument.Exactly, the ref sorted it out. So why the need for anything else? I'll repeat as you appear to be a little slow on the uptake. I accept that diving is cheating but it is only one of the many forms it takes and it is hypocritical to make more of this type than others. They'll all be dealt with by the ref if spotted and it is only because in this country it is considered to be somehow associated with those pesky foreigners that it gets treated with such scorn.Chris you can rant about "other forms of cheating" as much as you like, I doubt anyone is really interested. The thread is about Young being a diver. Nothing else. He is, you've admitted as much yourself. And a lot of people find it a particularly objectionable form of cheating, not to mention often pointless and self defeating. Get over it.
Quote from: ktvillan on October 14, 2010, 09:25:51 PMSo now I'm a little Englander for saying that an Englishman that dives is a diver. Hysterical in both senses of the word.And the ref did sort it out, he booked Young. For diving. It's not hysterical in any sense of the word, that's just you struggling for an argument.Exactly, the ref sorted it out. So why the need for anything else? I'll repeat as you appear to be a little slow on the uptake. I accept that diving is cheating but it is only one of the many forms it takes and it is hypocritical to make more of this type than others. They'll all be dealt with by the ref if spotted and it is only because in this country it is considered to be somehow associated with those pesky foreigners that it gets treated with such scorn.
So now I'm a little Englander for saying that an Englishman that dives is a diver. Hysterical in both senses of the word.And the ref did sort it out, he booked Young. For diving.
Ash last night:-Running at players was decent.Set piece delivery was poor.Diving was embarassing.